Skip to content
etf.net

ACGO vs LRGC

Hartford Alpha Capture Growth ETF

ACGOBCboe

AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

LRGCANYSE Arca

Overlap

38.1%by weight

Expense ratio

LRGC −0.03pt a year

ACGO0.42%LRGC0.39%

Avg volume · 30D

LRGC 79.6×the volume

ACGO428LRGC34.1K

ACGO vs LRGC Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−0.4%ACGO−0.1%LRGC

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. ACGO −0.4%. LRGC −0.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.2%4%6%8%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ACGO 0.42%
LRGC 0.39%, better
Fund size
ACGO $103M
LRGC $1.37B
1Y total return
ACGO No data
LRGC +9.5%
Yield (12M)
ACGO No data
LRGC 0.53%
Holdings
ACGO 69
LRGC 72
Avg volume (30D)
ACGO 428 sh
LRGC 34.1K sh, better
NAV per share
ACGO $36.53
LRGC $85.00
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ACGO: Cost 77, Risk 47, Mission not scored, Tradability 42, Holdings 44, Durability 35. LRGC: Cost 82, Risk 90, Mission 79, Tradability 75, Holdings 77, Durability 78.
Pillar letters and Scores for ACGO, LRGC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarACGOLRGC
Cost30% weightA77A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA79
Risk15% weightC47A90Higher
Tradability15% weightC42A75Higher
Holdings10% weightC44A77Higher
Durability5% weightD35A78Higher

Rank among US Active Growth funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ACGO and LRGC are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

LRGC ranks 3rd and ACGO 32nd of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 4AFELGFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETFScore 80
  5. Rank 30BMFIGMotley Fool Innovative Growth ETFScore 57
  6. Rank 32BACGOHartford Alpha Capture Growth ETFScore 56
  7. Rank 32BFBCGFidelity Blue Chip Growth ETFScore 56

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ACGOBHartford Alpha Capture Growth ETF

LRGCAAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

In short

ACGO No data

LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.

Stated mandate

ACGO No data

LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.

Why people hold it

ACGO No data

  • LRGC Roughly 70 holdings against a 500-stock yardstick, with quality and value screens doing the filtering. Each name actually carries weight.
  • 0.39% a year sits below the median fee in its active large-cap group, so the manager isn't digging out of a deep cost hole.
  • One of the stronger implementations among the actively managed US large-cap funds we track, with a plain mandate: at least 80% of net assets in large-cap US equities.
  • Launched in 2023 on one of AB's core US equity strategies, with Jane Street signed on as lead market maker from day one.prnewswire.com

Worth knowing

ACGO No data

  • LRGC At 0.39%, it costs more than cheaper enhanced-index rivals in the same group, such as JUSA at 0.12% and GUSE at 0.30%.
  • Outcomes ride on the team's judgment, not an index rulebook, and about 70 positions concentrate those calls.
  • It trades lightly next to the big index names, so spreads can run wider, especially in fast markets.

Full ACGO profile⁠

Full LRGC profile⁠

ACGO vs LRGC Holdings

How ACGO and LRGC differ

Overlap by weight

38.1%

Shared holdings make up 60.7% of ACGO and 44.6% of LRGC.

Level by level

  • Holdings14 in both38.1%
  • Sector11 Sectors74.6%
  • Countryby domicile96.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in ACGO and LRGC, widest gap first
SectorMore in ACGOMore in LRGC
TechnologyACGO +18.5 points
FinancialsLRGC +8.6 points
CommunicationACGO +6.7 points
IndustrialsLRGC +6.6 points
Health CareLRGC +3.6 points
EnergyLRGC +2.1 points
UtilitiesLRGC +1.7 points
Consumer StaplesLRGC +1.1 points
Real EstateLRGC +1.1 points
MaterialsLRGC +0.7 points
Consumer DiscretionaryACGO +0.2 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in ACGO and LRGC, widest gap first
CountryMore in ACGOMore in LRGC
United StatesACGO +3.3 points
TaiwanLRGC +1.2 points
NetherlandsLRGC +1.2 points
United KingdomLRGC +0.8 points
MexicoACGO +0.7 points
CanadaLRGC +0.7 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • ACGO60.6%
  • LRGC42.5%

Securities held

  • ACGO68
  • LRGC71

Asset class

ACGO
Equity
LRGC
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in ACGO54
  • In both14
  • Only in LRGC57

Only in ACGO

54 securities, 39.2% of ACGO by weight

  • Mastercard Inc A Common Stock USD.00013.30%
  • Tesla Inc Common Stock USD.0012.84%
  • Advanced Micro Devices Common Stock USD.012.74%

Only in LRGC

57 securities, 55.3% of LRGC by weight

  • Exxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock1.79%
  • Rtx Corp Common Stock USD1.01.69%
  • Eog Resources Inc Common Stock USD.011.67%

Weight gaps

All 14 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in ACGO and LRGC, widest gap first
HoldingMore in ACGOMore in LRGC
NVIDIA Corp Common Stock USD.001NVDAACGO +6.84 points
Alphabet Inc Class C Common Stock USD.001GOOGACGO +4.23 points
Eli Lilly & Co Common StockLLYACGO +3.33 points
Apple Inc Common Stock USD.00001AAPLACGO +2.66 points
Amazon.com Inc Common Stock USD.01AMZNLRGC +2.57 points
Micron Technology Inc Common Stock USD.1MUACGO +2.53 points
Broadcom Inc Common StockAVGOACGO +2.08 points
Visa Inc Class A Shares Common Stock USD.0001VLRGC +1.68 points

All ACGO holdings⁠All 70 LRGC holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ACGO vs LRGC Cost

Overpaying ACGO vs LRGC

$574

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ACGO 0.42%

    $8,472

  • LRGC 0.39%

    $7,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ACGO 0.42%
  • LRGC 0.39%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530ACGO $8,472LRGC $7,898

Year by year

YearACGOLRGCOverpaying
10$759$705$54
20$2,927$2,725$202
30$8,472$7,898$574

Expense ratio

  • 0.42%ACGO
  • 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds

ACGO 22nd cheapest of 90 funds

ACGO vs LRGC Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ACGO No data
LRGC 0.53%
Payout (12M)
ACGO None
LRGC $0.45
Last payment
ACGO No data
LRGC $0.45
Ex-dividend
ACGO No data
LRGC Dec 17, 2025
Paid on
ACGO No data
LRGC Dec 18, 2025
Frequency
ACGO No data
LRGC Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

ACGOAll ACGO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

LRGCAnnual · 3 paymentsAll LRGC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 8, 2023 $0.09; Dec 17, 2024 $0.31; Dec 17, 2025 $0.45. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

ACGO vs LRGC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ACGO No dataLRGC 12.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ACGO No dataLRGC 1.26
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ACGO No dataLRGC −19.4%since Sep 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ACGO 1.72LRGC 1.00

ACGO and LRGC in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • ACGOBvsJUSAA

    Hartford Alpha Capture Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.42% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LRGCAvsJUSAA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ACGOBvsGUSEA

    Hartford Alpha Capture Growth ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.42% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LRGCAvsGUSEA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ACGOBvsFELGA

    Hartford Alpha Capture Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.42% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LRGCAvsFELGA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.