Skip to content

RSPD vs XLY

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF

RSPDCNYSE Arca

State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF

XLYANYSE Arca

Overlap

53.3%by weight

Expense ratio

XLY −0.32pt a year

RSPD0.40%XLY0.08%

Avg volume · 30D

XLY 40.0×the volume

RSPD176KXLY7.02M

10Y return · a year

XLY +4.4pt

RSPD+8.2%XLY+12.6%

RSPD vs XLY Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+14.7%RSPD+19.6%XLY

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. RSPD +14.7%. XLY +19.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%30%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
RSPD 0.40%
XLY 0.08%, better
Fund size
RSPD $275M
XLY $22.5B
1Y total return
RSPD +1.4%, better
XLY −3.0%
Yield (12M)
RSPD 0.92%, better
XLY 0.81%
Holdings
RSPD 49
XLY 50
Avg volume (30D)
RSPD 176K sh
XLY 7.02M sh, better
NAV per share
RSPD $55.57
XLY $116.15
52W range

ETF.net Grade

RSPD: Cost 14, Risk 63, Mission not scored, Tradability 49, Holdings 78, Durability 46. XLY: Cost 96, Risk 51, Mission 81, Tradability 100, Holdings 39, Durability 79.
Pillar letters and Scores for RSPD, XLY, with each pillar’s weight
PillarRSPDXLY
Cost30% weightF14A96Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA81
Risk15% weightB63HigherC51
Tradability15% weightC49A100Higher
Holdings10% weightA78HigherD39
Durability5% weightC46A79Higher

Rank among Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. RSPD and XLY are both graded against the same 14 Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 14 ›

XLY ranks 1st and RSPD 10th of 14 funds in the Consumer Discretionary (Broad) Category.

  1. Rank 1AXLYState Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETFScore 79
  2. Rank 2BFDISFidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETFScore 69
  3. Rank 9CIYCiShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETFScore 48
  4. Rank 10CRSPDInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETFScore 41
  5. Rank 11DRXIiShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETFScore 38

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

RSPDCInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF

XLYAState Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF

In short

RSPD Every consumer discretionary name in the S&P 500 gets the same slice here, so no single mega-cap sets the tone. Same shopping list as the cap-weighted sector funds, a very different plate.

XLY Live since 1998 as one of the original Select Sector SPDRs, XLY bundles the S&P 500's spending-money stocks (cars, couches, burgers, online carts) into one heavily traded ticker at eight basis points.

Stated mandate

RSPD The Fund tracks an index that equally weights stocks in the consumer discretionary sector of the S&P 500® Index.

XLY The fund seeks to track the performance of the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, providing targeted exposure to companies in the consumer discretionary sector.

Why people hold it

  • RSPD Equal weighting: roughly 50 S&P 500 discretionary names each get the same cut, so a homebuilder or restaurant chain counts as much as the biggest online retailer.invesco.com
  • The starting universe is the S&P 500 itself, so the roster is large, established US consumer companies rather than small-cap retail.invesco.com
  • Trading since 2006, it has carried the same equal-weight mandate through multiple consumer spending cycles.
  • It hugs its index tightly, which is the entire job of an index fund, and stands as one of the stronger implementations in the discretionary group.
  • XLY Charges 0.08% a year, a fraction of the roughly 0.35% typical for consumer discretionary funds, and tied for the cheapest in its peer group.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund and one of the most actively traded in the category, which generally shows up as tight bid-ask spreads for buyers and sellers.
  • Plain mandate: S&P 500 consumer discretionary members, with capping rules that stop any single company from swallowing the index. Pays quarterly.spglobal.com
  • Trading since December 1998 as one of the first US sector funds, and it still stands among the strongest implementations in its peer group.

Worth knowing

  • RSPD At 0.40% a year it costs more than cap-weighted rivals like XLY (0.08%) and VCR (0.09%). The equal-weight tilt is what you are paying up for.
  • Volume is moderate rather than heavy, so spreads deserve a look and limit orders do more work here than in the largest sector funds.
  • One cyclical sector, about 50 stocks. Income arrives quarterly, but the ride tracks how freely households are spending.
  • XLY About 50 stocks. Even with the index caps, a small handful of megacaps drives most of the movement.spglobal.com
  • S&P 500 members only, so smaller retailers and restaurant chains sit outside the index entirely.spglobal.com
  • One sector, and a cyclical one: discretionary spending rises and falls with the economy, and the fund is classified as non-diversified.sec.govbritannica.com

Full RSPD profile⁠

Full XLY profile⁠

RSPD vs XLY Holdings

How RSPD and XLY differ

Overlap by weight

53.3%

Shared holdings make up 99.9% of XLY and 99.9% of RSPD.

