AMZD ranks 4th and CONI 23rd of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AMZD vs CONI
0.0%by weight
AMZD −0.69pt a year
1.02%1.71%
AMZD 46.4×the volume
12.2M263K
AMZD vs CONI Performance
−5.6%+11.2%
- AMZD 1.02%, better
- CONI 1.71%
- AMZD $18M
- CONI $10M
- AMZD −5.6%
- CONI +11.2%, better
- AMZD 2.71%, better
- CONI 1.51%
- AMZD 3
- CONI 1
- AMZD 12.2M sh, better
- CONI 263K sh
- AMZD $9.03
- CONI $36.53
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AMZD | CONI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78Higher | F7 |
| Mission | A96Higher | A95 |
| Risk | A72Higher | B56 |
| Tradability | A74Higher | B55 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A70Higher | B57 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AMZD and CONI are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AMZDA
CONIC
In short
AMZD Most single-stock bear funds reach for leverage. AMZD skips it: one dollar down for every dollar Amazon rises, for a single trading day, through swaps you buy like any share. 1.02% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
CONI The heavier short on Coinbase. CONI aims for -2 times COIN's move each day, where most single-stock bear funds stop at -1x. Cost is 1.15% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026, and the exposure resets daily.
Stated mandate
AMZD The fund seeks daily inverse investment results tied to AMZN and is materially different from ordinary exchange-traded funds.
CONI The Fund seeks daily inverse results equal to -2 times the daily percentage change of Coinbase Global Inc.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AMZD vs CONI Holdings
How AMZD and CONI differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of AMZD and 0.0% of CONI.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for AMZD.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for AMZD.
Concentration
- AMZD1816.7%
- CONI199.9%
- AMZD1
- CONI1
Asset class
- AMZD
- Leveraged/Inverse
- CONI
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in AMZD1
- In both0
- Only in CONI1
Only in AMZD
1 security, 100% of AMZD by weight
- Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 506597.32%
Only in CONI
1 security, 100% of CONI by weight
- Coin199.92%
Weight gaps
AMZD and CONI share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AMZD vs CONI Cost
Overpaying CONI vs AMZD
$10,163
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AMZD 1.02%
$19,012
CONI 1.71%
$29,175
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AMZD | CONI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,797 | $2,927 | $1,130 |
| 20 | $6,746 | $10,659 | $3,913 |
| 30 | $19,012 | $29,175 | $10,163 |
- 1.02%AMZD, cheaper
- 1.71%CONI
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
AMZD 12th cheapest of 43 funds
CONI 39th cheapest of 43 funds
AMZD vs CONI Dividends
- AMZD 2.71%, better
- CONI 1.51%
- AMZD $0.24
- CONI $0.60
- AMZD $0.05
- CONI $0.60
- AMZD Sep 22, 2026
- CONI Dec 29, 2025
- AMZD Sep 29, 2026
- CONI Dec 31, 2025
- AMZD Quarterly
- CONI Annual
Distribution history
AMZD vs CONI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AMZD 27.4%CONI 112.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- AMZD −0.86CONI −0.46
- Worst fall
- AMZD −74.7%CONI −96.2%
- Market sensitivity
- AMZD −1.26CONI −4.23
Popular comparisons
- 1.02% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.71% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.71% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.71% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.