Skip to content

ROM vs XNDX

ProShares Ultra Technology

ROMANYSE Arca

Tradr 2X Long XNDU Daily ETF

XNDXFCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ROM −0.56pt a year

ROM0.93%XNDX1.49%

Avg volume · 30D

XNDX 7.7×the volume

ROM50.3KXNDX385K

ROM vs XNDX Performance

Aug 7, 2026 – Nov 9, 2026

−20.2%ROM−95.2%XNDX

Aug 7, 2026 to Nov 9, 2026. ROM −20.2%. XNDX −95.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−50%50%100%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
ROM 0.93%, better
XNDX 1.49%
Fund size
ROM $962M
XNDX $3M
1Y total return
ROM +23.8%
XNDX No data
Yield (12M)
ROM 0.03%
XNDX No data
Holdings
ROM 86
XNDX 2
Avg volume (30D)
ROM 50.3K sh
XNDX 385K sh, better
NAV per share
ROM $110.30
XNDX $0.4000
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ROM: Cost 70, Risk 49, Mission not scored, Tradability 88, Holdings 52, Durability 80. XNDX: Cost 6, Risk 12, Mission not scored, Tradability 22, Holdings not scored, Durability 35.
Pillar letters and Scores for ROM, XNDX, with each pillar’s weight
PillarROMXNDX
Cost30% weightA70HigherF6
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC49HigherF12
Tradability15% weightA88HigherF22
Holdings10% weightC52Not scored
Durability5% weightA80HigherD35

Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ROM and XNDX are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Leveraged Long (2x & Other)⁠

Category · 95 funds
See all 95 ›

ROM ranks 3rd and XNDX 93rd of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.

  1. Rank 1AQLDProShares Ultra QQQScore 76
  2. Rank 2AUYGProShares Ultra FinancialsScore 74
  3. Rank 3AROMProShares Ultra TechnologyScore 70
  4. Rank 4BDDMProShares Ultra Dow30Score 69
  5. Rank 92FURAADirexion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X ETFScore 22
  6. Rank 93FXNDXTradr 2X Long XNDU Daily ETFScore 13
  7. KPONot yet graded
  8. RAAANot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ROMAProShares Ultra Technology

XNDXFTradr 2X Long XNDU Daily ETF

In short

ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.

XNDX No data

Stated mandate

ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.

XNDX No data

Why people hold it

  • ROM Two times, not three. A 2x daily target means smaller swings and less compounding drag than a 3x fund chasing the same sector.sec.gov
  • Live since January 2007, so it has run through the 2008 crash and the full tech cycle since. Long mileage is rare in geared funds.
  • 0.93% a year, flat, with no waiver propping it up. Peer QLD runs 0.89%, but only net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
  • One of the strongest implementations in the leveraged-bull pack, from an issuer that has run geared funds since the category's early days.proshares.com

XNDX No data

Worth knowing

  • ROM The 2x target resets at each close, so results over weeks or months depend on the path the sector takes, not just where it ends up.sec.govproshares.com
  • Trades thinner than the category's headline names, so spreads and limit orders matter, especially in size.
  • About 80 tech names from the S&P 500. That is one concentrated sector bet, doubled, in both directions.

XNDX No data

Full ROM profile⁠

Full XNDX profile⁠

ROM vs XNDX Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ROM vs XNDX Cost

Overpaying XNDX vs ROM

$8,602

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ROM 0.93%

    $17,539

  • XNDX 1.49%

    $26,141

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ROM 0.93%
  • XNDX 1.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$10K$20K$30K051015202530XNDX $26,141ROM $17,539

Year by year

YearROMXNDXOverpaying
10$1,644$2,574$930
20$6,199$9,464$3,265
30$17,539$26,141$8,602

Expense ratio

  • 0.93%ROM, cheaper
  • 1.49%XNDX
  • Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
  • Median 0.95%

ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds

XNDX 93rd cheapest of 95 funds

ROM vs XNDX Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
ROM 0.03%
XNDX No data
Payout (12M)
ROM $0.04
XNDX None
Last payment
ROM $0.02
XNDX No data
Ex-dividend
ROM Mar 25, 2026
XNDX No data
Paid on
ROM Mar 31, 2026
XNDX No data
Frequency
ROM Quarterly
XNDX No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

ROMQuarterly · 19 paymentsAll ROM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.0015; Dec 26, 2017 $0.0075; Mar 21, 2018 $0.0064; Jun 20, 2018 $0.006; Dec 26, 2018 $0.02; Mar 20, 2019 $0.01; Jun 25, 2019 $0.0043; Dec 24, 2019 $0.01; Mar 25, 2020 $0.02; Dec 20, 2023 $0.0042; Mar 20, 2024 $0.01; Jun 26, 2024 $0.04; Sep 25, 2024 $0.06; Dec 23, 2024 $0.03; Mar 26, 2025 $0.02; Jun 25, 2025 $0.14; Sep 24, 2025 $0.05; Dec 24, 2025 $0.02; Mar 25, 2026 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102017202020232026YTD
XNDXAll XNDX payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ROM vs XNDX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ROM 49.3%XNDX No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ROM 0.97XNDX No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ROM −67.6%XNDX No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ROM 3.09XNDX 0.00

Popular comparisons

  • ROMAvsQLDA

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XNDXFvsQLDA

    Tradr 2X Long XNDU Daily ETF · ProShares Ultra QQQ

    Expense ratio
    1.49% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ROMAvsUYGA

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XNDXFvsUYGA

    Tradr 2X Long XNDU Daily ETF · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    1.49% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ROMAvsDDMB

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XNDXFvsDDMB

    Tradr 2X Long XNDU Daily ETF · ProShares Ultra Dow30

    Expense ratio
    1.49% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.