Skip to content
etf.net

AOTG vs GUSE

AOT Growth and Innovation ETF

AOTGDNasdaq

Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

GUSEANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

GUSE −0.45pt a year

AOTG0.75%GUSE0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

GUSE 7.0×the volume

AOTG3.55KGUSE24.9K

AOTG vs GUSE Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+5.9%AOTG+11.8%GUSE

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. AOTG +5.9%. GUSE +11.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%0%20%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
AOTG 0.75%
GUSE 0.30%, better
Fund size
AOTG $98M
GUSE $421M
1Y total return
AOTG +0.7%
GUSE No data
Holdings
AOTG 44
GUSE 122
Avg volume (30D)
AOTG 3.55K sh
GUSE 24.9K sh, better
NAV per share
AOTG $59.24
GUSE $46.05
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AOTG: Cost 19, Risk 23, Mission not scored, Tradability 29, Holdings 29, Durability 52. GUSE: Cost 97, Risk 94, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 89, Durability 85.
Pillar letters and Scores for AOTG, GUSE, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAOTGGUSE
Cost30% weightF19A97Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightF23A94Higher
Tradability15% weightD29C46Higher
Holdings10% weightD29A89Higher
Durability5% weightC52A85Higher

Rank among US Active Growth funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AOTG and GUSE are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

GUSE ranks 2nd and AOTG 83rd of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 82DAKREAkre Focus ETFScore 26
  5. Rank 83DAOTGAOT Growth and Innovation ETFScore 25
  6. Rank 83DTMFMMotley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETFScore 25

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AOTGDAOT Growth and Innovation ETF

GUSEAGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

In short

AOTG Most growth funds buy "tech." AOTG buys an economic trait: businesses that can sell the next unit for almost nothing. A concentrated, actively run book built on low marginal cost, growth and quality screens.

GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.

Stated mandate

AOTG The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through active investment in U.S.-listed equities with high growth potential, emphasizing companies whose low marginal-cost business models can support expanding profits and growth.

GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.

Why people hold it

  • AOTG The filter is an economics test, not a sector label: companies that can deliver more goods or services without materially raising their costs.sec.gov
  • Genuinely active, not a closet index. A boutique specialist recommends the names and the adviser places the trades, inside a plain 1940 Act ETF wrapper.sec.gov
  • A focused book rather than a sprawling index, so the manager's best ideas actually move the needle.
  • GUSE Charges 0.30% a year, against a 0.54% median for its active US growth cohort. Cheap, for stock picking.
  • Actively run with no index to shadow. Managers hold companies they judge positioned for long-term growth, so the portfolio can look different from a large-cap benchmark.
  • Inception dates to 2008, so the strategy has run through multiple market cycles, not one long rally.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded field of active US growth funds.

Worth knowing

  • AOTG Fees run 0.75% a year against a 0.54% peer median, and several top-ranked rivals in the group (JUSA at 0.12%, FELG at 0.18%) cost a fraction of that.
  • Small and thinly traded next to the giants of its category, so spreads can be wider. Limit orders matter more here than on a megafund.
  • A capital-appreciation mandate with no payouts in the last year, and concentration cuts both ways: a few names drive the outcome.
  • GUSE Trades thinly next to the category's heavyweights. Spreads can be wider, which bites most on large or hurried orders.
  • Two peers in the same top tier undercut it on fee: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18%. Price is not where this one stands out.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly. Growth of capital is the stated goal, not an income stream.

Full AOTG profile⁠

Full GUSE profile⁠

AOTG vs GUSE Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AOTG vs GUSE Cost

Overpaying AOTG vs GUSE

$8,333

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AOTG 0.75%

    $14,482

  • GUSE 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AOTG 0.75%
  • GUSE 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530AOTG $14,482GUSE $6,149

Year by year

YearAOTGGUSEOverpaying
10$1,336$545$791
20$5,078$2,113$2,965
30$14,482$6,149$8,333

Expense ratio

  • 0.75%AOTG
  • 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds

AOTG 72nd cheapest of 90 funds

AOTG vs GUSE Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
AOTG None
GUSE No data
Last payment
AOTG No data
GUSE $0.30
Ex-dividend
AOTG No data
GUSE Dec 23, 2025
Paid on
AOTG No data
GUSE Dec 30, 2025
Frequency
AOTG No data
GUSE Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

AOTGAll AOTG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

GUSEIrregular · 1 paymentAll GUSE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

AOTG vs GUSE Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AOTG 25.0%GUSE No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AOTG 0.96GUSE No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AOTG −31.6%since Jun 2022GUSE No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AOTG 1.45GUSE 0.93

Popular comparisons

  • AOTGDvsJUSAA

    AOT Growth and Innovation ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GUSEAvsJUSAA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • AOTGDvsLRGCA

    AOT Growth and Innovation ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GUSEAvsLRGCA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • AOTGDvsFELGA

    AOT Growth and Innovation ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GUSEAvsFELGA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.