TQQQ ranks 1st and WEBL 14th of 30 funds in the 3x Leveraged Long Category.
TQQQ vs WEBL
TQQQ −0.18pt a year
0.78%0.96%
TQQQ 296.7×the volume
57.5M194K
TQQQ +33.9pt
+10.4%−23.5%
TQQQ vs WEBL Performance
+64.2%−73.8%
- TQQQ 0.78%, better
- WEBL 0.96%
- TQQQ $32.1B
- WEBL $74M
- TQQQ +7.1%, better
- WEBL −34.2%
- TQQQ 0.78%, better
- WEBL 0.21%
- TQQQ 116
- WEBL 47
- TQQQ 57.5M sh, better
- WEBL 194K sh
- TQQQ $61.97
- WEBL $24.21
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | TQQQ | WEBL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | B62 |
| Mission | A84 | |
| Risk | B57Higher | D31 |
| Tradability | A97Higher | C41 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A79Higher | D32 |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Long funds
Same Category. TQQQ and WEBL are both graded against the same 30 3x Leveraged Long funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
TQQQA
WEBLC
In short
TQQQ The original 3x Nasdaq-100 trade, live since 2010. Leverage resets every day, chasing three times the index's one-day move, and it is one of the most heavily traded names in its corner of the market.
WEBL Most 3x funds crank up the Dow or the Nasdaq. WEBL aims at a narrower target: 300% of the daily move of the Dow Jones Internet Composite, a basket of US internet names. Direxion has run it since 2019.
Stated mandate
TQQQ The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to three times the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
WEBL The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 300% of the performance of the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
TQQQ vs WEBL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
TQQQ vs WEBL Cost
Overpaying WEBL vs TQQQ
$3,032
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
TQQQ 0.78%
$15,002
WEBL 0.96%
$18,034
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | TQQQ | WEBL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,388 | $1,695 | $307 |
| 20 | $5,268 | $6,383 | $1,115 |
| 30 | $15,002 | $18,034 | $3,032 |
- 0.78%TQQQ, cheaper
- 0.96%WEBL
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Long funds
- Median 0.96%
TQQQ 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
WEBL 11th cheapest of 30 funds
TQQQ vs WEBL Dividends
- TQQQ 0.78%, better
- WEBL 0.21%
- TQQQ $0.48
- WEBL $0.05
- TQQQ $0.16
- WEBL $0.0041
- TQQQ Sep 23, 2026
- WEBL Sep 22, 2026
- TQQQ Sep 29, 2026
- WEBL Sep 29, 2026
- TQQQ Quarterly
- WEBL Quarterly
Distribution history
TQQQ vs WEBL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- TQQQ
- WEBL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- TQQQ 56.9%, betterWEBL 62.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- TQQQ 0.98, betterWEBL 0.73
- Worst fall
- TQQQ −81.7%, betterWEBL −94.2%
- Market sensitivity
- TQQQ 3.71WEBL 4.11
Popular comparisons
- 0.78% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.78% · 0.88%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.88%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.78% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.