Skip to content
etf.net

ROM vs WLDU

ProShares Ultra Technology

ROMANYSE Arca

Leverage Shares 2x Long World S

WLDUCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

WLDU −0.18pt a year

ROM0.93%WLDU0.75%

Avg volume · 30D

ROM 6.3×the volume

ROM47.7KWLDU7.62K

ROM vs WLDU Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+2.0%ROM−3.2%WLDU

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. ROM +2.0%. WLDU −3.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.10%20%30%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ROM 0.93%
WLDU 0.75%, better
Fund size
ROM $1.15B
WLDU $3M
1Y total return
ROM +26.5%
WLDU No data
Yield (12M)
ROM 0.03%
WLDU No data
Holdings
ROM 85
WLDU 4
Avg volume (30D)
ROM 47.7K sh, better
WLDU 7.62K sh
NAV per share
ROM $132.18
WLDU $16.39
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ROM: Cost 70, Risk 56, Mission not scored, Tradability 88, Holdings not scored, Durability 81. WLDU: Cost 73, Risk 82, Mission not scored, Tradability 60, Holdings not scored, Durability 35.
Pillar letters and Scores for ROM, WLDU, with each pillar’s weight
PillarROMWLDU
Cost30% weightA70A73Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB56A82Higher
Tradability15% weightA88HigherB60
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA81HigherD35

Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ROM and WLDU are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Leveraged Long (2x & Other)⁠

Category · 95 funds
See all 95 ›

ROM ranks 3rd and WLDU 37th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.

  1. Rank 1AQLDProShares Ultra QQQScore 77
  2. Rank 2AUYGProShares Ultra FinancialsScore 74
  3. Rank 3AROMProShares Ultra TechnologyScore 71
  4. Rank 4BDDMProShares Ultra Dow30Score 69
  5. Rank 37CWEBXCorgi Chinese Internet 2x Daily ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 37CWLDULeverage Shares 2x Long World SScore 40
  7. Rank 37CWXCorgi All World 2x Daily ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ROMAProShares Ultra Technology

WLDUCLeverage Shares 2x Long World S

In short

ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.

WLDU No data

Stated mandate

ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.

WLDU No data

Why people hold it

  • ROM Two times, not three. A 2x daily target means smaller swings and less compounding drag than a 3x fund chasing the same sector.sec.gov
  • Live since January 2007, so it has run through the 2008 crash and the full tech cycle since. Long mileage is rare in geared funds.
  • 0.93% a year, flat, with no waiver propping it up. Peer QLD runs 0.89%, but only net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
  • One of the strongest implementations in the leveraged-bull pack, from an issuer that has run geared funds since the category's early days.proshares.com

WLDU No data

Worth knowing

  • ROM The 2x target resets at each close, so results over weeks or months depend on the path the sector takes, not just where it ends up.sec.govproshares.com
  • Trades thinner than the category's headline names, so spreads and limit orders matter, especially in size.
  • About 80 tech names from the S&P 500. That is one concentrated sector bet, doubled, in both directions.

WLDU No data

Full ROM profile⁠

Full WLDU profile⁠

ROM vs WLDU Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ROM vs WLDU Cost

Overpaying ROM vs WLDU

$3,057

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ROM 0.93%

    $17,539

  • WLDU 0.75%

    $14,482

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ROM 0.93%
  • WLDU 0.75%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530ROM $17,539WLDU $14,482

Year by year

YearROMWLDUOverpaying
10$1,644$1,336$308
20$6,199$5,078$1,121
30$17,539$14,482$3,057

Expense ratio

  • 0.93%ROM
  • 0.75%WLDU, cheaper
  • Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
  • Median 0.95%

WLDU 27th cheapest of 95 funds

ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds

ROM vs WLDU Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ROM 0.03%
WLDU No data
Payout (12M)
ROM $0.04
WLDU None
Last payment
ROM $0.02
WLDU No data
Ex-dividend
ROM Mar 25, 2026
WLDU No data
Paid on
ROM Mar 31, 2026
WLDU No data
Frequency
ROM Quarterly
WLDU No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

ROMQuarterly · 19 paymentsAll ROM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.0015; Dec 26, 2017 $0.0075; Mar 21, 2018 $0.0064; Jun 20, 2018 $0.006; Dec 26, 2018 $0.02; Mar 20, 2019 $0.01; Jun 25, 2019 $0.0043; Dec 24, 2019 $0.01; Mar 25, 2020 $0.02; Dec 20, 2023 $0.0042; Mar 20, 2024 $0.01; Jun 26, 2024 $0.04; Sep 25, 2024 $0.06; Dec 23, 2024 $0.03; Mar 26, 2025 $0.02; Jun 25, 2025 $0.14; Sep 24, 2025 $0.05; Dec 24, 2025 $0.02; Mar 25, 2026 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102017202020232026YTD
WLDUAll WLDU payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ROM vs WLDU Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ROM 49.3%WLDU No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ROM 0.97WLDU No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ROM −67.6%WLDU No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ROM 3.09WLDU 1.90

Popular comparisons

  • ROMAvsQLDA

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • WLDUCvsQLDA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long World S · ProShares Ultra QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ROMAvsUYGA

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • WLDUCvsUYGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long World S · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ROMAvsDDMB

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • WLDUCvsDDMB

    Leverage Shares 2x Long World S · ProShares Ultra Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.