AOK ranks 1st and CGMS 2nd of 7 funds in the Conservative Allocation Category.
AOK vs CGMS
AOK −0.24pt a year
0.15%0.39%
CGMS 6.2×the volume
194K1.2M
AOK +2.5pt
+10.5%+8.0%
AOK vs CGMS Performance
+3.8%+1.6%
- AOK 0.15%, better
- CGMS 0.39%
- AOK $852M
- CGMS $5.61B
- AOK +3.8%, better
- CGMS +1.6%
- AOK 3.50%
- CGMS 6.69%, better
- AOK 34238
- CGMS 1548
- AOK 194K sh
- CGMS 1.2M sh, better
- AOK $40.58
- CGMS $26.40
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AOK | CGMS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | A75 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A82 |
| Risk | B57 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | A86Higher | A74 |
| Holdings | A76 | A84Higher |
| Durability | A88Higher | A72 |
Rank among Conservative Allocation funds
Same Category. AOK and CGMS are both graded against the same 7 Conservative Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AOKA
CGMSA
In short
AOK One ticker, one conservative portfolio. Since 2008 AOK has tracked S&P's target-risk index built to hold 30% stocks and 70% bonds, using a handful of iShares funds underneath, and it pays monthly.
CGMS Capital Group's bond desk in ETF form: one ticket across the income-producing corners of the US market, roughly 1,200 positions deep, paying monthly. Income first, capital appreciation second.
Stated mandate
AOK The fund seeks diversified exposure through equity and fixed-income ETFs to represent a conservative target-risk allocation, with greater emphasis on income and capital preservation.
CGMS The fund seeks a high level of current income, with capital appreciation as a secondary objective.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AOK vs CGMS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AOK vs CGMS Cost
Overpaying CGMS vs AOK
$4,761
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AOK 0.15%
$3,137
CGMS 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AOK | CGMS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $705 | $431 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $2,725 | $1,654 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $7,898 | $4,761 |
- 0.15%AOK, cheaper
- 0.39%CGMS
- Middle half of Conservative Allocation funds
- Median 0.67%
AOK cheapest of 7 funds
CGMS 2nd cheapest of 7 funds
AOK vs CGMS Dividends
- AOK 3.50%
- CGMS 6.69%, better
- AOK $1.42
- CGMS $1.77
- AOK $0.13
- CGMS $0.12
- AOK Oct 2, 2026
- CGMS Oct 30, 2026
- AOK Oct 7, 2026
- CGMS Pays Nov 2, 2026
- AOK Monthly
- CGMS Monthly
Distribution history
AOK vs CGMS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AOK 6.2%CGMS 4.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- AOK 0.93, betterCGMS 0.71
- Worst fall
- AOK −18.9%CGMS −4.1%
- Market sensitivity
- AOK 0.69CGMS 0.72
AOK and CGMS in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.67%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.67%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 1.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 1.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 1.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 1.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

