ROM ranks 3rd and XLYX 37th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
ROM vs XLYX
XLYX −0.48pt a year
0.93%0.45%
ROM 301.7×the volume
47.7K158
ROM vs XLYX Performance
+2.0%−4.1%
- ROM 0.93%
- XLYX 0.45%, better
- ROM $1.15B
- XLYX $0
- ROM +26.5%
- XLYX
- ROM 0.03%
- XLYX
- ROM 85
- XLYX 1
- ROM 47.7K sh, better
- XLYX 158 sh
- ROM $132.18
- XLYX $22.93
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ROM | XLYX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A86Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B56 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | A88Higher | F18 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A81Higher | F20 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. ROM and XLYX are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ROMA
XLYXC
In short
ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.
Stated mandate
ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ROM vs XLYX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ROM vs XLYX Cost
Overpaying ROM vs XLYX
$8,498
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ROM 0.93%
$17,539
XLYX 0.45%
$9,041
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ROM | XLYX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,644 | $812 | $832 |
| 20 | $6,199 | $3,128 | $3,071 |
| 30 | $17,539 | $9,041 | $8,498 |
- 0.93%ROM
- 0.45%XLYX, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
XLYX 3rd cheapest of 95 funds
ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds
ROM vs XLYX Dividends
- ROM 0.03%
- XLYX
- ROM $0.04
- XLYX None
- ROM $0.02
- XLYX
- ROM Mar 25, 2026
- XLYX
- ROM Mar 31, 2026
- XLYX
- ROM Quarterly
- XLYX
Distribution history
ROM vs XLYX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ROM 49.3%XLYX
- Return per unit of risk
- ROM 0.97XLYX
- Worst fall
- ROM −67.6%XLYX
- Market sensitivity
- ROM 3.09XLYX 3.10
Popular comparisons
- 0.93% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.