FAS ranks 2nd and TYD 23rd of 30 funds in the 3x Leveraged Long Category.
FAS vs TYD
FAS −0.19pt a year
0.88%1.07%
FAS 14.8×the volume
417K28.2K
FAS +25.7pt
+20.7%−5.0%
FAS vs TYD Performance
+41.7%−54.4%
- FAS 0.88%, better
- TYD 1.07%
- FAS $2.08B
- TYD $31M
- FAS +17.0%, better
- TYD −13.7%
- FAS 8.32%, better
- TYD 3.76%
- FAS 87
- TYD 8
- FAS 417K sh, better
- TYD 28.2K sh
- FAS $168.58
- TYD $21.79
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FAS | TYD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | F13 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A73Higher | B61 |
| Tradability | B69Higher | C42 |
| Holdings | A100 | |
| Durability | B66Higher | C41 |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Long funds
Same Category. FAS and TYD are both graded against the same 30 3x Leveraged Long funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FASA
TYDD
In short
FAS Born in November 2008 with the banking system on fire, FAS aims to deliver three times the daily move of the Financial Select Sector Index. A one-day tool on roughly 80 financial stocks, built around a single-day objective.
TYD Leveraged Treasury trading mostly crowds the long end. TYD aims for 300% of the daily move in the ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index instead: a 3x handle on the belly of the curve, running since 2009.
Stated mandate
FAS The fund seeks a daily return equal to three times the performance of the Financial Select Sector Index, before fees and expenses. It is designed for a single-day objective rather than a multiple of the index’s cumulative return over longer periods.
TYD The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 300% of the performance of the ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FAS vs TYD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FAS vs TYD Cost
Overpaying TYD vs FAS
$3,110
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FAS 0.88%
$16,705
TYD 1.07%
$19,815
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FAS | TYD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,559 | $1,881 | $322 |
| 20 | $5,891 | $7,046 | $1,155 |
| 30 | $16,705 | $19,815 | $3,110 |
- 0.88%FAS, cheaper
- 1.07%TYD
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Long funds
- Median 0.96%
FAS 4th cheapest of 30 funds
TYD 26th cheapest of 30 funds
FAS vs TYD Dividends
- FAS 8.32%, better
- TYD 3.76%
- FAS $14.62
- TYD $0.82
- FAS $1.00
- TYD $0.25
- FAS Sep 22, 2026
- TYD Sep 22, 2026
- FAS Sep 29, 2026
- TYD Sep 29, 2026
- FAS Quarterly
- TYD Quarterly
Distribution history
FAS vs TYD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FAS
- TYD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FAS 46.3%TYD 19.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FAS 1.03, betterTYD −0.06
- Worst fall
- FAS −66.9%TYD −59.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FAS 2.56TYD 3.48
Popular comparisons
- 0.88% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.88% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.88% · 0.90%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.90%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.