SOXL ranks 4th and WEBL 14th of 30 funds in the 3x Leveraged Long Category.
SOXL vs WEBL
SOXL −0.21pt a year
0.75%0.96%
SOXL 364.4×the volume
70.7M194K
SOXL +34.3pt
+10.8%−23.5%
SOXL vs WEBL Performance
+66.7%−73.8%
- SOXL 0.75%, better
- WEBL 0.96%
- SOXL $24.3B
- WEBL $74M
- SOXL +61.4%, better
- WEBL −34.2%
- SOXL 0.12%
- WEBL 0.21%, better
- SOXL 43
- WEBL 47
- SOXL 70.7M sh, better
- WEBL 194K sh
- SOXL $102.45
- WEBL $24.21
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SOXL | WEBL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | B62 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D32Higher | D31 |
| Tradability | A79Higher | C41 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B69Higher | D32 |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Long funds
Same Category. SOXL and WEBL are both graded against the same 30 3x Leveraged Long funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SOXLA
WEBLC
In short
SOXL A 3x bet on chip stocks that resets every single day. Direxion launched it in 2010, long before AI made semiconductors the market's main event, and it is now one of the most heavily traded leveraged funds out there.
WEBL Most 3x funds crank up the Dow or the Nasdaq. WEBL aims at a narrower target: 300% of the daily move of the Dow Jones Internet Composite, a basket of US internet names. Direxion has run it since 2019.
Stated mandate
SOXL It is designed to deliver a daily result three times the performance of the NYSE Semiconductor Index, before fees and expenses, with the objective applying for a single day.
WEBL The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 300% of the performance of the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SOXL vs WEBL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SOXL vs WEBL Cost
Overpaying WEBL vs SOXL
$3,552
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SOXL 0.75%
$14,482
WEBL 0.96%
$18,034
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SOXL | WEBL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $1,695 | $359 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $6,383 | $1,305 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $18,034 | $3,552 |
- 0.75%SOXL, cheaper
- 0.96%WEBL
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Long funds
- Median 0.96%
SOXL cheapest of 30 funds
WEBL 11th cheapest of 30 funds
SOXL vs WEBL Dividends
- SOXL 0.12%
- WEBL 0.21%, better
- SOXL $0.09
- WEBL $0.05
- SOXL $0.09
- WEBL $0.0041
- SOXL Sep 22, 2026
- WEBL Sep 22, 2026
- SOXL Sep 29, 2026
- WEBL Sep 29, 2026
- SOXL Annual
- WEBL Quarterly
Distribution history
SOXL vs WEBL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SOXL
- WEBL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SOXL 137.2%WEBL 62.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SOXL 0.90, betterWEBL 0.73
- Worst fall
- SOXL −90.5%, betterWEBL −94.2%
- Market sensitivity
- SOXL 7.64WEBL 4.11
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.88%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.88%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.