Skip to content
etf.net

ACGO vs FELG

Hartford Alpha Capture Growth ETF

ACGOBCboe

Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

FELGANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

FELG −0.24pt a year

ACGO0.42%FELG0.18%

Avg volume · 30D

FELG 885.5×the volume

ACGO428FELG379K

ACGO vs FELG Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−0.4%ACGO−0.6%FELG

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. ACGO −0.4%. FELG −0.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.2%4%6%8%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ACGO 0.42%
FELG 0.18%, better
Fund size
ACGO $103M
FELG $5.78B
1Y total return
ACGO No data
FELG −0.5%
Yield (12M)
ACGO No data
FELG 0.37%
Holdings
ACGO 69
FELG 133
Avg volume (30D)
ACGO 428 sh
FELG 379K sh, better
NAV per share
ACGO $36.53
FELG $42.20
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ACGO: Cost 77, Risk 47, Mission not scored, Tradability 42, Holdings 44, Durability 35. FELG: Cost 99, Risk 51, Mission 82, Tradability 85, Holdings 52, Durability 95.
Pillar letters and Scores for ACGO, FELG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarACGOFELG
Cost30% weightA77A99Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA82
Risk15% weightC47C51Higher
Tradability15% weightC42A85Higher
Holdings10% weightC44C52Higher
Durability5% weightD35A95Higher

Rank among US Active Growth funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ACGO and FELG are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

FELG ranks 4th and ACGO 32nd of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 4AFELGFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETFScore 80
  5. Rank 5AGQQQAstoria US Quality Growth Kings ETFScore 77
  6. Rank 30BMFIGMotley Fool Innovative Growth ETFScore 57
  7. Rank 32BACGOHartford Alpha Capture Growth ETFScore 56
  8. Rank 32BFBCGFidelity Blue Chip Growth ETFScore 56

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ACGOBHartford Alpha Capture Growth ETF

FELGAFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

In short

ACGO No data

FELG Active stock-picking on an index-fund budget. FELG charges 0.18% to tilt around the Russell 1000 Growth Index rather than copy it, running a strategy whose track record dates to 2007.

Stated mandate

ACGO No data

FELG The fund seeks capital appreciation and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in common stocks included in the Russell 1000® Growth Index.

Why people hold it

ACGO No data

  • FELG 0.18% a year, roughly a third of the typical fee among active US growth-conviction funds.
  • Not a moonshot: at least 80% of assets sit in Russell 1000 Growth constituents across about 110 stocks, so the manager's bets are tilts around a familiar benchmark.fidelity.com
  • One of the strongest implementations in its peer group, and cheaper than most of the other top-graded names there (GUSE and MAGS at 0.30%, LRGC at 0.39%).
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund from Fidelity with steady on-screen liquidity, and it pays quarterly.

Worth knowing

ACGO No data

  • FELG Concentrated by design: roughly 110 large-cap growth names, so the megacap tech leaders at the top of the Russell 1000 Growth Index drive the ride both ways.
  • Active means the portfolio deviates from the index on purpose, so results can land on either side of it.
  • Not the cheapest seat in the cohort: JUSA runs 0.12%, though its mandate is broad large-cap rather than the growth slice.

Full ACGO profile⁠

Full FELG profile⁠

ACGO vs FELG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ACGO vs FELG Cost

Overpaying ACGO vs FELG

$4,723

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ACGO 0.42%

    $8,472

  • FELG 0.18%

    $3,749

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ACGO 0.42%
  • FELG 0.18%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530ACGO $8,472FELG $3,749

Year by year

YearACGOFELGOverpaying
10$759$328$431
20$2,927$1,281$1,646
30$8,472$3,749$4,723

Expense ratio

  • 0.42%ACGO
  • 0.18%FELG, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

FELG cheapest of 90 funds

ACGO 22nd cheapest of 90 funds

ACGO vs FELG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ACGO No data
FELG 0.37%
Payout (12M)
ACGO None
FELG $0.16
Last payment
ACGO No data
FELG $0.04
Ex-dividend
ACGO No data
FELG Sep 18, 2026
Paid on
ACGO No data
FELG Sep 22, 2026
Frequency
ACGO No data
FELG Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

ACGOAll ACGO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

FELGQuarterly · 14 paymentsAll FELG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 14 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Oct 13, 2023 $0.14; Nov 14, 2023 $0.04; Dec 28, 2023 $0.03; Mar 15, 2024 $0.03; Jun 21, 2024 $0.05; Sep 20, 2024 $0.04; Dec 20, 2024 $0.05; Mar 21, 2025 $0.04; Jun 20, 2025 $0.04; Sep 19, 2025 $0.04; Dec 19, 2025 $0.04; Mar 20, 2026 $0.03; Jun 18, 2026 $0.05; Sep 18, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.1020232026YTD

ACGO vs FELG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ACGO No dataFELG 16.3%since Dec 2023
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ACGO No dataFELG 0.93since Dec 2023
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ACGO No dataFELG −23.9%since Nov 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ACGO 1.72FELG 1.23

ACGO and FELG in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • ACGOBvsJUSAA

    Hartford Alpha Capture Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.42% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • FELGAvsJUSAA

    Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ACGOBvsGUSEA

    Hartford Alpha Capture Growth ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.42% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • FELGAvsGUSEA

    Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ACGOBvsLRGCA

    Hartford Alpha Capture Growth ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.42% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • FELGAvsLRGCA

    Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.