VB ranks 2nd and RSSL 8th of 16 funds in the US Small-Cap Category.
RSSL vs VB
VB −0.05pt a year
0.08%0.03%
VB 38.0×the volume
13.1K499K
RSSL vs VB Performance
+14.7%+15.3%
- RSSL 0.08%
- VB 0.03%, better
- RSSL $1.45B
- VB $176B
- RSSL +14.7%
- VB +15.3%, better
- RSSL 1.34%, better
- VB 1.26%
- RSSL 1977
- VB 1305
- RSSL 13.1K sh
- VB 499K sh, better
- RSSL $109.29
- VB $290.35
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RSSL | VB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B69 | A91Higher |
| Mission | A100Higher | A86 |
| Risk | D26 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | C50 | B57Higher |
| Holdings | A71Higher | B59 |
| Durability | D31 | A91Higher |
Rank among US Small-Cap funds
Same Category. RSSL and VB are both graded against the same 16 US Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RSSLB
VBA
In short
RSSL A 2024 arrival that owns the whole Russell 2000 (about 2,000 US small caps) for eight basis points, undercutting the index's famous incumbent. Same neighborhood, cheaper toll.
VB Vanguard's small-cap workhorse: roughly 1,400 smaller US companies for three basis points. The CRSP index behind it shifts stocks between size bands in two half steps instead of one jump, which holds turnover down. Trading since 2004.
Stated mandate
RSSL The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Russell 2000 RIC Capped Index before fees and expenses.
VB The fund seeks to track the CRSP US Small Cap Index, which measures the investment performance of small U.S. companies. It uses an indexing approach and generally replicates the index by holding its securities in approximately their index weights.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RSSL vs VB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RSSL vs VB Cost
Overpaying RSSL vs VB
$1,051
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RSSL 0.08%
$1,689
VB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RSSL | VB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $55 | $92 |
| 20 | $575 | $216 | $359 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $638 | $1,051 |
- 0.08%RSSL
- 0.03%VB, cheaper
- Middle half of US Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.20%
VB cheapest of 16 funds
RSSL 5th cheapest of 16 funds
RSSL vs VB Dividends
- RSSL 1.34%, better
- VB 1.26%
- RSSL $1.46
- VB $3.65
- RSSL $0.41
- VB $0.85
- RSSL Oct 5, 2026
- VB Sep 28, 2026
- RSSL Oct 8, 2026
- VB Sep 30, 2026
- RSSL Quarterly
- VB Quarterly
Distribution history
RSSL vs VB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RSSL 18.1%VB 16.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- RSSL 0.68VB 0.89
- Worst fall
- RSSL −27.8%VB −28.2%
- Market sensitivity
- RSSL 1.22VB 1.07
RSSL and VB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



