ROM ranks 3rd and UPLT 71st of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
ROM vs UPLT
ROM −0.02pt a year
0.93%0.95%
ROM 27.4×the volume
47.7K1.74K
ROM vs UPLT Performance
+2.0%−30.8%
- ROM 0.93%, better
- UPLT 0.95%
- ROM $1.15B
- UPLT $0
- ROM +26.5%
- UPLT
- ROM 0.03%
- UPLT
- ROM 85
- UPLT 1
- ROM 47.7K sh, better
- UPLT 1.74K sh
- ROM $132.18
- UPLT $15.51
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ROM | UPLT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70Higher | C51 |
| Mission | A81 | |
| Risk | B56Higher | F16 |
| Tradability | A88Higher | D37 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A81Higher | D33 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. ROM and UPLT are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ROMA
UPLTD
In short
ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.
UPLT Platinum, with the volume turned up. UPLT is the first and only ETF built to track twice platinum's daily move, and it lives inside a 1940 Act fund, so holders get a 1099 instead of a K-1.
Stated mandate
ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.
UPLT The Fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times the daily performance of platinum's price.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ROM vs UPLT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ROM vs UPLT Cost
Overpaying UPLT vs ROM
$330
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ROM 0.93%
$17,539
UPLT 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ROM | UPLT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,644 | $1,678 | $34 |
| 20 | $6,199 | $6,322 | $123 |
| 30 | $17,539 | $17,869 | $330 |
- 0.93%ROM, cheaper
- 0.95%UPLT
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds
UPLT 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
ROM vs UPLT Dividends
- ROM 0.03%
- UPLT
- ROM $0.04
- UPLT
- ROM $0.02
- UPLT $0.17
- ROM Mar 25, 2026
- UPLT Sep 23, 2026
- ROM Mar 31, 2026
- UPLT Sep 29, 2026
- ROM Quarterly
- UPLT Quarterly
Distribution history
ROM vs UPLT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ROM 49.3%UPLT
- Return per unit of risk
- ROM 0.97UPLT
- Worst fall
- ROM −67.6%UPLT
- Market sensitivity
- ROM 3.09UPLT 1.91
Popular comparisons
- 0.93% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.