Skip to content

FDIS vs RSPD

Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF

FDISBNYSE Arca

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF

RSPDCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

FDIS −0.32pt a year

FDIS0.08%RSPD0.40%

Avg volume · 30D

RSPD 1.6×the volume

FDIS109KRSPD176K

10Y return · a year

FDIS +5.4pt

FDIS+13.6%RSPD+8.2%

FDIS vs RSPD Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+19.1%FDIS+14.7%RSPD

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. FDIS +19.1%. RSPD +14.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%30%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FDIS 0.08%, better
RSPD 0.40%
Fund size
FDIS $1.63B
RSPD $275M
1Y total return
FDIS −1.7%
RSPD +1.4%, better
Yield (12M)
FDIS 0.77%
RSPD 0.92%, better
Holdings
FDIS 242
RSPD 49
Avg volume (30D)
FDIS 109K sh
RSPD 176K sh, better
NAV per share
FDIS $100.14
RSPD $55.57
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FDIS: Cost 96, Risk 42, Mission not scored, Tradability 60, Holdings 51, Durability 58. RSPD: Cost 14, Risk 63, Mission not scored, Tradability 49, Holdings 78, Durability 46.
Pillar letters and Scores for FDIS, RSPD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFDISRSPD
Cost30% weightA96HigherF14
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC42B63Higher
Tradability15% weightB60HigherC49
Holdings10% weightC51A78Higher
Durability5% weightB58HigherC46

Rank among Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FDIS and RSPD are both graded against the same 14 Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 14 ›

FDIS ranks 2nd and RSPD 10th of 14 funds in the Consumer Discretionary (Broad) Category.

  1. Rank 1AXLYState Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETFScore 79
  2. Rank 2BFDISFidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETFScore 69
  3. Rank 3BXRTState Street SPDR S&P Retail ETFScore 65
  4. Rank 9CIYCiShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETFScore 48
  5. Rank 10CRSPDInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETFScore 41
  6. Rank 11DRXIiShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETFScore 38

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FDISBFidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF

RSPDCInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF

In short

FDIS Cheap and wide. FDIS holds about 300 US consumer discretionary stocks rather than the sector's mega-cap handful, and charges 0.08% while the typical fund in its peer group asks roughly four times that.

RSPD Every consumer discretionary name in the S&P 500 gets the same slice here, so no single mega-cap sets the tone. Same shopping list as the cap-weighted sector funds, a very different plate.

Stated mandate

FDIS The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index.

RSPD The Fund tracks an index that equally weights stocks in the consumer discretionary sector of the S&P 500® Index.

Why people hold it

  • FDIS 0.08% a year, level with the cheapest large fund in the group (XLY) and a fraction of the roughly 0.35% cohort median.
  • About 300 holdings: the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index reaches past the mega caps into mid and small caps.
  • Tracks that index closely, one of the stronger implementations among the 17 funds in its consumer discretionary group.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund from Fidelity, trading since 2013, that pays distributions quarterly.
  • RSPD Equal weighting: roughly 50 S&P 500 discretionary names each get the same cut, so a homebuilder or restaurant chain counts as much as the biggest online retailer.invesco.com
  • The starting universe is the S&P 500 itself, so the roster is large, established US consumer companies rather than small-cap retail.invesco.com
  • Trading since 2006, it has carried the same equal-weight mandate through multiple consumer spending cycles.
  • It hugs its index tightly, which is the entire job of an index fund, and stands as one of the stronger implementations in the discretionary group.

Worth knowing

  • FDIS One sector, and a cyclical one. Returns ride on how freely US households spend, so the ride is bumpier than a total-market fund's.
  • The 25/50 rules cap how large any single position gets, but this is still a concentrated slice of the US market.
  • Moderately traded rather than the category's busiest ticker. Limit orders are the sensible habit, especially in size.
  • RSPD At 0.40% a year it costs more than cap-weighted rivals like XLY (0.08%) and VCR (0.09%). The equal-weight tilt is what you are paying up for.
  • Volume is moderate rather than heavy, so spreads deserve a look and limit orders do more work here than in the largest sector funds.
  • One cyclical sector, about 50 stocks. Income arrives quarterly, but the ride tracks how freely households are spending.

