Skip to content

RSPF vs VFH

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF

RSPFCNYSE Arca

Vanguard Financials ETF

VFHBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

VFH −0.31pt a year

RSPF0.40%VFH0.09%

Avg volume · 30D

VFH 9.8×the volume

RSPF58.8KVFH579K

10Y return · a year

VFH +0.6pt

RSPF+12.3%VFH+12.9%

RSPF vs VFH Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+38.5%RSPF+52.3%VFH

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. RSPF +38.5%. VFH +52.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
RSPF 0.40%
VFH 0.09%, better
Fund size
RSPF $325M
VFH $13.9B
1Y total return
RSPF +12.2%, better
VFH +9.6%
Yield (12M)
RSPF 1.52%
VFH 1.71%, better
Holdings
RSPF 78
VFH 426
Avg volume (30D)
RSPF 58.8K sh
VFH 579K sh, better
NAV per share
RSPF $82.38
VFH $137.29
52W range

ETF.net Grade

RSPF: Cost 35, Risk 56, Mission 77, Tradability 33, Holdings 88, Durability 39. VFH: Cost 88, Risk 53, Mission not scored, Tradability 56, Holdings 53, Durability 84.
Pillar letters and Scores for RSPF, VFH, with each pillar’s weight
PillarRSPFVFH
Cost30% weightD35A88Higher
Mission25% weightA77Not scored
Risk15% weightB56HigherC53
Tradability15% weightD33B56Higher
Holdings10% weightA88HigherC53
Durability5% weightD39A84Higher

Rank among Financials (Broad) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. RSPF and VFH are both graded against the same 18 Financials (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Financials (Broad)⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

VFH ranks 4th and RSPF 11th of 18 funds in the Financials (Broad) Category.

  1. Rank 1AXLFState Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETFScore 82
  2. Rank 2AFNCLFidelity MSCI Financials Index ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3AKIEState Street SPDR S&P Insurance ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 4BVFHVanguard Financials ETFScore 69
  5. Rank 5BIXGiShares Global Financials ETFScore 66
  6. Rank 10BFXOFirst Trust Financials AlphaDEX FundScore 56
  7. Rank 11CRSPFInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETFScore 53
  8. Rank 12CIYGiShares U.S. Financial Services ETFScore 50

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

RSPFCInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF

VFHBVanguard Financials ETF

In short

RSPF Most financials funds are really a bet on a few megabanks. RSPF spreads the S&P 500's financial sector evenly across about 80 names, so an insurer or an exchange operator carries the same weight as the biggest bank on the list.

VFH Financials without the size filter. VFH holds roughly 400 US financial stocks, from the megabanks down to small regional lenders and insurers, for 0.09% a year.

Stated mandate

RSPF The fund is designed to provide equal-weighted exposure to stocks in the financials sector.

VFH VFH seeks to track the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Financials 25/50, providing passively managed, multicapitalization exposure to U.S. financial-sector equities.

Why people hold it

  • RSPF Equal weight, rebalanced quarterly: winners get trimmed and laggards topped back up, instead of letting the largest banks quietly run the portfolio.invesco.com
  • A 0.40% expense ratio, slightly under the typical fund in the financials cohort, for a rules-based tilt rather than a manager's judgment call.
  • Sticks closely to the index it names, the S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials, and holds the sector broadly rather than skimming the headline names.
  • Trading since 2006, so the equal-weight method has been through the 2008 banking blowup and the 2023 regional bank scare with the same rulebook.
  • VFH Owns the whole sector, not just the giants: roughly 400 US financial names through MSCI's US IMI Financials 25/50 index, megabanks through small regional lenders and insurers.vanguard.com
  • Costs 0.09% a year, a fraction of what the typical broad financials fund charges.vanguard.com
  • Running since 2004, now a multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, and it has stayed close to its index. One of the strongest implementations in the financials group.
  • Pays out quarterly, passively managed, no manager stock-picking inside the sector.

Worth knowing

  • RSPF The tilt costs extra: cap-weighted rivals XLF (0.08%) and VFH (0.09%) charge a fraction of RSPF's 0.40% for plain sector exposure.
  • Thinly traded next to the sector's biggest funds, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads, especially on larger orders.
  • Equal weighting leaves more room for regional banks and insurers, so results can diverge from the cap-weighted sector in either direction.invesco.com
  • VFH One sector, one storyline: banks, insurers and brokers tend to move together with interest rates and the credit cycle.
  • The multicap reach cuts both ways. Small regional banks and niche insurers ride along with the megacaps, and they can swing harder.
  • Cost isn't the edge here: XLF and FNCL sit at essentially the same fee. Breadth of coverage is the real differentiator.

