FDIS ranks 2nd and RSPD 10th of 14 funds in the Consumer Discretionary (Broad) Category.
FDIS vs RSPD
FDIS −0.32pt a year
0.08%0.40%
RSPD 1.6×the volume
109K176K
FDIS +5.4pt
+13.6%+8.2%
FDIS vs RSPD Performance
+19.1%+14.7%
- FDIS 0.08%, better
- RSPD 0.40%
- FDIS $1.63B
- RSPD $275M
- FDIS −1.7%
- RSPD +1.4%, better
- FDIS 0.77%
- RSPD 0.92%, better
- FDIS 242
- RSPD 49
- FDIS 109K sh
- RSPD 176K sh, better
- FDIS $100.14
- RSPD $55.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FDIS | RSPD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | F14 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C42 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | B60Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | C51 | A78Higher |
| Durability | B58Higher | C46 |
Rank among Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds
Same Category. FDIS and RSPD are both graded against the same 14 Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FDISB
RSPDC
In short
FDIS Cheap and wide. FDIS holds about 300 US consumer discretionary stocks rather than the sector's mega-cap handful, and charges 0.08% while the typical fund in its peer group asks roughly four times that.
RSPD Every consumer discretionary name in the S&P 500 gets the same slice here, so no single mega-cap sets the tone. Same shopping list as the cap-weighted sector funds, a very different plate.
Stated mandate
FDIS The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index.
RSPD The Fund tracks an index that equally weights stocks in the consumer discretionary sector of the S&P 500® Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FDIS vs RSPD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FDIS vs RSPD Cost
Overpaying RSPD vs FDIS
$6,317
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FDIS 0.084%
$1,773
RSPD 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FDIS | RSPD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $154 | $723 | $569 |
| 20 | $603 | $2,793 | $2,190 |
| 30 | $1,773 | $8,090 | $6,317 |
- 0.08%FDIS, cheaper
- 0.40%RSPD
- Middle half of Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds
- Median 0.35%
FDIS 2nd cheapest of 14 funds
RSPD 12th cheapest of 14 funds
FDIS vs RSPD Dividends
- FDIS 0.77%
- RSPD 0.92%, better
- FDIS $0.78
- RSPD $0.51
- FDIS $0.20
- RSPD $0.13
- FDIS Sep 18, 2026
- RSPD Sep 21, 2026
- FDIS Sep 22, 2026
- RSPD Sep 25, 2026
- FDIS Quarterly
- RSPD Quarterly
Distribution history
FDIS vs RSPD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FDIS
- RSPD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FDIS 18.2%RSPD 16.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FDIS 0.65, betterRSPD 0.58
- Worst fall
- FDIS −39.2%RSPD −34.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FDIS 1.26RSPD 1.12
FDIS and RSPD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
