Skip to content

IGM vs XLK

iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF

IGMBNYSE Arca

State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF

XLKANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

XLK −0.29pt a year

IGM0.37%XLK0.08%

Avg volume · 30D

XLK 24.7×the volume

IGM336KXLK8.32M

10Y return · a year

XLK +0.9pt

IGM+23.6%XLK+24.5%

IGM vs XLK Performance

Oct 28, 2021 – Oct 28, 2026

+132.8%IGM+146.4%XLK

Oct 28, 2021 to Oct 28, 2026. IGM +132.8%. XLK +146.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%50%100%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
IGM 0.37%
XLK 0.08%, better
Fund size
IGM $10.9B
XLK $123B
1Y total return
IGM +21.7%
XLK +27.1%, better
Yield (12M)
IGM 0.14%
XLK 0.44%, better
Holdings
IGM 295
XLK 77
Avg volume (30D)
IGM 336K sh
XLK 8.32M sh, better
NAV per share
IGM $159.31
XLK $186.31
52W range

ETF.net Grade

IGM: Cost 65, Risk 66, Mission 84, Tradability 70, Holdings 59, Durability 79. XLK: Cost 98, Risk 56, Mission 76, Tradability 98, Holdings 41, Durability 82.
Pillar letters and Scores for IGM, XLK, with each pillar’s weight
PillarIGMXLK
Cost30% weightB65A98Higher
Mission25% weightA84HigherA76
Risk15% weightB66HigherB56
Tradability15% weightA70A98Higher
Holdings10% weightB59HigherC41
Durability5% weightA79A82Higher

Rank among Technology (Broad) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. IGM and XLK are both graded against the same 23 Technology (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Technology (Broad)⁠

Category · 23 funds
See all 23 ›

XLK ranks 1st and IGM 5th of 23 funds in the Technology (Broad) Category.

  1. Rank 1AXLKState Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETFScore 80
  2. Rank 2AFTECFidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETFScore 77
  3. Rank 4BRSPTInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETFScore 68
  4. Rank 5BIGMiShares Expanded Tech Sector ETFScore 65
  5. Rank 5BXNTKState Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETFScore 65

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

IGMBiShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF

XLKAState Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF

In short

IGM Tech with the fence moved. IGM's index reaches past the classic tech sector to add selected communication-services names and Canadian listings, holding about 300 stocks. It has been running since 2001.

XLK A 1998 original: XLK owns the technology slice of the S&P 500, about 70 names, for eight basis points. Big, heavily traded, and top-heavy by design, with quarterly caps the only brake on the giants at the top.

Stated mandate

IGM The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. and Canadian technology companies together with selected communication-services companies.

XLK The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Technology Select Sector Index before expenses.

Why people hold it

  • IGM The "expanded" part is the whole point: the index pairs U.S. and Canadian technology companies with selected communication-services names, so internet and media businesses that pure tech-sector funds exclude are in the mix.ishares.com
  • About 300 holdings across two countries, a wider net than sector funds drawn only from the S&P 500.
  • Launched in March 2001, it is one of the long-running names in tech ETFs, now a multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively.
  • Tracking has been tight: the portfolio has stayed close to the S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index it promises, and it is among the stronger implementations in the broad tech group.
  • XLK Costs 0.08% a year against a roughly 0.40% median for broad tech funds, tying FTEC as the cheapest of the category's top-rated names and undercutting VGT's 0.09%.
  • One of the largest and most actively traded funds in the tech aisle, so entering or exiting rarely means fighting the order book.
  • Running since December 1998 and dead simple: the tech sector of the S&P 500, spanning software, semiconductors, hardware, communications equipment and IT services. Pays quarterly.ssga.com

Worth knowing

  • IGM Fees are the trade-off. At 0.37% it sits just under the broad-tech median, but plain tech trackers VGT, XLK and FTEC charge under 0.10% for a narrower mandate.
  • This is one slice of the market: North American tech plus some communication services, and nothing else. When that corner moves, the whole fund moves with it.
  • Distributions come quarterly, but a growth-sector equity basket is built around the companies, not the payout.
  • XLK Top-heavy by construction. About 70 stocks, and the index only trims its biggest weights at quarterly rebalances to stay inside fund diversification limits.spglobal.com
  • The universe is S&P 500 tech only. Smaller tech companies outside the big index are out, and the Select Sector funds split the S&P 500 up, so some familiar names sit in other sector funds.ssga.com
  • It is one sector with no ballast from the rest of the market, so a tech drawdown lands here in full.

