Skip to content

APRW vs PSFJ

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Apr ETF

APRWCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

PSFJBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

PSFJ −0.25pt a year

APRW0.74%PSFJ0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

APRW 1.3×the volume

APRW13.6KPSFJ10.6K

5Y return · a year

PSFJ +3.7pt

APRW+7.1%PSFJ+10.8%

APRW vs PSFJ Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

+40.9%APRW+66.7%PSFJ

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. APRW +40.9%. PSFJ +66.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%20%Nov 2021Apr 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
APRW 0.74%
PSFJ 0.49%, better
Fund size
APRW $203M
PSFJ $57M
1Y total return
APRW +10.2%, better
PSFJ +9.1%
Yield (12M)
APRW 0.00%
PSFJ No data
Holdings
APRW 2
PSFJ 4
Avg volume (30D)
APRW 13.6K sh, better
PSFJ 10.6K sh
NAV per share
APRW $37.95
PSFJ $35.85
52W range

ETF.net Grade

APRW: Cost 37, Risk 64, Mission not scored, Tradability 70, Holdings 48, Durability 68. PSFJ: Cost 85, Risk 30, Mission not scored, Tradability 51, Holdings not scored, Durability 57.
Pillar letters and Scores for APRW, PSFJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAPRWPSFJ
Cost30% weightD37A85Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB64HigherD30
Tradability15% weightA70HigherC51
Holdings10% weightC48Not scored
Durability5% weightB68HigherB57

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. APRW and PSFJ are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 20%⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

PSFJ ranks 2nd and APRW 10th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFScore 65
  2. Rank 2BPSFJPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETFScore 62
  3. Rank 3BPSFDPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 9CJANWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jan ETFScore 53
  5. Rank 10CAPRWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Apr ETFScore 52
  6. Rank 10CSEPWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Sep ETFScore 52

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

APRWCAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Apr ETF

PSFJBPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

In short

APRW The April door in AllianzIM's buffer lineup: one year of the big S&P 500 tracker ETF's price move, cushioned against the first 20% of losses and capped on the upside, with the clock resetting every April 1.

PSFJ A 20% cushion against the S&P 500's first losses, paid for with a ceiling on the upside, reset every July 1. Pacer runs the trade for less than most of the deep-buffer crowd charges.

Stated mandate

APRW The Fund seeks to match the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust’s share-price return over the current one-year Outcome Period, subject to an upside Cap, while buffering the first 20% of losses.

PSFJ The Fund seeks to match, before fees and expenses, the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while buffering the first 20% of downside losses over an approximate one-year period.

Why people hold it

  • APRW Absorbs the first 20% of the reference S&P 500 ETF's share-price decline over each one-year outcome period, running April 1 to March 31, then resetting.
  • Actively managed, but the contract is mechanical: a stated 20% buffer against one well-known reference ETF, not a manager's stock picks.
  • One month in AllianzIM's rolling series (MAYW runs the May cycle), so start dates can be laddered instead of pinned to a single entry point.
  • Running since 2020, and it lands in the upper half of a crowded field of deep 20% buffer funds on our review.
  • PSFJ Costs 0.49% a year against a 0.74% median for 20% S&P 500 buffer funds, and undercuts the 0.74% AllianzIM month-series funds (JUNW, AUGW, DECW) built on the same reference.
  • Deep cushion by design: it aims to absorb the first 20% of a decline in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over each roughly one-year period, before fees and expenses.paceretfs.com
  • Live since 2021, with several annual reset cycles behind it and sibling funds (PSFM, PSFD) covering other start months. One of the stronger builds in a crowded 20% buffer field.

Worth knowing

  • APRW Upside is capped, and the cap is reset each April at whatever options cost then. Buffer and cap apply to the full period, so mid-period exits get neither intact.
  • 0.74% is the going rate here, not a discount: PSFM and PSFJ charge 0.49% and PBFR 0.50% for 20% buffers.
  • Modest assets and light trading versus the category's biggest names, so limit orders matter. The structure targets price outcomes, not income.
  • PSFJ The price of the cushion is a ceiling. Upside is capped at a level set when each July outcome period begins, so a roaring market leaves gains on the table.paceretfs.com
  • Buffer and cap are designed to work over the full outcome period. Buy mid-period and the cushion remaining and the room left to run differ from the stated terms.paceretfs.com
  • A smaller, thinly traded fund, so spreads can run wider than in the biggest names in the group. Income is not part of the design either.

Full APRW profile⁠

Full PSFJ profile⁠

APRW vs PSFJ Holdings

How APRW and PSFJ differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of APRW and 0.0% of PSFJ.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%
  • Sector11 Sectors100%

Sector

Sector weights in APRW and PSFJ, widest gap first
SectorMore in APRWMore in PSFJ
TechnologySame weight
FinancialsSame weight
CommunicationSame weight
Health CareSame weight
Consumer DiscretionarySame weight
IndustrialsSame weight
Consumer StaplesSame weight
EnergySame weight
UtilitiesSame weight
Real EstateSame weight
MaterialsSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in APRW and PSFJ, widest gap first
CountryMore in APRWMore in PSFJ
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • APRW108.7%
  • PSFJ103.1%

Securities held

  • APRW2
  • PSFJ3

Asset class

APRW
Equity
PSFJ
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in APRW2
  • In both0
  • Only in PSFJ3

Only in APRW

2 securities, 100% of APRW by weight

  • Spy 03/31/2027 4.88 C107.52%
  • Spy 03/31/2027 650.41 P1.22%

Only in PSFJ

3 securities, 100% of PSFJ by weight

  • Spy 06/30/2027 8.36 C97.95%
  • Spy 06/30/2027 746.77 P4.02%
  • Spy 06/30/2027 448.06 P0.37%

Weight gaps

APRW and PSFJ share no securities.

All 5 APRW holdings⁠All 7 PSFJ holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

APRW vs PSFJ Cost

Overpaying APRW vs PSFJ

$4,515

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • APRW 0.74%

    $14,307

  • PSFJ 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • APRW 0.74%
  • PSFJ 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530APRW $14,307PSFJ $9,792

Year by year

YearAPRWPSFJOverpaying
10$1,319$883$436
20$5,015$3,394$1,621
30$14,307$9,792$4,515

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%APRW
  • 0.49%PSFJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
  • Median 0.74%

PSFJ cheapest of 24 funds

APRW 10th cheapest of 24 funds

APRW vs PSFJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
APRW 0.00%
PSFJ No data
Payout (12M)
APRW None
PSFJ None

Distribution history

Per share, 2020, same scale for both

APRW1 paymentAll APRW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2020. Dec 15, 2020 $0.70. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502020
PSFJAll PSFJ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

APRW vs PSFJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • APRW
  • PSFJ
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: PSFJ −12.2% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−6%−4%−2%0%Nov 2021Apr 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
APRW 4.8%, betterPSFJ 7.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
APRW 1.27PSFJ 1.51, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
APRW −9.6%, betterPSFJ −12.2%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
APRW 0.35PSFJ 0.55

Popular comparisons

  • APRWCvsBALTB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Apr ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFJBvsBALTB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • APRWCvsPSFDB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Apr ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFJBvsPSFDB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • APRWCvsPSFOB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Apr ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFJBvsPSFOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.