XRT ranks 3rd and RSPD 10th of 14 funds in the Consumer Discretionary (Broad) Category.
RSPD vs XRT
XRT −0.05pt a year
0.40%0.35%
XRT 21.8×the volume
176K3.83M
XRT +1.1pt
+8.2%+9.3%
RSPD vs XRT Performance
+14.7%+1.8%
- RSPD 0.40%
- XRT 0.35%, better
- RSPD $275M
- XRT $405M
- RSPD +1.4%
- XRT +10.5%, better
- RSPD 0.92%, better
- XRT 0.84%
- RSPD 49
- XRT 76
- RSPD 176K sh
- XRT 3.83M sh, better
- RSPD $55.57
- XRT $88.99
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RSPD | XRT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F14 | C50Higher |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | B63 | B65Higher |
| Tradability | C49 | A87Higher |
| Holdings | A78 | A85Higher |
| Durability | C46 | B59Higher |
Rank among Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds
Same Category. RSPD and XRT are both graded against the same 14 Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RSPDC
XRTB
In short
RSPD Every consumer discretionary name in the S&P 500 gets the same slice here, so no single mega-cap sets the tone. Same shopping list as the cap-weighted sector funds, a very different plate.
XRT Pure retail, not broad consumer discretionary. XRT equal-weights roughly 80 store chains and online sellers, so a small-cap mall retailer carries about as much freight as a mega-cap giant. It has been the sector's trading vehicle since 2006.
Stated mandate
RSPD The Fund tracks an index that equally weights stocks in the consumer discretionary sector of the S&P 500® Index.
XRT The fund seeks to provide investment results that generally correspond to the total return performance of the S&P Retail Select Industry Index, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RSPD vs XRT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RSPD vs XRT Cost
Overpaying RSPD vs XRT
$964
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RSPD 0.40%
$8,090
XRT 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RSPD | XRT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $634 | $89 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $2,454 | $339 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $7,126 | $964 |
- 0.40%RSPD
- 0.35%XRT, cheaper
- Middle half of Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds
- Median 0.35%
XRT 6th cheapest of 14 funds
RSPD 12th cheapest of 14 funds
RSPD vs XRT Dividends
- RSPD 0.92%, better
- XRT 0.84%
- RSPD $0.51
- XRT $0.74
- RSPD $0.13
- XRT $0.17
- RSPD Sep 21, 2026
- XRT Sep 21, 2026
- RSPD Sep 25, 2026
- XRT Sep 23, 2026
- RSPD Quarterly
- XRT Quarterly
Distribution history
RSPD vs XRT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- RSPD
- XRT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RSPD 16.7%, betterXRT 20.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- RSPD 0.58XRT 0.61, better
- Worst fall
- RSPD −34.4%, betterXRT −44.6%
- Market sensitivity
- RSPD 1.12XRT 1.17
RSPD and XRT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





