ROM ranks 3rd and XLUX 37th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
ROM vs XLUX
XLUX −0.48pt a year
0.93%0.45%
ROM 47.1×the volume
47.7K1.01K
ROM vs XLUX Performance
+2.0%−6.0%
- ROM 0.93%
- XLUX 0.45%, better
- ROM $1.15B
- XLUX $0
- ROM +26.5%
- XLUX
- ROM 0.03%
- XLUX
- ROM 85
- XLUX 1
- ROM 47.7K sh, better
- XLUX 1.01K sh
- ROM $132.18
- XLUX $23.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ROM | XLUX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A86Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B56 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | A88Higher | F21 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A81Higher | F23 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. ROM and XLUX are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ROMA
XLUXC
In short
ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.
Stated mandate
ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ROM vs XLUX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ROM vs XLUX Cost
Overpaying ROM vs XLUX
$8,498
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ROM 0.93%
$17,539
XLUX 0.45%
$9,041
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ROM | XLUX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,644 | $812 | $832 |
| 20 | $6,199 | $3,128 | $3,071 |
| 30 | $17,539 | $9,041 | $8,498 |
- 0.93%ROM
- 0.45%XLUX, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
XLUX 3rd cheapest of 95 funds
ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds
ROM vs XLUX Dividends
- ROM 0.03%
- XLUX
- ROM $0.04
- XLUX None
- ROM $0.02
- XLUX
- ROM Mar 25, 2026
- XLUX
- ROM Mar 31, 2026
- XLUX
- ROM Quarterly
- XLUX
Distribution history
ROM vs XLUX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ROM 49.3%XLUX
- Return per unit of risk
- ROM 0.97XLUX
- Worst fall
- ROM −67.6%XLUX
- Market sensitivity
- ROM 3.09XLUX −0.18
Popular comparisons
- 0.93% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.