DMXF ranks 3rd and UMMA 18th of 18 funds in the International ESG & Values Index Category.
DMXF vs UMMA
DMXF −0.53pt a year
0.12%0.65%
DMXF 1.5×the volume
75.7K51.6K
UMMA +4.8pt
+18.6%+23.4%
DMXF vs UMMA Performance
+14.0%+24.1%
- DMXF 0.12%, better
- UMMA 0.65%
- DMXF $1.04B
- UMMA $310M
- DMXF +14.0%
- UMMA +24.1%, better
- DMXF 4.22%, better
- UMMA 0.79%
- DMXF 408
- UMMA 94
- DMXF 75.7K sh, better
- UMMA 51.6K sh
- DMXF $83.48
- UMMA $36.24
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DMXF | UMMA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88Higher | F6 |
| Mission | A100Higher | F7 |
| Risk | D36Higher | F13 |
| Tradability | A74Higher | D35 |
| Holdings | C45Higher | F20 |
| Durability | A76Higher | C40 |
Rank among International ESG & Values Index funds
Same Category. DMXF and UMMA are both graded against the same 18 International ESG & Values Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DMXFA
UMMAF
In short
DMXF The strict one. Where iShares' ESG Aware EAFE fund screens five controversial businesses, DMXF screens fourteen, including the whole energy sector, and charges less than its lighter-screened sibling to do it.
UMMA Faith-based investing with a passport. UMMA screens international stocks against Dow Jones Islamic Market rules, so Shariah compliance and non-US equity exposure arrive in a single ticker.
Stated mandate
DMXF The fund seeks to track an index of developed-market equities outside the United States and Canada, while incorporating positive environmental, social, and governance characteristics.
UMMA The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DMXF vs UMMA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DMXF vs UMMA Cost
Overpaying UMMA vs DMXF
$10,197
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DMXF 0.12%
$2,520
UMMA 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DMXF | UMMA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $220 | $1,163 | $943 |
| 20 | $859 | $4,440 | $3,581 |
| 30 | $2,520 | $12,717 | $10,197 |
- 0.12%DMXF, cheaper
- 0.65%UMMA
- Middle half of International ESG & Values Index funds
- Median 0.23%
DMXF 2nd cheapest of 18 funds
UMMA 17th cheapest of 18 funds
DMXF vs UMMA Dividends
- DMXF 4.22%, better
- UMMA 0.79%
- DMXF $3.54
- UMMA $0.28
- DMXF $1.03
- UMMA $0.15
- DMXF Jun 15, 2026
- UMMA Sep 24, 2026
- DMXF Jun 18, 2026
- UMMA Sep 25, 2026
- DMXF Twice a year
- UMMA Quarterly
Distribution history
DMXF vs UMMA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DMXF 12.8%, betterUMMA 18.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- DMXF 1.06, betterUMMA 1.01
- Worst fall
- DMXF −33.7%UMMA −34.2%
- Market sensitivity
- DMXF 0.86UMMA 1.29
Popular comparisons
- 0.12% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.