FNCL ranks 2nd and RSPF 11th of 18 funds in the Financials (Broad) Category.
FNCL vs RSPF
FNCL −0.32pt a year
0.08%0.40%
FNCL 2.1×the volume
123K58.8K
FNCL +0.6pt
+12.9%+12.3%
FNCL vs RSPF Performance
+52.4%+38.5%
- FNCL 0.08%, better
- RSPF 0.40%
- FNCL $2.24B
- RSPF $325M
- FNCL +9.6%
- RSPF +12.2%, better
- FNCL 1.61%, better
- RSPF 1.52%
- FNCL 386
- RSPF 78
- FNCL 123K sh, better
- RSPF 58.8K sh
- FNCL $79.91
- RSPF $82.38
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FNCL | RSPF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | D35 |
| Mission | A81Higher | A77 |
| Risk | C53 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | A71Higher | D33 |
| Holdings | C54 | A88Higher |
| Durability | B56Higher | D39 |
Rank among Financials (Broad) funds
Same Category. FNCL and RSPF are both graded against the same 18 Financials (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FNCLA
RSPFC
In short
FNCL The whole financial food chain in one cheap wrapper: FNCL tracks an MSCI index of about 400 US banks, insurers, exchanges and payment names for 0.08% a year.
RSPF Most financials funds are really a bet on a few megabanks. RSPF spreads the S&P 500's financial sector evenly across about 80 names, so an insurer or an exchange operator carries the same weight as the biggest bank on the list.
Stated mandate
FNCL The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Financials Index.
RSPF The fund is designed to provide equal-weighted exposure to stocks in the financials sector.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FNCL vs RSPF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FNCL vs RSPF Cost
Overpaying RSPF vs FNCL
$6,317
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FNCL 0.084%
$1,773
RSPF 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FNCL | RSPF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $154 | $723 | $569 |
| 20 | $603 | $2,793 | $2,190 |
| 30 | $1,773 | $8,090 | $6,317 |
- 0.08%FNCL, cheaper
- 0.40%RSPF
- Middle half of Financials (Broad) funds
- Median 0.37%
FNCL 2nd cheapest of 18 funds
RSPF 12th cheapest of 18 funds
FNCL vs RSPF Dividends
- FNCL 1.61%, better
- RSPF 1.52%
- FNCL $1.29
- RSPF $1.25
- FNCL $0.31
- RSPF $0.29
- FNCL Sep 18, 2026
- RSPF Sep 21, 2026
- FNCL Sep 22, 2026
- RSPF Sep 25, 2026
- FNCL Quarterly
- RSPF Quarterly
Distribution history
FNCL vs RSPF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FNCL
- RSPF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FNCL 15.8%, betterRSPF 16.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- FNCL 1.11, betterRSPF 0.95
- Worst fall
- FNCL −25.7%, betterRSPF −27.7%
- Market sensitivity
- FNCL 0.92RSPF 0.87
FNCL and RSPF in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
