XLK ranks 1st and IYW 5th of 23 funds in the Technology (Broad) Category.
IYW vs XLK
XLK −0.29pt a year
0.37%0.08%
XLK 13.6×the volume
609K8.28M
IYW +0.4pt
+24.1%+23.7%
IYW vs XLK Performance
+123.2%+130.6%
- IYW 0.37%
- XLK 0.08%, better
- IYW $23.8B
- XLK $125B
- IYW +16.8%
- XLK +20.0%, better
- IYW 0.10%
- XLK 0.47%, better
- IYW 150
- XLK 78
- IYW 609K sh
- XLK 8.28M sh, better
- IYW $242.61
- XLK $188.72
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IYW | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B65 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A83Higher | A76 |
| Risk | B67Higher | B61 |
| Tradability | A89 | A98Higher |
| Holdings | F14 | C41Higher |
| Durability | A83Higher | A82 |
Rank among Technology (Broad) funds
Same Category. IYW and XLK are both graded against the same 23 Technology (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IYWB
XLKA
In short
IYW Most tech ETFs follow GICS and leave the big ad platforms out of the sector. IYW tracks a Russell index built on ICB rules, where there is no communication services bucket, so internet-ad giants count as tech. Listed in 2000, 0.37%, below the category median.
XLK A 1998 original: XLK owns the technology slice of the S&P 500, about 70 names, for eight basis points. Big, heavily traded, and top-heavy by design, with quarterly caps the only brake on the giants at the top.
Stated mandate
IYW Under ordinary conditions, the Fund commits a minimum of 80% of its assets to equity securities issued by U.S. technology or technology-enabled companies.
XLK The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Technology Select Sector Index before expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IYW vs XLK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IYW vs XLK Cost
Overpaying IYW vs XLK
$5,824
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IYW 0.37%
$7,513
XLK 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IYW | XLK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $670 | $147 | $523 |
| 20 | $2,590 | $575 | $2,015 |
| 30 | $7,513 | $1,689 | $5,824 |
- 0.37%IYW
- 0.08%XLK, cheaper
- Middle half of Technology (Broad) funds
- Median 0.45%
XLK cheapest of 23 funds
IYW 7th cheapest of 23 funds
IYW vs XLK Dividends
- IYW 0.10%
- XLK 0.47%, better
- IYW $0.25
- XLK $0.83
- IYW $0.05
- XLK $0.22
- IYW Sep 15, 2026
- XLK Sep 21, 2026
- IYW Sep 18, 2026
- XLK Sep 23, 2026
- IYW Quarterly
- XLK Quarterly
Distribution history
IYW vs XLK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IYW
- XLK
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IYW 22.8%, betterXLK 23.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- IYW 1.18, betterXLK 1.07
- Worst fall
- IYW −39.4%XLK −33.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- IYW 1.35XLK 1.35Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Popular comparisons
- 0.37% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





