Skip to content
etf.net

ROM vs XW

ProShares Ultra Technology

ROMANYSE Arca

Corgi Ex-U.S. Equities 2x Daily ETF

XWCCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

XW −0.48pt a year

ROM0.93%XW0.45%

Avg volume · 30D

ROM 183.3×the volume

ROM47.7KXW260

ROM vs XW Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026

−3.8%ROM−7.8%XW

Jul 31, 2026 to Nov 2, 2026. ROM −3.8%. XW −7.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.10%20%30%Jul 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
ROM 0.93%
XW 0.45%, better
Fund size
ROM $1.15B
XW $0
1Y total return
ROM +19.3%
XW No data
Yield (12M)
ROM 0.03%
XW No data
Holdings
ROM 85
XW 1
Avg volume (30D)
ROM 47.7K sh, better
XW 260 sh
NAV per share
ROM $132.18
XW $21.33
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ROM: Cost 70, Risk 56, Mission not scored, Tradability 88, Holdings not scored, Durability 81. XW: Cost 86, Risk 61, Mission not scored, Tradability 15, Holdings not scored, Durability 20.
Pillar letters and Scores for ROM, XW, with each pillar’s weight
PillarROMXW
Cost30% weightA70A86Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB56B61Higher
Tradability15% weightA88HigherF15
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA81HigherF20

Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ROM and XW are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Leveraged Long (2x & Other)⁠

Category · 95 funds
See all 95 ›

ROM ranks 3rd and XW 37th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.

  1. Rank 1AQLDProShares Ultra QQQScore 78
  2. Rank 2AUYGProShares Ultra FinancialsScore 73
  3. Rank 3AROMProShares Ultra TechnologyScore 71
  4. Rank 4BDDMProShares Ultra Dow30Score 69
  5. Rank 37CXSEMCorgi U.S. Semiconductors 2x Daily ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 37CXWCorgi Ex-U.S. Equities 2x Daily ETFScore 40
  7. Rank 71DEZJProShares Ultra MSCI JapanScore 38

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ROMAProShares Ultra Technology

XWCCorgi Ex-U.S. Equities 2x Daily ETF

In short

ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.

XW No data

Stated mandate

ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.

XW No data

Why people hold it

  • ROM Two times, not three. A 2x daily target means smaller swings and less compounding drag than a 3x fund chasing the same sector.sec.gov
  • Live since January 2007, so it has run through the 2008 crash and the full tech cycle since. Long mileage is rare in geared funds.
  • 0.93% a year, flat, with no waiver propping it up. Peer QLD runs 0.89%, but only net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
  • One of the strongest implementations in the leveraged-bull pack, from an issuer that has run geared funds since the category's early days.proshares.com

XW No data

Worth knowing

  • ROM The 2x target resets at each close, so results over weeks or months depend on the path the sector takes, not just where it ends up.sec.govproshares.com
  • Trades thinner than the category's headline names, so spreads and limit orders matter, especially in size.
  • About 80 tech names from the S&P 500. That is one concentrated sector bet, doubled, in both directions.

XW No data

Full ROM profile⁠

Full XW profile⁠

ROM vs XW Holdings

How ROM and XW differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of ROM and 0.0% of XW.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile99.4%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for XW.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in ROM and XW, widest gap first
CountryMore in ROMMore in XW
United StatesXW +0.6 points
Other countries (2)ROM +0.6 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • ROM70.0%
  • XW199.3%

Securities held

  • ROM84
  • XW0

Asset class

ROM
Equity
XW
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in ROM84
  • In both0
  • Only in XW0

Only in ROM

84 securities, 70.9% of ROM by weight

  • Apple Inc9.53%
  • NVIDIA Corp9.38%
  • Microsoft Corp7.34%

Only in XW

0 securities, 0.0% of XW by weight

Weight gaps

ROM and XW share no securities.

All 80 ROM holdings⁠All 15 XW holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ROM vs XW Cost

Overpaying ROM vs XW

$8,498

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ROM 0.93%

    $17,539

  • XW 0.45%

    $9,041

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ROM 0.93%
  • XW 0.45%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530ROM $17,539XW $9,041

Year by year

YearROMXWOverpaying
10$1,644$812$832
20$6,199$3,128$3,071
30$17,539$9,041$8,498

Expense ratio

  • 0.93%ROM
  • 0.45%XW, cheaper
  • Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
  • Median 0.95%

XW 3rd cheapest of 95 funds

ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds

ROM vs XW Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
ROM 0.03%
XW No data
Payout (12M)
ROM $0.04
XW None
Last payment
ROM $0.02
XW No data
Ex-dividend
ROM Mar 25, 2026
XW No data
Paid on
ROM Mar 31, 2026
XW No data
Frequency
ROM Quarterly
XW No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

ROMQuarterly · 19 paymentsAll ROM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.0015; Dec 26, 2017 $0.0075; Mar 21, 2018 $0.0064; Jun 20, 2018 $0.006; Dec 26, 2018 $0.02; Mar 20, 2019 $0.01; Jun 25, 2019 $0.0043; Dec 24, 2019 $0.01; Mar 25, 2020 $0.02; Dec 20, 2023 $0.0042; Mar 20, 2024 $0.01; Jun 26, 2024 $0.04; Sep 25, 2024 $0.06; Dec 23, 2024 $0.03; Mar 26, 2025 $0.02; Jun 25, 2025 $0.14; Sep 24, 2025 $0.05; Dec 24, 2025 $0.02; Mar 25, 2026 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102017202020232026YTD
XWAll XW payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ROM vs XW Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ROM 49.3%XW No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ROM 0.97XW No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ROM −67.6%XW No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ROM 3.09XW 3.55

Popular comparisons

  • ROMAvsQLDA

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XWCvsQLDA

    Corgi Ex-U.S. Equities 2x Daily ETF · ProShares Ultra QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ROMAvsUYGA

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XWCvsUYGA

    Corgi Ex-U.S. Equities 2x Daily ETF · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ROMAvsDDMB

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XWCvsDDMB

    Corgi Ex-U.S. Equities 2x Daily ETF · ProShares Ultra Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.