Skip to content

IYW vs XLK

iShares U.S. Technology ETF

IYWBNYSE Arca

State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF

XLKANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

XLK −0.29pt a year

IYW0.37%XLK0.08%

Avg volume · 30D

XLK 13.6×the volume

IYW609KXLK8.28M

10Y return · a year

IYW +0.4pt

IYW+24.1%XLK+23.7%

IYW vs XLK Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+123.2%IYW+130.6%XLK

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. IYW +123.2%. XLK +130.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%50%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
IYW 0.37%
XLK 0.08%, better
Fund size
IYW $23.8B
XLK $125B
1Y total return
IYW +16.8%
XLK +20.0%, better
Yield (12M)
IYW 0.10%
XLK 0.47%, better
Holdings
IYW 150
XLK 78
Avg volume (30D)
IYW 609K sh
XLK 8.28M sh, better
NAV per share
IYW $242.61
XLK $188.72
52W range

ETF.net Grade

IYW: Cost 65, Risk 67, Mission 83, Tradability 89, Holdings 14, Durability 83. XLK: Cost 98, Risk 61, Mission 76, Tradability 98, Holdings 41, Durability 82.
Pillar letters and Scores for IYW, XLK, with each pillar’s weight
PillarIYWXLK
Cost30% weightB65A98Higher
Mission25% weightA83HigherA76
Risk15% weightB67HigherB61
Tradability15% weightA89A98Higher
Holdings10% weightF14C41Higher
Durability5% weightA83HigherA82

Rank among Technology (Broad) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. IYW and XLK are both graded against the same 23 Technology (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Technology (Broad)⁠

Category · 23 funds
See all 23 ›

XLK ranks 1st and IYW 5th of 23 funds in the Technology (Broad) Category.

  1. Rank 1AXLKState Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETFScore 82
  2. Rank 2AFTECFidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETFScore 78
  3. Rank 5BIGMiShares Expanded Tech Sector ETFScore 64
  4. Rank 5BIYWiShares U.S. Technology ETFScore 64
  5. Rank 5BXNTKState Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETFScore 64

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

IYWBiShares U.S. Technology ETF

XLKAState Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF

In short

IYW Most tech ETFs follow GICS and leave the big ad platforms out of the sector. IYW tracks a Russell index built on ICB rules, where there is no communication services bucket, so internet-ad giants count as tech. Listed in 2000, 0.37%, below the category median.

XLK A 1998 original: XLK owns the technology slice of the S&P 500, about 70 names, for eight basis points. Big, heavily traded, and top-heavy by design, with quarterly caps the only brake on the giants at the top.

Stated mandate

IYW Under ordinary conditions, the Fund commits a minimum of 80% of its assets to equity securities issued by U.S. technology or technology-enabled companies.

XLK The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Technology Select Sector Index before expenses.

Why people hold it

  • IYW Russell's sector runs on ICB rules with no communication services bucket, so ad-driven platforms like Alphabet and Meta count as tech here, unlike in GICS-built XLK, VGT or FTEC.ishares.comlseg.com
  • The benchmark is capped by design: 22.5% ceiling on any single issuer, 45% combined for all names above 4.5%, trimmed at each quarterly rebalance.ishares.com
  • Listed in 2000 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, so getting in and out is rarely the expensive part.
  • XLK Costs 0.08% a year against a roughly 0.40% median for broad tech funds, tying FTEC as the cheapest of the category's top-rated names and undercutting VGT's 0.09%.
  • One of the largest and most actively traded funds in the tech aisle, so entering or exiting rarely means fighting the order book.
  • Running since December 1998 and dead simple: the tech sector of the S&P 500, spanning software, semiconductors, hardware, communications equipment and IT services. Pays quarterly.ssga.com

Worth knowing

  • IYW At 0.37% it sits below the category median, but the index giants undercut it hard: XLK at 0.08%, FTEC at 0.084%, VGT at 0.09%.
  • Top-heavy by construction: about 150 holdings, with caps reset only quarterly, so a few mega caps can drift above their reset weight between rebalances.
  • Distributions come quarterly, but income is not the job here; the mandate is a US technology sector view.
  • XLK Top-heavy by construction. About 70 stocks, and the index only trims its biggest weights at quarterly rebalances to stay inside fund diversification limits.spglobal.com
  • The universe is S&P 500 tech only. Smaller tech companies outside the big index are out, and the Select Sector funds split the S&P 500 up, so some familiar names sit in other sector funds.ssga.com
  • It is one sector with no ballast from the rest of the market, so a tech drawdown lands here in full.

