FLGB ranks 3rd and EDEN 33rd of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
EDEN vs FLGB
FLGB −0.44pt a year
0.53%0.09%
FLGB 10.8×the volume
9.78K106K
FLGB +9.4pt
+2.3%+11.7%
EDEN vs FLGB Performance
+11.9%+74.3%
- EDEN 0.53%
- FLGB 0.09%, better
- EDEN $186M
- FLGB $878M
- EDEN +10.3%
- FLGB +15.9%, better
- EDEN 2.96%, better
- FLGB 2.87%
- EDEN 44
- FLGB 89
- EDEN 9.78K sh
- FLGB 106K sh, better
- EDEN $116.54
- FLGB $36.82
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EDEN | FLGB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D30 | A93Higher |
| Mission | C47 | A73Higher |
| Risk | F19 | A73Higher |
| Tradability | C43 | B62Higher |
| Holdings | C46 | A72Higher |
| Durability | B56Higher | C53 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. EDEN and FLGB are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EDEND
FLGBA
In short
EDEN One ticker, one small country. EDEN tracks a capped index of Danish stocks, so a short list of Copenhagen names carries the load. Running since 2012, it is the narrow way to own Denmark instead of all of Europe.
FLGB Britain in one ticker for nine basis points. Franklin's UK tracker follows a capped FTSE index of roughly 110 British companies and charges a small fraction of what the typical index fund in its peer group costs.
Stated mandate
EDEN The fund seeks to track an index composed of Danish equities, providing targeted exposure to companies in Denmark.
FLGB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the FTSE UK RIC Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EDEN vs FLGB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EDEN vs FLGB Cost
Overpaying EDEN vs FLGB
$8,638
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EDEN 0.53%
$10,536
FLGB 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EDEN | FLGB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $953 | $165 | $788 |
| 20 | $3,658 | $646 | $3,012 |
| 30 | $10,536 | $1,898 | $8,638 |
- 0.53%EDEN
- 0.09%FLGB, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
FLGB cheapest of 38 funds
EDEN 26th cheapest of 38 funds
EDEN vs FLGB Dividends
- EDEN 2.96%, better
- FLGB 2.87%
- EDEN $3.45
- FLGB $1.06
- EDEN $1.89
- FLGB $0.47
- EDEN Jun 15, 2026
- FLGB Jun 26, 2026
- EDEN Jun 18, 2026
- FLGB Jul 6, 2026
- EDEN Twice a year
- FLGB Twice a year
Distribution history
EDEN vs FLGB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EDEN
- FLGB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EDEN 17.3%FLGB 11.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EDEN 0.28FLGB 1.44, better
- Worst fall
- EDEN −35.5%FLGB −25.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EDEN 0.66FLGB 0.75
EDEN and FLGB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.53% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


