VSGX ranks 1st and UMMA 18th of 18 funds in the International ESG & Values Index Category.
UMMA vs VSGX
VSGX −0.55pt a year
0.65%0.10%
VSGX 3.2×the volume
51.6K166K
UMMA +2.7pt
+23.4%+20.7%
UMMA vs VSGX Performance
+24.1%+14.4%
- UMMA 0.65%
- VSGX 0.10%, better
- UMMA $310M
- VSGX $6.7B
- UMMA +24.1%, better
- VSGX +14.4%
- UMMA 0.79%
- VSGX 3.11%, better
- UMMA 94
- VSGX 6667
- UMMA 51.6K sh
- VSGX 166K sh, better
- UMMA $36.24
- VSGX $77.91
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | UMMA | VSGX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F6 | A100Higher |
| Mission | F7 | A100Higher |
| Risk | F13 | C49Higher |
| Tradability | D35 | B64Higher |
| Holdings | F20 | B60Higher |
| Durability | C40 | A92Higher |
Rank among International ESG & Values Index funds
Same Category. UMMA and VSGX are both graded against the same 18 International ESG & Values Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
UMMAF
VSGXA
In short
UMMA Faith-based investing with a passport. UMMA screens international stocks against Dow Jones Islamic Market rules, so Shariah compliance and non-US equity exposure arrive in a single ticker.
VSGX Most ex-US ESG funds stop at big developed-market names. VSGX casts a wider net: large, mid and small caps across developed and emerging markets, minus the industries its index screens out, for 0.10% a year.
Stated mandate
UMMA The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
VSGX The Fund seeks to track an index of large-, mid-, and small-capitalization stocks from developed and emerging markets outside the United States, subject to environmental, social, and corporate-governance screening.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
UMMA vs VSGX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
UMMA vs VSGX Cost
Overpaying UMMA vs VSGX
$10,611
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
UMMA 0.65%
$12,717
VSGX 0.10%
$2,106
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | UMMA | VSGX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $183 | $980 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $717 | $3,723 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $2,106 | $10,611 |
- 0.65%UMMA
- 0.10%VSGX, cheaper
- Middle half of International ESG & Values Index funds
- Median 0.23%
VSGX cheapest of 18 funds
UMMA 17th cheapest of 18 funds
UMMA vs VSGX Dividends
- UMMA 0.79%
- VSGX 3.11%, better
- UMMA $0.28
- VSGX $2.43
- UMMA $0.15
- VSGX $0.47
- UMMA Sep 24, 2026
- VSGX Sep 18, 2026
- UMMA Sep 25, 2026
- VSGX Sep 22, 2026
- UMMA Quarterly
- VSGX Quarterly
Distribution history
UMMA vs VSGX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- UMMA 18.0%VSGX 12.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- UMMA 1.01VSGX 1.20, better
- Worst fall
- UMMA −34.2%VSGX −31.2%
- Market sensitivity
- UMMA 1.29VSGX 0.97
UMMA and VSGX in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
