SCHZ ranks 2nd and UNIY 28th of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
SCHZ vs UNIY
SCHZ −0.12pt a year
0.03%0.15%
SCHZ 232.4×the volume
2.37M10.2K
UNIY +0.2pt
+5.4%+5.6%
SCHZ vs UNIY Performance
−0.2%−0.4%
- SCHZ 0.03%, better
- UNIY 0.15%
- SCHZ $10.8B
- UNIY $1.3B
- SCHZ −0.2%, better
- UNIY −0.4%
- SCHZ 4.27%
- UNIY 4.99%, better
- SCHZ 12610
- UNIY 5856
- SCHZ 2.37M sh, better
- UNIY 10.2K sh
- SCHZ $22.54
- UNIY $46.86
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SCHZ | UNIY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | A78 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C47 | C47 |
| Tradability | A85Higher | C48 |
| Holdings | A78Higher | A71 |
| Durability | A88Higher | B58 |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. SCHZ and UNIY are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SCHZA
UNIYA
In short
SCHZ Schwab's core bond holding: the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market, over 10,000 issues deep, for 0.03% a year. That is the floor of a category whose median fee is more than ten times higher. Running since 2011, pays monthly.
UNIY Most core bond funds copy the Agg and stop. UNIY follows a yield-enhanced version of the broader Bloomberg US Universal index, reshuffling the mix toward higher-yielding corners of the US dollar bond market, at a fraction of the typical category fee.
Stated mandate
SCHZ The fund seeks to track the total return of an index representing the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market.
UNIY The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg US Universal Enhanced Yield Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SCHZ vs UNIY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SCHZ vs UNIY Cost
Overpaying UNIY vs SCHZ
$2,499
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SCHZ 0.03%
$638
UNIY 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SCHZ | UNIY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $274 | $219 |
| 20 | $216 | $1,071 | $855 |
| 30 | $638 | $3,137 | $2,499 |
- 0.03%SCHZ, cheaper
- 0.15%UNIY
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
SCHZ 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
UNIY 24th cheapest of 114 funds
SCHZ vs UNIY Dividends
- SCHZ 4.27%
- UNIY 4.99%, better
- SCHZ $0.96
- UNIY $2.33
- SCHZ $0.08
- UNIY $0.21
- SCHZ Oct 1, 2026
- UNIY Oct 27, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 7, 2026
- UNIY Oct 29, 2026
- SCHZ Monthly
- UNIY Monthly
Distribution history
SCHZ vs UNIY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SCHZ 5.6%UNIY 5.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SCHZ 0.17UNIY 0.21, better
- Worst fall
- SCHZ −17.5%UNIY −6.3%
- Market sensitivity
- SCHZ 0.99UNIY 0.96
SCHZ and UNIY in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
