SCHA ranks 1st and RSSL 8th of 16 funds in the US Small-Cap Category.
RSSL vs SCHA
SCHA −0.05pt a year
0.08%0.03%
SCHA 233.3×the volume
13.1K3.06M
RSSL vs SCHA Performance
+14.7%+18.9%
- RSSL 0.08%
- SCHA 0.03%, better
- RSSL $1.45B
- SCHA $22B
- RSSL +14.7%
- SCHA +18.9%, better
- RSSL 1.34%, better
- SCHA 1.12%
- RSSL 1977
- SCHA 1743
- RSSL 13.1K sh
- SCHA 3.06M sh, better
- RSSL $109.29
- SCHA $33.00
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RSSL | SCHA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B69 | A91Higher |
| Mission | A100Higher | A95 |
| Risk | D26 | C40Higher |
| Tradability | C50 | A86Higher |
| Holdings | A71 | A81Higher |
| Durability | D31 | A77Higher |
Rank among US Small-Cap funds
Same Category. RSSL and SCHA are both graded against the same 16 US Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RSSLB
SCHAA
In short
RSSL A 2024 arrival that owns the whole Russell 2000 (about 2,000 US small caps) for eight basis points, undercutting the index's famous incumbent. Same neighborhood, cheaper toll.
SCHA Schwab's small-cap workhorse: three basis points, roughly 1,700 companies, and a mandate to hold the slice of the US market that sits below the large and mid caps. Running since 2009.
Stated mandate
RSSL The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Russell 2000 RIC Capped Index before fees and expenses.
SCHA The fund seeks to closely track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. It generally invests in that index’s small-cap stocks and normally places at least 90% of net assets in them.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RSSL vs SCHA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RSSL vs SCHA Cost
Overpaying RSSL vs SCHA
$1,051
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RSSL 0.08%
$1,689
SCHA 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RSSL | SCHA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $55 | $92 |
| 20 | $575 | $216 | $359 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $638 | $1,051 |
- 0.08%RSSL
- 0.03%SCHA, cheaper
- Middle half of US Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.20%
SCHA cheapest of 16 funds
RSSL 5th cheapest of 16 funds
RSSL vs SCHA Dividends
- RSSL 1.34%, better
- SCHA 1.12%
- RSSL $1.46
- SCHA $0.37
- RSSL $0.41
- SCHA $0.10
- RSSL Oct 5, 2026
- SCHA Sep 23, 2026
- RSSL Oct 8, 2026
- SCHA Sep 28, 2026
- RSSL Quarterly
- SCHA Quarterly
Distribution history
RSSL vs SCHA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RSSL 18.1%SCHA 18.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- RSSL 0.68SCHA 0.88
- Worst fall
- RSSL −27.8%SCHA −30.8%
- Market sensitivity
- RSSL 1.22SCHA 1.12
RSSL and SCHA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

