FEDM ranks 4th and UMMA 18th of 18 funds in the International ESG & Values Index Category.
FEDM vs UMMA
FEDM −0.53pt a year
0.12%0.65%
UMMA 25.4×the volume
2.03K51.6K
UMMA +4.8pt
+18.6%+23.4%
FEDM vs UMMA Performance
+15.7%+24.1%
- FEDM 0.12%, better
- UMMA 0.65%
- FEDM $86M
- UMMA $310M
- FEDM +15.7%
- UMMA +24.1%, better
- FEDM 2.88%, better
- UMMA 0.79%
- FEDM 231
- UMMA 94
- FEDM 2.03K sh
- UMMA 51.6K sh, better
- FEDM $64.72
- UMMA $36.24
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FEDM | UMMA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88Higher | F6 |
| Mission | A100Higher | F7 |
| Risk | C53Higher | F13 |
| Tradability | D35 | D35 |
| Holdings | B60Higher | F20 |
| Durability | C40 | C40 |
Rank among International ESG & Values Index funds
Same Category. FEDM and UMMA are both graded against the same 18 International ESG & Values Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FEDMA
UMMAF
In short
FEDM Northern Trust writes the index and runs the fund: a developed-ex-US core holding screened on its own ESG and climate scoring, at 0.12% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.
UMMA Faith-based investing with a passport. UMMA screens international stocks against Dow Jones Islamic Market rules, so Shariah compliance and non-US equity exposure arrive in a single ticker.
Stated mandate
FEDM The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index.
UMMA The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FEDM vs UMMA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FEDM vs UMMA Cost
Overpaying UMMA vs FEDM
$10,197
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FEDM 0.12%
$2,520
UMMA 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FEDM | UMMA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $220 | $1,163 | $943 |
| 20 | $859 | $4,440 | $3,581 |
| 30 | $2,520 | $12,717 | $10,197 |
- 0.12%FEDM, cheaper
- 0.65%UMMA
- Middle half of International ESG & Values Index funds
- Median 0.23%
FEDM 2nd cheapest of 18 funds
UMMA 17th cheapest of 18 funds
FEDM vs UMMA Dividends
- FEDM 2.88%, better
- UMMA 0.79%
- FEDM $1.86
- UMMA $0.28
- FEDM $0.26
- UMMA $0.15
- FEDM Sep 18, 2026
- UMMA Sep 24, 2026
- FEDM Sep 24, 2026
- UMMA Sep 25, 2026
- FEDM Quarterly
- UMMA Quarterly
Distribution history
FEDM vs UMMA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FEDM 11.8%, betterUMMA 18.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- FEDM 1.14, betterUMMA 1.01
- Worst fall
- FEDM −29.4%UMMA −34.2%
- Market sensitivity
- FEDM 0.91UMMA 1.29
Popular comparisons
- 0.12% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.