XLF ranks 1st and RSPF 11th of 18 funds in the Financials (Broad) Category.
RSPF vs XLF
XLF −0.32pt a year
0.40%0.08%
XLF 561.9×the volume
58.8K33M
XLF +0.9pt
+12.3%+13.2%
RSPF vs XLF Performance
+38.5%+52.9%
- RSPF 0.40%
- XLF 0.08%, better
- RSPF $325M
- XLF $53.1B
- RSPF +12.2%, better
- XLF +9.6%
- RSPF 1.52%, better
- XLF 1.46%
- RSPF 78
- XLF 79
- RSPF 58.8K sh
- XLF 33M sh, better
- RSPF $82.38
- XLF $56.93
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RSPF | XLF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D35 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A77 | A85Higher |
| Risk | B56 | B57Higher |
| Tradability | D33 | A100Higher |
| Holdings | A88Higher | C42 |
| Durability | D39 | A81Higher |
Rank among Financials (Broad) funds
Same Category. RSPF and XLF are both graded against the same 18 Financials (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RSPFC
XLFA
In short
RSPF Most financials funds are really a bet on a few megabanks. RSPF spreads the S&P 500's financial sector evenly across about 80 names, so an insurer or an exchange operator carries the same weight as the biggest bank on the list.
XLF The 1998 original. XLF holds the S&P 500's financial sector, roughly 80 banks, insurers, card networks and exchanges, for 0.08% a year. Not the whole sector, the blue-chip end of it, and one of the most heavily traded ways to own it.
Stated mandate
RSPF The fund is designed to provide equal-weighted exposure to stocks in the financials sector.
XLF The fund seeks to track, before expenses, the price and yield performance of the Financial Select Sector Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RSPF vs XLF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RSPF vs XLF Cost
Overpaying RSPF vs XLF
$6,401
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RSPF 0.40%
$8,090
XLF 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RSPF | XLF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $147 | $576 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $575 | $2,218 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $1,689 | $6,401 |
- 0.40%RSPF
- 0.08%XLF, cheaper
- Middle half of Financials (Broad) funds
- Median 0.37%
XLF cheapest of 18 funds
RSPF 12th cheapest of 18 funds
RSPF vs XLF Dividends
- RSPF 1.52%, better
- XLF 1.46%
- RSPF $1.25
- XLF $0.83
- RSPF $0.29
- XLF $0.20
- RSPF Sep 21, 2026
- XLF Sep 21, 2026
- RSPF Sep 25, 2026
- XLF Sep 23, 2026
- RSPF Quarterly
- XLF Quarterly
Distribution history
RSPF vs XLF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- RSPF
- XLF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RSPF 16.6%XLF 15.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- RSPF 0.95XLF 1.13, better
- Worst fall
- RSPF −27.7%XLF −25.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- RSPF 0.87XLF 0.75
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





