BBCA ranks 4th and EDEN 33rd of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
BBCA vs EDEN
BBCA −0.34pt a year
0.19%0.53%
BBCA 33.7×the volume
330K9.78K
BBCA +9.2pt
+11.5%+2.3%
BBCA vs EDEN Performance
+72.5%+11.9%
- BBCA 0.19%, better
- EDEN 0.53%
- BBCA $11.9B
- EDEN $186M
- BBCA +22.1%, better
- EDEN +10.3%
- BBCA 1.68%
- EDEN 2.96%, better
- BBCA 78
- EDEN 44
- BBCA 330K sh, better
- EDEN 9.78K sh
- BBCA $104.51
- EDEN $116.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BBCA | EDEN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82Higher | D30 |
| Mission | B59Higher | C47 |
| Risk | A87Higher | F19 |
| Tradability | B55Higher | C43 |
| Holdings | A76Higher | C46 |
| Durability | B58Higher | B56 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. BBCA and EDEN are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BBCAA
EDEND
In short
BBCA Canada, at a discount. BBCA tracks a Morningstar index of roughly 80 Canadian stocks for 0.19% a year, a fraction of what most single-country funds charge, and it has grown into a multi-billion-dollar fund since its 2018 launch.
EDEN One ticker, one small country. EDEN tracks a capped index of Danish stocks, so a short list of Copenhagen names carries the load. Running since 2012, it is the narrow way to own Denmark instead of all of Europe.
Stated mandate
BBCA The fund seeks to track the Morningstar Canada Target Market Exposure Index before fees and expenses. It uses a passive indexing approach to approximate the index rather than outperform it.
EDEN The fund seeks to track an index composed of Danish equities, providing targeted exposure to companies in Denmark.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BBCA vs EDEN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BBCA vs EDEN Cost
Overpaying EDEN vs BBCA
$6,584
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BBCA 0.19%
$3,952
EDEN 0.53%
$10,536
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BBCA | EDEN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $347 | $953 | $606 |
| 20 | $1,351 | $3,658 | $2,307 |
| 30 | $3,952 | $10,536 | $6,584 |
- 0.19%BBCA, cheaper
- 0.53%EDEN
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
BBCA 7th cheapest of 38 funds
EDEN 26th cheapest of 38 funds
BBCA vs EDEN Dividends
- BBCA 1.68%
- EDEN 2.96%, better
- BBCA $1.75
- EDEN $3.45
- BBCA $0.42
- EDEN $1.89
- BBCA Sep 22, 2026
- EDEN Jun 15, 2026
- BBCA Sep 24, 2026
- EDEN Jun 18, 2026
- BBCA Quarterly
- EDEN Twice a year
Distribution history
BBCA vs EDEN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BBCA
- EDEN
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BBCA 12.9%, betterEDEN 17.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- BBCA 1.55, betterEDEN 0.28
- Worst fall
- BBCA −24.4%, betterEDEN −35.5%
- Market sensitivity
- BBCA 0.88EDEN 0.66
BBCA and EDEN in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.19% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

