JUSA ranks 1st and AOTG 83rd of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
AOTG vs JUSA
JUSA −0.57pt a year
0.75%0.18%
JUSA 27.8×the volume
3.55K98.8K
AOTG vs JUSA Performance
+0.7%+10.8%
- AOTG 0.75%
- JUSA 0.18%, better
- AOTG $98M
- JUSA $745M
- AOTG +0.7%
- JUSA +10.8%, better
- AOTG
- JUSA 0.72%
- AOTG 44
- JUSA 263
- AOTG 3.55K sh
- JUSA 98.8K sh, better
- AOTG $59.24
- JUSA $67.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AOTG | JUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F19 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A84 | |
| Risk | F23 | A92Higher |
| Tradability | D29 | B58Higher |
| Holdings | D29 | A84Higher |
| Durability | C52 | A76Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. AOTG and JUSA are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AOTGD
JUSAA
In short
AOTG Most growth funds buy "tech." AOTG buys an economic trait: businesses that can sell the next unit for almost nothing. A concentrated, actively run book built on low marginal cost, growth and quality screens.
JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
AOTG The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through active investment in U.S.-listed equities with high growth potential, emphasizing companies whose low marginal-cost business models can support expanding profits and growth.
JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AOTG vs JUSA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AOTG vs JUSA Cost
Overpaying AOTG vs JUSA
$10,733
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AOTG 0.75%
$14,482
JUSA 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AOTG | JUSA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $328 | $1,008 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $1,281 | $3,797 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $3,749 | $10,733 |
- 0.75%AOTG
- 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
JUSA cheapest of 90 funds
AOTG 72nd cheapest of 90 funds
AOTG vs JUSA Dividends
- AOTG
- JUSA 0.72%
- AOTG None
- JUSA $0.49
- AOTG
- JUSA $0.13
- AOTG
- JUSA Sep 22, 2026
- AOTG
- JUSA Sep 24, 2026
- AOTG
- JUSA Quarterly
Distribution history
AOTG vs JUSA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AOTG 25.0%JUSA 11.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- AOTG 0.96JUSA 1.41
- Worst fall
- AOTG −31.6%JUSA −14.0%
- Market sensitivity
- AOTG 1.45JUSA 0.98
AOTG and JUSA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

