UDOW ranks 2nd and WEBL 14th of 30 funds in the 3x Leveraged Long Category.
UDOW vs WEBL
UDOW −0.02pt a year
0.94%0.96%
UDOW 8.9×the volume
1.72M194K
UDOW +34.2pt
+10.7%−23.5%
UDOW vs WEBL Performance
+66.5%−73.8%
- UDOW 0.94%, better
- WEBL 0.96%
- UDOW $841M
- WEBL $74M
- UDOW +16.0%, better
- WEBL −34.2%
- UDOW 1.06%, better
- WEBL 0.21%
- UDOW 33
- WEBL 47
- UDOW 1.72M sh, better
- WEBL 194K sh
- UDOW $65.43
- WEBL $24.21
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | UDOW | WEBL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78Higher | B62 |
| Mission | A77 | |
| Risk | A85Higher | D31 |
| Tradability | A89Higher | C41 |
| Holdings | B56 | |
| Durability | A71Higher | D32 |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Long funds
Same Category. UDOW and WEBL are both graded against the same 30 3x Leveraged Long funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
UDOWA
WEBLC
In short
UDOW The only 3x daily play on the Dow: 30 blue-chip names, price-weighted, reset every session. It is the industrial cousin of the semis-and-Nasdaq crowd that fills the leveraged aisle, and it has run since 2010.
WEBL Most 3x funds crank up the Dow or the Nasdaq. WEBL aims at a narrower target: 300% of the daily move of the Dow Jones Internet Composite, a basket of US internet names. Direxion has run it since 2019.
Stated mandate
UDOW The Fund seeks daily results equal to three times the daily performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average before fees and expenses. It uses equity securities, derivatives, and money-market instruments to pursue that daily leveraged exposure.
WEBL The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 300% of the performance of the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
UDOW vs WEBL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
UDOW vs WEBL Cost
Overpaying WEBL vs UDOW
$330
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
UDOW 0.94%
$17,704
WEBL 0.96%
$18,034
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | UDOW | WEBL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,661 | $1,695 | $34 |
| 20 | $6,260 | $6,383 | $123 |
| 30 | $17,704 | $18,034 | $330 |
- 0.94%UDOW, cheaper
- 0.96%WEBL
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Long funds
- Median 0.96%
UDOW 7th cheapest of 30 funds
WEBL 11th cheapest of 30 funds
UDOW vs WEBL Dividends
- UDOW 1.06%, better
- WEBL 0.21%
- UDOW $0.69
- WEBL $0.05
- UDOW $0.15
- WEBL $0.0041
- UDOW Sep 23, 2026
- WEBL Sep 22, 2026
- UDOW Sep 29, 2026
- WEBL Sep 29, 2026
- UDOW Quarterly
- WEBL Quarterly
Distribution history
UDOW vs WEBL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- UDOW
- WEBL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- UDOW 37.2%, betterWEBL 62.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- UDOW 0.95, betterWEBL 0.73
- Worst fall
- UDOW −56.0%, betterWEBL −94.2%
- Market sensitivity
- UDOW 2.62WEBL 4.11
Popular comparisons
- 0.94% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.88%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.88%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.