AOK ranks 1st and MFUL 6th of 7 funds in the Conservative Allocation Category.
AOK vs MFUL
AOK −1.33pt a year
0.15%1.48%
AOK 270.4×the volume
194K719
AOK +5.4pt
+10.5%+5.1%
AOK vs MFUL Performance
+3.8%+0.6%
- AOK 0.15%, better
- MFUL 1.48%
- AOK $852M
- MFUL $7M
- AOK +3.8%, better
- MFUL +0.6%
- AOK 3.50%, better
- MFUL 1.87%
- AOK 34238
- MFUL 18
- AOK 194K sh, better
- MFUL 719 sh
- AOK $40.58
- MFUL $22.05
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AOK | MFUL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | F19 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A76 |
| Risk | B57Higher | C44 |
| Tradability | A86Higher | D34 |
| Holdings | A76Higher | C51 |
| Durability | A88Higher | C44 |
Rank among Conservative Allocation funds
Same Category. AOK and MFUL are both graded against the same 7 Conservative Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AOKA
MFULC
In short
AOK One ticker, one conservative portfolio. Since 2008 AOK has tracked S&P's target-risk index built to hold 30% stocks and 70% bonds, using a handful of iShares funds underneath, and it pays monthly.
MFUL Most conservative allocation funds ride out the storm. MFUL's signals can shift up to the entire portfolio into cash or money-market ETFs instead. A 2021-vintage, tactical fund-of-ETFs at 1.48%, no waiver.
Stated mandate
AOK The fund seeks diversified exposure through equity and fixed-income ETFs to represent a conservative target-risk allocation, with greater emphasis on income and capital preservation.
MFUL The Fund seeks current income and is positioned for conservative investors who can tolerate only limited pricing volatility.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AOK vs MFUL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AOK vs MFUL Cost
Overpaying MFUL vs AOK
$22,862
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AOK 0.15%
$3,137
MFUL 1.48%
$25,999
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AOK | MFUL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $2,558 | $2,284 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $9,408 | $8,337 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $25,999 | $22,862 |
- 0.15%AOK, cheaper
- 1.48%MFUL
- Middle half of Conservative Allocation funds
- Median 0.67%
AOK cheapest of 7 funds
MFUL 6th cheapest of 7 funds
AOK vs MFUL Dividends
- AOK 3.50%, better
- MFUL 1.87%
- AOK $1.42
- MFUL $0.41
- AOK $0.13
- MFUL $0.41
- AOK Oct 2, 2026
- MFUL Dec 16, 2025
- AOK Oct 7, 2026
- MFUL Dec 17, 2025
- AOK Monthly
- MFUL Quarterly
Distribution history
AOK vs MFUL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AOK 6.2%MFUL 4.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- AOK 0.93, betterMFUL 0.14
- Worst fall
- AOK −18.9%MFUL −16.4%
- Market sensitivity
- AOK 0.69MFUL 0.47
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.48% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.67%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.48% · 0.67%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 1.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.48% · 1.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.