VFH ranks 4th and RSPF 11th of 18 funds in the Financials (Broad) Category.
RSPF vs VFH
VFH −0.31pt a year
0.40%0.09%
VFH 9.8×the volume
58.8K579K
VFH +0.6pt
+12.3%+12.9%
RSPF vs VFH Performance
+38.5%+52.3%
- RSPF 0.40%
- VFH 0.09%, better
- RSPF $325M
- VFH $13.9B
- RSPF +12.2%, better
- VFH +9.6%
- RSPF 1.52%
- VFH 1.71%, better
- RSPF 78
- VFH 426
- RSPF 58.8K sh
- VFH 579K sh, better
- RSPF $82.38
- VFH $137.29
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RSPF | VFH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D35 | A88Higher |
| Mission | A77 | |
| Risk | B56Higher | C53 |
| Tradability | D33 | B56Higher |
| Holdings | A88Higher | C53 |
| Durability | D39 | A84Higher |
Rank among Financials (Broad) funds
Same Category. RSPF and VFH are both graded against the same 18 Financials (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RSPFC
VFHB
In short
RSPF Most financials funds are really a bet on a few megabanks. RSPF spreads the S&P 500's financial sector evenly across about 80 names, so an insurer or an exchange operator carries the same weight as the biggest bank on the list.
VFH Financials without the size filter. VFH holds roughly 400 US financial stocks, from the megabanks down to small regional lenders and insurers, for 0.09% a year.
Stated mandate
RSPF The fund is designed to provide equal-weighted exposure to stocks in the financials sector.
VFH VFH seeks to track the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Financials 25/50, providing passively managed, multicapitalization exposure to U.S. financial-sector equities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RSPF vs VFH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RSPF vs VFH Cost
Overpaying RSPF vs VFH
$6,192
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RSPF 0.40%
$8,090
VFH 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RSPF | VFH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $165 | $558 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $646 | $2,147 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $1,898 | $6,192 |
- 0.40%RSPF
- 0.09%VFH, cheaper
- Middle half of Financials (Broad) funds
- Median 0.37%
VFH 3rd cheapest of 18 funds
RSPF 12th cheapest of 18 funds
RSPF vs VFH Dividends
- RSPF 1.52%
- VFH 1.71%, better
- RSPF $1.25
- VFH $2.35
- RSPF $0.29
- VFH $0.45
- RSPF Sep 21, 2026
- VFH Sep 23, 2026
- RSPF Sep 25, 2026
- VFH Sep 25, 2026
- RSPF Quarterly
- VFH Quarterly
Distribution history
RSPF vs VFH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- RSPF
- VFH
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RSPF 16.6%VFH 15.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- RSPF 0.95VFH 1.11, better
- Worst fall
- RSPF −27.7%VFH −25.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- RSPF 0.87VFH 0.82
RSPF and VFH in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