Level by level

  • Holdings47 in both53.3%
  • Sector4 Sectors98.7%
  • Countryby domicile99.1%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in RSPD and XLY, widest gap first
SectorMore in RSPDMore in XLY
Consumer DiscretionaryXLY +1.3 points
TechnologyRSPD +1.0 points
CommunicationRSPD +0.2 points
FinancialsRSPD +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in RSPD and XLY, widest gap first
CountryMore in RSPDMore in XLY
United StatesXLY +0.9 points
SwitzerlandRSPD +0.9 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • RSPD24.7%
  • XLY67.7%

Securities held

  • RSPD48
  • XLY48

Asset class

RSPD
Equity
XLY
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in RSPD1
  • In both47
  • Only in XLY1

Only in RSPD

1 security, 0.1% of RSPD by weight

  • Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio0.08%

Only in XLY

1 security, 0.0% of XLY by weight

  • Xay Cons Discret DEC26<0.01%

Weight gaps

All 47 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in RSPD and XLY, widest gap first
HoldingMore in RSPDMore in XLY
Amazon.com IncAMZNXLY +19.50 points
Tesla IncTSLAXLY +16.60 points
Home Depot Inc/TheHDXLY +3.28 points
McDonald's CorpMCDXLY +2.35 points
Hasbro IncHASRSPD +2.30 points
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings LtdNCLHRSPD +2.28 points
Ralph Lauren CorpRLRSPD +2.04 points
Lululemon Athletica IncLULURSPD +1.94 points

All 48 RSPD holdings⁠All 47 XLY holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

RSPD vs XLY Cost

Overpaying RSPD vs XLY

$6,401

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • RSPD 0.40%

    $8,090

  • XLY 0.08%

    $1,689

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • RSPD 0.40%
  • XLY 0.08%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530RSPD $8,090XLY $1,689

Year by year

YearRSPDXLYOverpaying
10$723$147$576
20$2,793$575$2,218
30$8,090$1,689$6,401

Expense ratio

  • 0.40%RSPD
  • 0.08%XLY, cheaper
  • Middle half of Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds
  • Median 0.35%

XLY cheapest of 14 funds

RSPD 12th cheapest of 14 funds

RSPD vs XLY Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
RSPD 0.92%, better
XLY 0.81%
Payout (12M)
RSPD $0.51
XLY $0.93
Last payment
RSPD $0.13
XLY $0.24
Ex-dividend
RSPD Sep 21, 2026
XLY Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
RSPD Sep 25, 2026
XLY Sep 23, 2026
Frequency
RSPD Quarterly
XLY Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

RSPDQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll RSPD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.11; Jun 16, 2017 $0.11; Sep 15, 2017 $0.13; Dec 15, 2017 $0.14; Mar 16, 2018 $0.10; Jun 15, 2018 $0.09; Sep 24, 2018 $0.13; Dec 24, 2018 $0.19; Mar 18, 2019 $0.12; Jun 24, 2019 $0.14; Sep 23, 2019 $0.16; Dec 23, 2019 $0.17; Mar 23, 2020 $0.17; Jun 22, 2020 $0.07; Sep 21, 2020 $0.05; Dec 21, 2020 $0.03; Mar 22, 2021 $0.04; Jun 21, 2021 $0.06; Sep 20, 2021 $0.06; Dec 20, 2021 $0.11; Mar 21, 2022 $0.09; Jun 21, 2022 $0.11; Sep 19, 2022 $0.09; Dec 19, 2022 $0.10; Mar 20, 2023 $0.14; Jun 20, 2023 $0.15; Sep 18, 2023 $0.12; Dec 18, 2023 $0.11; Mar 18, 2024 $0.13; Jun 24, 2024 $0.10; Sep 23, 2024 $0.11; Dec 23, 2024 $0.10; Mar 24, 2025 $0.18; Jun 23, 2025 $0.21; Sep 22, 2025 $0.11; Dec 22, 2025 $0.12; Mar 23, 2026 $0.12; Jun 22, 2026 $0.14; Sep 21, 2026 $0.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD
XLYQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll XLY payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.13; Jun 16, 2017 $0.14; Sep 15, 2017 $0.16; Dec 15, 2017 $0.17; Mar 16, 2018 $0.16; Jun 15, 2018 $0.15; Sep 21, 2018 $0.18; Dec 21, 2018 $0.19; Mar 15, 2019 $0.19; Jun 21, 2019 $0.21; Sep 20, 2019 $0.20; Dec 20, 2019 $0.20; Mar 23, 2020 $0.21; Jun 22, 2020 $0.15; Sep 21, 2020 $0.15; Dec 21, 2020 $0.15; Mar 22, 2021 $0.13; Jun 21, 2021 $0.13; Sep 20, 2021 $0.14; Dec 20, 2021 $0.15; Mar 21, 2022 $0.14; Jun 21, 2022 $0.16; Sep 19, 2022 $0.17; Dec 19, 2022 $0.18; Mar 20, 2023 $0.22; Jun 20, 2023 $0.17; Sep 18, 2023 $0.15; Dec 18, 2023 $0.16; Mar 18, 2024 $0.19; Jun 24, 2024 $0.20; Sep 23, 2024 $0.20; Dec 23, 2024 $0.22; Mar 24, 2025 $0.27; Jun 23, 2025 $0.22; Sep 22, 2025 $0.21; Dec 22, 2025 $0.24; Mar 23, 2026 $0.22; Jun 22, 2026 $0.23; Sep 21, 2026 $0.24. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD

RSPD vs XLY Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • RSPD
  • XLY
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: XLY −39.7% · Dec 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−40%−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
RSPD 16.7%, betterXLY 17.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
RSPD 0.58XLY 0.67, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
RSPD −34.4%, betterXLY −39.7%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
RSPD 1.12XLY 1.22

RSPD and XLY in the news

Popular comparisons

  • RSPDCvsFDISB

    Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF · Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XLYAvsFDISB

    State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF · Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSPDCvsXRTB

    Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Retail ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XLYAvsXRTB

    State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Retail ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSPDCvsVCRB

    Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF · Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XLYAvsVCRB

    State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF · Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.