AOK ranks 1st and XRLX 4th of 7 funds in the Conservative Allocation Category.
AOK vs XRLX
AOK −1.05pt a year
0.15%1.20%
AOK 118.7×the volume
194K1.64K
XRLX +2.7pt
+10.5%+13.2%
AOK vs XRLX Performance
+3.8%+4.7%
- AOK 0.15%, better
- XRLX 1.20%
- AOK $852M
- XRLX $45M
- AOK +3.8%
- XRLX +4.7%, better
- AOK 3.50%, better
- XRLX 2.66%
- AOK 34238
- XRLX 20
- AOK 194K sh, better
- XRLX 1.64K sh
- AOK $40.58
- XRLX $47.90
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AOK | XRLX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | D30 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A81 |
| Risk | B57Higher | D35 |
| Tradability | A86Higher | C54 |
| Holdings | A76Higher | B63 |
| Durability | A88Higher | B61 |
Rank among Conservative Allocation funds
Same Category. AOK and XRLX are both graded against the same 7 Conservative Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AOKA
XRLXC
In short
AOK One ticker, one conservative portfolio. Since 2008 AOK has tracked S&P's target-risk index built to hold 30% stocks and 70% bonds, using a handful of iShares funds underneath, and it pays monthly.
XRLX Most conservative allocation funds are index blends on autopilot. XRLX is actively managed: a fund of funds that ranks other funds on recent returns, buys the leaders and sells them when they fade.
Stated mandate
AOK The fund seeks diversified exposure through equity and fixed-income ETFs to represent a conservative target-risk allocation, with greater emphasis on income and capital preservation.
XRLX The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation and may provide a low level of current income intended to reduce portfolio volatility.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AOK vs XRLX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AOK vs XRLX Cost
Overpaying XRLX vs AOK
$18,714
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AOK 0.15%
$3,137
XRLX 1.20%
$21,851
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AOK | XRLX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $2,098 | $1,824 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $7,814 | $6,743 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $21,851 | $18,714 |
- 0.15%AOK, cheaper
- 1.20%XRLX
- Middle half of Conservative Allocation funds
- Median 0.67%
AOK cheapest of 7 funds
XRLX 5th cheapest of 7 funds
AOK vs XRLX Dividends
- AOK 3.50%, better
- XRLX 2.66%
- AOK $1.42
- XRLX $1.28
- AOK $0.13
- XRLX $1.28
- AOK Oct 2, 2026
- XRLX Dec 31, 2025
- AOK Oct 7, 2026
- XRLX Jan 2, 2026
- AOK Monthly
- XRLX Annual
Distribution history
AOK vs XRLX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AOK 6.2%, betterXRLX 9.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- AOK 0.93XRLX 0.94, better
- Worst fall
- AOK −18.9%XRLX −15.4%
- Market sensitivity
- AOK 0.69XRLX 0.83
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.20% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.67%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.20% · 0.67%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 1.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.20% · 1.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.