TMF ranks 4th and TYD 23rd of 30 funds in the 3x Leveraged Long Category.
TMF vs TYD
TMF −0.17pt a year
0.90%1.07%
TMF 207.0×the volume
5.85M28.2K
TYD +10.8pt
−15.8%−5.0%
TMF vs TYD Performance
−88.4%−54.4%
- TMF 0.90%, better
- TYD 1.07%
- TMF $1.96B
- TYD $31M
- TMF −22.7%
- TYD −13.7%, better
- TMF 4.62%, better
- TYD 3.76%
- TMF 14
- TYD 8
- TMF 5.85M sh, better
- TYD 28.2K sh
- TMF $30.21
- TYD $21.79
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | TMF | TYD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A87Higher | F13 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C49 | B61Higher |
| Tradability | A83Higher | C42 |
| Holdings | A100 | A100 |
| Durability | B65Higher | C41 |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Long funds
Same Category. TMF and TYD are both graded against the same 30 3x Leveraged Long funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
TMFA
TYDD
In short
TMF Three times the daily move of long-dated Treasuries, reset every day. Where most 3x funds aim at stocks, TMF points its leverage at the 20-year-plus end of the curve, and has been doing it since 2009.
TYD Leveraged Treasury trading mostly crowds the long end. TYD aims for 300% of the daily move in the ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index instead: a 3x handle on the belly of the curve, running since 2009.
Stated mandate
TMF The Fund seeks pre-fee and expense investment results equal to 300% of the daily performance of the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. It is designed for a single trading day, and longer-period results may differ because daily returns compound.
TYD The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 300% of the performance of the ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
TMF vs TYD Holdings
How TMF and TYD differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
Sector
No Sector split for TMF and TYD.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in TMFMore in TYD | Gap | TMF | TYD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- TMF91.3%
- TYD100.0%
- TMF4
- TYD3
Asset class
- TMF
- Bonds
- TYD
- Bonds
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. TMF holds 4 securities, TYD 3.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
TMF vs TYD Cost
Overpaying TYD vs TMF
$2,775
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
TMF 0.90%
$17,040
TYD 1.07%
$19,815
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | TMF | TYD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,593 | $1,881 | $288 |
| 20 | $6,015 | $7,046 | $1,031 |
| 30 | $17,040 | $19,815 | $2,775 |
- 0.90%TMF, cheaper
- 1.07%TYD
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Long funds
- Median 0.96%
TMF 5th cheapest of 30 funds
TYD 26th cheapest of 30 funds
TMF vs TYD Dividends
- TMF 4.62%, better
- TYD 3.76%
- TMF $1.40
- TYD $0.82
- TMF $0.35
- TYD $0.25
- TMF Sep 22, 2026
- TYD Sep 22, 2026
- TMF Sep 29, 2026
- TYD Sep 29, 2026
- TMF Quarterly
- TYD Quarterly
Distribution history
TMF vs TYD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- TMF
- TYD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- TMF 40.2%TYD 19.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- TMF −0.07TYD −0.06, better
- Worst fall
- TMF −90.9%TYD −59.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- TMF 7.22TYD 3.48
Popular comparisons
- 0.90% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.88%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.88%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.