Full RSPF profile⁠

Full VFH profile⁠

RSPF vs VFH Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

RSPF vs VFH Cost

Overpaying RSPF vs VFH

$6,192

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • RSPF 0.40%

    $8,090

  • VFH 0.09%

    $1,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • RSPF 0.40%
  • VFH 0.09%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530RSPF $8,090VFH $1,898

Year by year

YearRSPFVFHOverpaying
10$723$165$558
20$2,793$646$2,147
30$8,090$1,898$6,192

Expense ratio

  • 0.40%RSPF
  • 0.09%VFH, cheaper
  • Middle half of Financials (Broad) funds
  • Median 0.37%

VFH 3rd cheapest of 18 funds

RSPF 12th cheapest of 18 funds

RSPF vs VFH Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
RSPF 1.52%
VFH 1.71%, better
Payout (12M)
RSPF $1.25
VFH $2.35
Last payment
RSPF $0.29
VFH $0.45
Ex-dividend
RSPF Sep 21, 2026
VFH Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
RSPF Sep 25, 2026
VFH Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
RSPF Quarterly
VFH Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

RSPFQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll RSPF payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.20; Jun 16, 2017 $0.14; Sep 15, 2017 $0.15; Dec 15, 2017 $0.08; Mar 16, 2018 $0.22; Jun 15, 2018 $0.20; Sep 24, 2018 $0.21; Dec 24, 2018 $0.27; Mar 18, 2019 $0.25; Jun 24, 2019 $0.21; Sep 23, 2019 $0.22; Dec 23, 2019 $0.20; Mar 23, 2020 $0.27; Jun 22, 2020 $0.31; Sep 21, 2020 $0.25; Dec 21, 2020 $0.24; Mar 22, 2021 $0.26; Jun 21, 2021 $0.21; Sep 20, 2021 $0.26; Dec 20, 2021 $0.27; Mar 21, 2022 $0.27; Jun 21, 2022 $0.29; Sep 19, 2022 $0.28; Dec 19, 2022 $0.26; Mar 20, 2023 $0.32; Jun 20, 2023 $0.32; Sep 18, 2023 $0.30; Dec 18, 2023 $0.33; Mar 18, 2024 $0.31; Jun 24, 2024 $0.28; Sep 23, 2024 $0.29; Dec 23, 2024 $0.32; Mar 24, 2025 $0.33; Jun 23, 2025 $0.30; Sep 22, 2025 $0.30; Dec 22, 2025 $0.29; Mar 23, 2026 $0.38; Jun 22, 2026 $0.29; Sep 21, 2026 $0.29. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
VFHQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll VFH payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.15; Jun 28, 2017 $0.27; Sep 27, 2017 $0.31; Dec 14, 2017 $0.35; Mar 16, 2018 $0.25; Jun 28, 2018 $0.36; Sep 24, 2018 $0.35; Dec 13, 2018 $0.40; Mar 21, 2019 $0.36; Jun 21, 2019 $0.38; Sep 26, 2019 $0.46; Dec 16, 2019 $0.46; Mar 10, 2020 $0.37; Jun 22, 2020 $0.41; Sep 11, 2020 $0.36; Dec 17, 2020 $0.48; Mar 26, 2021 $0.38; Jun 21, 2021 $0.37; Sep 29, 2021 $0.54; Dec 16, 2021 $0.51; Mar 24, 2022 $0.41; Jun 23, 2022 $0.41; Sep 28, 2022 $0.47; Dec 15, 2022 $0.62; Mar 24, 2023 $0.44; Jun 29, 2023 $0.44; Sep 28, 2023 $0.50; Dec 19, 2023 $0.54; Mar 22, 2024 $0.40; Jun 28, 2024 $0.46; Sep 27, 2024 $0.55; Dec 18, 2024 $0.66; Mar 25, 2025 $0.51; Jun 26, 2025 $0.47; Sep 24, 2025 $0.42; Dec 17, 2025 $0.67; Mar 24, 2026 $0.38; Jun 24, 2026 $0.85; Sep 23, 2026 $0.45. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

RSPF vs VFH Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • RSPF
  • VFH
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: RSPF −27.7% · May 2023. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
RSPF 16.6%VFH 15.9%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
RSPF 0.95VFH 1.11, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
RSPF −27.7%VFH −25.7%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
RSPF 0.87VFH 0.82

RSPF and VFH in the news

Popular comparisons

  • RSPFCvsXLFA

    Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF · State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VFHBvsXLFA

    Vanguard Financials ETF · State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSPFCvsFNCLA

    Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF · Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VFHBvsFNCLA

    Vanguard Financials ETF · Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSPFCvsKIEA

    Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Insurance ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VFHBvsKIEA

    Vanguard Financials ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Insurance ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.