Full IGM profile⁠

Full XLK profile⁠

IGM vs XLK Holdings

Holdings as of Oct 28, 2026 for IGM and Oct 27, 2026 for XLK

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

IGM vs XLK Cost

Overpaying IGM vs XLK

$5,824

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • IGM 0.37%

    $7,513

  • XLK 0.08%

    $1,689

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • IGM 0.37%
  • XLK 0.08%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530IGM $7,513XLK $1,689

Year by year

YearIGMXLKOverpaying
10$670$147$523
20$2,590$575$2,015
30$7,513$1,689$5,824

Expense ratio

  • 0.37%IGM
  • 0.08%XLK, cheaper
  • Middle half of Technology (Broad) funds
  • Median 0.45%

XLK cheapest of 23 funds

IGM 7th cheapest of 23 funds

IGM vs XLK Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 28, 2026
Yield (12M)
IGM 0.14%
XLK 0.44%, better
Payout (12M)
IGM $0.22
XLK $0.83
Last payment
IGM $0.05
XLK $0.22
Ex-dividend
IGM Sep 15, 2026
XLK Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
IGM Sep 18, 2026
XLK Sep 23, 2026
Frequency
IGM Quarterly
XLK Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

IGMQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll IGM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.04; Jun 27, 2017 $0.05; Sep 26, 2017 $0.04; Dec 19, 2017 $0.04; Mar 22, 2018 $0.04; Jun 26, 2018 $0.05; Sep 26, 2018 $0.04; Dec 17, 2018 $0.04; Mar 20, 2019 $0.05; Jun 17, 2019 $0.06; Sep 24, 2019 $0.04; Dec 16, 2019 $0.05; Mar 25, 2020 $0.07; Jun 15, 2020 $0.05; Sep 23, 2020 $0.04; Dec 14, 2020 $0.03; Mar 25, 2021 $0.04; Jun 10, 2021 $0.02; Sep 24, 2021 $0.03; Dec 13, 2021 $0.03; Mar 24, 2022 $0.03; Jun 9, 2022 $0.04; Sep 26, 2022 $0.06; Dec 13, 2022 $0.18; Mar 23, 2023 $0.06; Jun 7, 2023 $0.03; Sep 26, 2023 $0.07; Dec 20, 2023 $0.14; Mar 21, 2024 $0.04; Jun 11, 2024 $0.04; Sep 25, 2024 $0.09; Dec 17, 2024 $0.05; Mar 18, 2025 $0.05; Jun 16, 2025 $0.06; Sep 16, 2025 $0.05; Dec 16, 2025 $0.06; Mar 17, 2026 $0.04; Jun 15, 2026 $0.07; Sep 15, 2026 $0.05. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD
XLKQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll XLK payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.10; Jun 16, 2017 $0.11; Sep 15, 2017 $0.10; Dec 15, 2017 $0.12; Mar 16, 2018 $0.11; Jun 15, 2018 $0.13; Sep 21, 2018 $0.13; Dec 21, 2018 $0.13; Mar 15, 2019 $0.12; Jun 21, 2019 $0.14; Sep 20, 2019 $0.13; Dec 20, 2019 $0.15; Mar 23, 2020 $0.19; Jun 22, 2020 $0.14; Sep 21, 2020 $0.12; Dec 21, 2020 $0.15; Mar 22, 2021 $0.14; Jun 21, 2021 $0.13; Sep 20, 2021 $0.14; Dec 20, 2021 $0.16; Mar 21, 2022 $0.14; Jun 21, 2022 $0.16; Sep 19, 2022 $0.16; Dec 19, 2022 $0.18; Mar 20, 2023 $0.16; Jun 20, 2023 $0.18; Sep 18, 2023 $0.18; Dec 18, 2023 $0.21; Mar 18, 2024 $0.17; Jun 24, 2024 $0.20; Sep 23, 2024 $0.20; Dec 23, 2024 $0.19; Mar 24, 2025 $0.19; Jun 23, 2025 $0.20; Sep 22, 2025 $0.18; Dec 22, 2025 $0.22; Mar 23, 2026 $0.17; Jun 22, 2026 $0.23; Sep 21, 2026 $0.22. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD

IGM vs XLK Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • IGM
  • XLK
Oct 28, 2021 to Oct 28, 2026. Worst fall: IGM −40.7% · Nov 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−40%−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
IGM 22.2%, betterXLK 22.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
IGM 1.40, betterXLK 1.23
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
IGM −40.7%XLK −33.6%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
IGM 1.40XLK 1.35

IGM and XLK in the news

Popular comparisons

  • IGMBvsFTECA

    iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF · Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.37% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XLKAvsFTECA

    State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF · Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IGMBvsVGTA

    iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF · Vanguard Information Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.37% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XLKAvsVGTA

    State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF · Vanguard Information Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IGMBvsRSPTB

    iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF · Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.37% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XLKAvsRSPTB

    State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF · Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.