ROM ranks 3rd and WTIB 79th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
ROM vs WTIB
ROM −0.08pt a year
0.93%1.01%
ROM 42.6×the volume
47.7K1.12K
ROM vs WTIB Performance
+32.1%+95.5%
- ROM 0.93%, better
- WTIB 1.01%
- ROM $1.15B
- WTIB $1M
- ROM +19.3%
- WTIB
- ROM 0.03%
- WTIB
- ROM 85
- WTIB 5
- ROM 47.7K sh, better
- WTIB 1.12K sh
- ROM $132.18
- WTIB $36.45
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ROM | WTIB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70Higher | F22 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B56Higher | C52 |
| Tradability | A88Higher | D34 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A81Higher | C47 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. ROM and WTIB are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ROMA
WTIBD
In short
ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.
WTIB Most leveraged funds double down on one market. WTIB stacks two unrelated ones: crude oil futures and bitcoin, actively managed inside a single share from a commodity-futures shop.
Stated mandate
ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.
WTIB The Fund is an actively managed ETF combining an Oil Strategy and a Bitcoin Strategy. It seeks exposure through oil futures, bitcoin investments, and pooled investment vehicles, without tracking a specific benchmark or index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ROM vs WTIB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ROM vs WTIB Cost
Overpaying WTIB vs ROM
$1,311
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ROM 0.93%
$17,539
WTIB 1.01%
$18,850
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ROM | WTIB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,644 | $1,780 | $136 |
| 20 | $6,199 | $6,686 | $487 |
| 30 | $17,539 | $18,850 | $1,311 |
- 0.93%ROM, cheaper
- 1.01%WTIB
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds
WTIB 77th cheapest of 95 funds
ROM vs WTIB Dividends
- ROM 0.03%
- WTIB
- ROM $0.04
- WTIB None
- ROM $0.02
- WTIB
- ROM Mar 25, 2026
- WTIB
- ROM Mar 31, 2026
- WTIB
- ROM Quarterly
- WTIB
Distribution history
ROM vs WTIB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ROM 49.3%WTIB
- Return per unit of risk
- ROM 0.97WTIB
- Worst fall
- ROM −67.6%WTIB
- Market sensitivity
- ROM 3.09WTIB −0.64
Popular comparisons
- 0.93% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.