Full FDIS profile⁠

Full RSPD profile⁠

FDIS vs RSPD Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FDIS vs RSPD Cost

Overpaying RSPD vs FDIS

$6,317

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FDIS 0.084%

    $1,773

  • RSPD 0.40%

    $8,090

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FDIS 0.084%
  • RSPD 0.40%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530RSPD $8,090FDIS $1,773

Year by year

YearFDISRSPDOverpaying
10$154$723$569
20$603$2,793$2,190
30$1,773$8,090$6,317

Expense ratio

  • 0.08%FDIS, cheaper
  • 0.40%RSPD
  • Middle half of Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds
  • Median 0.35%

FDIS 2nd cheapest of 14 funds

RSPD 12th cheapest of 14 funds

FDIS vs RSPD Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FDIS 0.77%
RSPD 0.92%, better
Payout (12M)
FDIS $0.78
RSPD $0.51
Last payment
FDIS $0.20
RSPD $0.13
Ex-dividend
FDIS Sep 18, 2026
RSPD Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
FDIS Sep 22, 2026
RSPD Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
FDIS Quarterly
RSPD Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FDISQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll FDIS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.09; Jun 16, 2017 $0.11; Sep 15, 2017 $0.12; Dec 15, 2017 $0.07; Mar 16, 2018 $0.11; Jun 15, 2018 $0.11; Sep 21, 2018 $0.13; Dec 21, 2018 $0.14; Mar 15, 2019 $0.14; Jun 21, 2019 $0.14; Sep 20, 2019 $0.14; Dec 20, 2019 $0.14; Mar 20, 2020 $0.15; Jun 19, 2020 $0.08; Sep 18, 2020 $0.09; Dec 18, 2020 $0.10; Mar 19, 2021 $0.10; Jun 18, 2021 $0.11; Sep 17, 2021 $0.13; Dec 17, 2021 $0.17; Mar 18, 2022 $0.14; Jun 17, 2022 $0.14; Sep 16, 2022 $0.14; Dec 16, 2022 $0.14; Mar 17, 2023 $0.17; Jun 16, 2023 $0.15; Sep 15, 2023 $0.14; Dec 15, 2023 $0.15; Mar 15, 2024 $0.17; Jun 21, 2024 $0.17; Sep 20, 2024 $0.17; Dec 20, 2024 $0.17; Mar 21, 2025 $0.21; Jun 20, 2025 $0.20; Sep 19, 2025 $0.17; Dec 19, 2025 $0.19; Mar 20, 2026 $0.19; Jun 18, 2026 $0.20; Sep 18, 2026 $0.20. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202017202020232026YTD
RSPDQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll RSPD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.11; Jun 16, 2017 $0.11; Sep 15, 2017 $0.13; Dec 15, 2017 $0.14; Mar 16, 2018 $0.10; Jun 15, 2018 $0.09; Sep 24, 2018 $0.13; Dec 24, 2018 $0.19; Mar 18, 2019 $0.12; Jun 24, 2019 $0.14; Sep 23, 2019 $0.16; Dec 23, 2019 $0.17; Mar 23, 2020 $0.17; Jun 22, 2020 $0.07; Sep 21, 2020 $0.05; Dec 21, 2020 $0.03; Mar 22, 2021 $0.04; Jun 21, 2021 $0.06; Sep 20, 2021 $0.06; Dec 20, 2021 $0.11; Mar 21, 2022 $0.09; Jun 21, 2022 $0.11; Sep 19, 2022 $0.09; Dec 19, 2022 $0.10; Mar 20, 2023 $0.14; Jun 20, 2023 $0.15; Sep 18, 2023 $0.12; Dec 18, 2023 $0.11; Mar 18, 2024 $0.13; Jun 24, 2024 $0.10; Sep 23, 2024 $0.11; Dec 23, 2024 $0.10; Mar 24, 2025 $0.18; Jun 23, 2025 $0.21; Sep 22, 2025 $0.11; Dec 22, 2025 $0.12; Mar 23, 2026 $0.12; Jun 22, 2026 $0.14; Sep 21, 2026 $0.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202017202020232026YTD

FDIS vs RSPD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FDIS
  • RSPD
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: FDIS −39.2% · Dec 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−40%−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FDIS 18.2%RSPD 16.7%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FDIS 0.65, betterRSPD 0.58
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FDIS −39.2%RSPD −34.4%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FDIS 1.26RSPD 1.12

FDIS and RSPD in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FDISBvsXLYA

    Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF · State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSPDCvsXLYA

    Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF · State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FDISBvsXRTB

    Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Retail ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSPDCvsXRTB

    Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Retail ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FDISBvsVCRB

    Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF · Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSPDCvsVCRB

    Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF · Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.