XLK ranks 1st and IGM 5th of 23 funds in the Technology (Broad) Category.
IGM vs XLK
XLK −0.29pt a year
0.37%0.08%
XLK 24.7×the volume
336K8.32M
XLK +0.9pt
+23.6%+24.5%
IGM vs XLK Performance
+132.8%+146.4%
- IGM 0.37%
- XLK 0.08%, better
- IGM $10.9B
- XLK $123B
- IGM +21.7%
- XLK +27.1%, better
- IGM 0.14%
- XLK 0.44%, better
- IGM 295
- XLK 77
- IGM 336K sh
- XLK 8.32M sh, better
- IGM $159.31
- XLK $186.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IGM | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B65 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A84Higher | A76 |
| Risk | B66Higher | B56 |
| Tradability | A70 | A98Higher |
| Holdings | B59Higher | C41 |
| Durability | A79 | A82Higher |
Rank among Technology (Broad) funds
Same Category. IGM and XLK are both graded against the same 23 Technology (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IGMB
XLKA
In short
IGM Tech with the fence moved. IGM's index reaches past the classic tech sector to add selected communication-services names and Canadian listings, holding about 300 stocks. It has been running since 2001.
XLK A 1998 original: XLK owns the technology slice of the S&P 500, about 70 names, for eight basis points. Big, heavily traded, and top-heavy by design, with quarterly caps the only brake on the giants at the top.
Stated mandate
IGM The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. and Canadian technology companies together with selected communication-services companies.
XLK The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Technology Select Sector Index before expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IGM vs XLK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IGM vs XLK Cost
Overpaying IGM vs XLK
$5,824
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IGM 0.37%
$7,513
XLK 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IGM | XLK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $670 | $147 | $523 |
| 20 | $2,590 | $575 | $2,015 |
| 30 | $7,513 | $1,689 | $5,824 |
- 0.37%IGM
- 0.08%XLK, cheaper
- Middle half of Technology (Broad) funds
- Median 0.45%
XLK cheapest of 23 funds
IGM 7th cheapest of 23 funds
IGM vs XLK Dividends
- IGM 0.14%
- XLK 0.44%, better
- IGM $0.22
- XLK $0.83
- IGM $0.05
- XLK $0.22
- IGM Sep 15, 2026
- XLK Sep 21, 2026
- IGM Sep 18, 2026
- XLK Sep 23, 2026
- IGM Quarterly
- XLK Quarterly
Distribution history
IGM vs XLK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IGM
- XLK
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IGM 22.2%, betterXLK 22.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- IGM 1.40, betterXLK 1.23
- Worst fall
- IGM −40.7%XLK −33.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- IGM 1.40XLK 1.35
IGM and XLK in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.37% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





