BLUI ranks 3rd and MFUL 6th of 7 funds in the Conservative Allocation Category.
BLUI vs MFUL
BLUI −0.81pt a year
0.67%1.48%
BLUI 21.8×the volume
15.7K719
BLUI vs MFUL Performance
+4.1%+0.4%
- BLUI 0.67%, better
- MFUL 1.48%
- BLUI $121M
- MFUL $7M
- BLUI +4.1%, better
- MFUL +0.4%
- BLUI 5.24%, better
- MFUL 1.88%
- BLUI 8
- MFUL 18
- BLUI 15.7K sh, better
- MFUL 719 sh
- BLUI $25.14
- MFUL $21.91
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BLUI | MFUL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C46Higher | F19 |
| Mission | C50 | A76Higher |
| Risk | B63Higher | C44 |
| Tradability | A70Higher | D34 |
| Holdings | D27 | C51Higher |
| Durability | B60Higher | C44 |
Rank among Conservative Allocation funds
Same Category. BLUI and MFUL are both graded against the same 7 Conservative Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BLUIC
MFULC
In short
BLUI One ticker, one job: Bluemonte's team picks other income ETFs (junk bonds, bank loans, mortgages, REITs, preferreds) and decides the mix. Actively managed since its 2025 launch, with income paid out monthly.
MFUL Most conservative allocation funds ride out the storm. MFUL's signals can shift up to the entire portfolio into cash or money-market ETFs instead. A 2021-vintage, tactical fund-of-ETFs at 1.48%, no waiver.
Stated mandate
BLUI The Fund seeks total return and income and is actively managed. Under normal circumstances, it invests at least 80% of its assets in income-generating investments.
MFUL The Fund seeks current income and is positioned for conservative investors who can tolerate only limited pricing volatility.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BLUI vs MFUL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BLUI vs MFUL Cost
Overpaying MFUL vs BLUI
$12,925
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BLUI 0.67%
$13,074
MFUL 1.48%
$25,999
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BLUI | MFUL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,198 | $2,558 | $1,360 |
| 20 | $4,568 | $9,408 | $4,840 |
| 30 | $13,074 | $25,999 | $12,925 |
- 0.67%BLUI, cheaper
- 1.48%MFUL
- Middle half of Conservative Allocation funds
- Median 0.67%
BLUI 4th cheapest of 7 funds
MFUL 6th cheapest of 7 funds
BLUI vs MFUL Dividends
- BLUI 5.24%, better
- MFUL 1.88%
- BLUI $1.31
- MFUL $0.41
- BLUI $0.10
- MFUL $0.41
- BLUI Oct 28, 2026
- MFUL Dec 16, 2025
- BLUI Oct 30, 2026
- MFUL Dec 17, 2025
- BLUI Monthly
- MFUL Quarterly
Distribution history
BLUI vs MFUL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BLUI 4.5%MFUL 4.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- BLUI 0.25MFUL 0.14
- Worst fall
- BLUI −3.7%MFUL −16.4%
- Market sensitivity
- BLUI 0.07MFUL 0.47
Popular comparisons
- 0.67% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.48% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.67% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.48% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.67% · 1.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.48% · 1.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.