Full IYW profile⁠

Full XLK profile⁠

IYW vs XLK Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

IYW vs XLK Cost

Overpaying IYW vs XLK

$5,824

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • IYW 0.37%

    $7,513

  • XLK 0.08%

    $1,689

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • IYW 0.37%
  • XLK 0.08%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530IYW $7,513XLK $1,689

Year by year

YearIYWXLKOverpaying
10$670$147$523
20$2,590$575$2,015
30$7,513$1,689$5,824

Expense ratio

  • 0.37%IYW
  • 0.08%XLK, cheaper
  • Middle half of Technology (Broad) funds
  • Median 0.45%

XLK cheapest of 23 funds

IYW 7th cheapest of 23 funds

IYW vs XLK Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
IYW 0.10%
XLK 0.47%, better
Payout (12M)
IYW $0.25
XLK $0.83
Last payment
IYW $0.05
XLK $0.22
Ex-dividend
IYW Sep 15, 2026
XLK Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
IYW Sep 18, 2026
XLK Sep 23, 2026
Frequency
IYW Quarterly
XLK Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

IYWQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll IYW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.09; Jun 27, 2017 $0.08; Sep 26, 2017 $0.09; Dec 19, 2017 $0.08; Mar 22, 2018 $0.09; Jun 26, 2018 $0.10; Sep 26, 2018 $0.09; Dec 17, 2018 $0.09; Mar 20, 2019 $0.10; Jun 17, 2019 $0.11; Sep 24, 2019 $0.11; Dec 16, 2019 $0.09; Mar 25, 2020 $0.18; Jun 15, 2020 $0.11; Sep 23, 2020 $0.10; Dec 14, 2020 $0.08; Mar 25, 2021 $0.09; Jun 10, 2021 $0.08; Sep 24, 2021 $0.07; Dec 13, 2021 $0.12; Mar 24, 2022 $0.04; Jun 9, 2022 $0.08; Sep 26, 2022 $0.11; Dec 13, 2022 $0.15; Mar 23, 2023 $0.10; Jun 7, 2023 $0.07; Sep 26, 2023 $0.09; Dec 20, 2023 $0.23; Mar 21, 2024 $0.08; Jun 11, 2024 $0.08; Sep 25, 2024 $0.11; Dec 17, 2024 $0.07; Mar 18, 2025 $0.08; Jun 16, 2025 $0.09; Sep 16, 2025 $0.06; Dec 16, 2025 $0.06; Mar 17, 2026 $0.07; Jun 15, 2026 $0.07; Sep 15, 2026 $0.05. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD
XLKQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll XLK payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.10; Jun 16, 2017 $0.11; Sep 15, 2017 $0.10; Dec 15, 2017 $0.12; Mar 16, 2018 $0.11; Jun 15, 2018 $0.13; Sep 21, 2018 $0.13; Dec 21, 2018 $0.13; Mar 15, 2019 $0.12; Jun 21, 2019 $0.14; Sep 20, 2019 $0.13; Dec 20, 2019 $0.15; Mar 23, 2020 $0.19; Jun 22, 2020 $0.14; Sep 21, 2020 $0.12; Dec 21, 2020 $0.15; Mar 22, 2021 $0.14; Jun 21, 2021 $0.13; Sep 20, 2021 $0.14; Dec 20, 2021 $0.16; Mar 21, 2022 $0.14; Jun 21, 2022 $0.16; Sep 19, 2022 $0.16; Dec 19, 2022 $0.18; Mar 20, 2023 $0.16; Jun 20, 2023 $0.18; Sep 18, 2023 $0.18; Dec 18, 2023 $0.21; Mar 18, 2024 $0.17; Jun 24, 2024 $0.20; Sep 23, 2024 $0.20; Dec 23, 2024 $0.19; Mar 24, 2025 $0.19; Jun 23, 2025 $0.20; Sep 22, 2025 $0.18; Dec 22, 2025 $0.22; Mar 23, 2026 $0.17; Jun 22, 2026 $0.23; Sep 21, 2026 $0.22. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD

IYW vs XLK Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • IYW
  • XLK
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: IYW −39.4% · Nov 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−40%−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
IYW 22.8%, betterXLK 23.6%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
IYW 1.18, betterXLK 1.07
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
IYW −39.4%XLK −33.6%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
IYW 1.35XLK 1.35Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

Popular comparisons

  • IYWBvsFTECA

    iShares U.S. Technology ETF · Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.37% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XLKAvsFTECA

    State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF · Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IYWBvsVGTA

    iShares U.S. Technology ETF · Vanguard Information Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.37% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XLKAvsVGTA

    State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF · Vanguard Information Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IYWBvsRSPTB

    iShares U.S. Technology ETF · Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.37% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XLKAvsRSPTB

    State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF · Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.