BATT ranks 4th and CARZ 5th of 7 funds in the EV & Battery Category.
BATT vs CARZ
BATT −0.11pt a year
0.59%0.70%
BATT 10.0×the volume
41.1K4.13K
CARZ +15.1pt
−5.9%+9.2%
BATT vs CARZ Performance
−26.0%+55.5%
- BATT 0.59%, better
- CARZ 0.70%
- BATT $89M
- CARZ $41M
- BATT −2.8%
- CARZ +25.4%, better
- BATT 1.99%, better
- CARZ 1.15%
- BATT 53
- CARZ 105
- BATT 41.1K sh, better
- CARZ 4.13K sh
- BATT $12.52
- CARZ $90.25
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BATT | CARZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B62Higher | F18 |
| Mission | B59 | |
| Risk | C41 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | C46 | B58Higher |
| Holdings | D31 | B62Higher |
| Durability | B63Higher | B62 |
Rank among EV & Battery funds
Same Category. BATT and CARZ are both graded against the same 7 EV & Battery funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BATTC
CARZC
In short
BATT Most EV funds buy the carmakers. BATT buys the battery, tracking a global index of roughly 50 lithium and battery-technology companies. It has been running since 2018 and charges less than the typical fund in its category.
CARZ A 2011 vintage that changed lanes. It spent its first decade tracking global carmakers, then in 2022 switched to an index of roughly 100 worldwide names across electric and autonomous vehicles, the tech that runs them, and the materials inside them.
Stated mandate
BATT The Fund seeks to track the EQM Lithium & Battery Technology Index before fees and expenses through passive indexing; it normally invests at least 80% of net assets in securities comprising the Index.
CARZ The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the S-Network Electric & Future Vehicle Ecosystem Index, which focuses on companies involved in electric and autonomous vehicles and related enabling materials and technologies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BATT vs CARZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BATT vs CARZ Cost
Overpaying CARZ vs BATT
$1,971
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BATT 0.59%
$11,635
CARZ 0.70%
$13,606
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BATT | CARZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $1,250 | $192 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $4,760 | $709 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $13,606 | $1,971 |
- 0.59%BATT, cheaper
- 0.70%CARZ
- Middle half of EV & Battery funds
- Median 0.68%
BATT 3rd cheapest of 7 funds
CARZ 7th cheapest of 7 funds
BATT vs CARZ Dividends
- BATT 1.99%, better
- CARZ 1.15%
- BATT $0.26
- CARZ $1.08
- BATT $0.26
- CARZ $1.08
- BATT Dec 30, 2025
- CARZ Dec 12, 2025
- BATT Dec 31, 2025
- CARZ Dec 31, 2025
- BATT Annual
- CARZ Quarterly
Distribution history
BATT vs CARZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BATT
- CARZ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BATT 27.2%CARZ 26.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BATT 0.37CARZ 0.89, better
- Worst fall
- BATT −61.4%CARZ −40.0%, better
- Market sensitivity
- BATT 1.49CARZ 1.60
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.48%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.48%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.68%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.68%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.