EDEN vs EWC

EDENDiShares MSCI Denmark ETF

EWCAiShares MSCI Canada ETF

In short

EDEN One ticker, one small country. EDEN tracks a capped index of Danish stocks, so a short list of Copenhagen names carries the load. Running since 2012, it is the narrow way to own Denmark instead of all of Europe.

EWC A 1996 original: Canada's large and mid caps in one ticker, back when single-country funds were still a novelty. About 80 names, held through a capped MSCI index built so one giant can't swamp the basket.

Stated mandate

EDEN The fund seeks to track an index composed of Danish equities, providing targeted exposure to companies in Denmark.

EWC The fund seeks to track an index representing Canadian equities, providing exposure to large- and mid-sized companies in Canada.

Why people hold it

• EDEN Pure Denmark, undiluted: the mandate is an index of Danish equities, not a Nordic or pan-European blend, so the country you picked is the country you get.
• The 25/50 capping built into its index limits how heavy any one issuer can become, a useful guardrail in a market where a few giants tower over the rest.
• An IMI index and roughly 40 stocks means large, mid and small caps in one line item, not only the blue-chip headliners.
• Listed since 2012 under the iShares banner, so there is more than a decade of operating history behind the ticker.

• EWC Running since 1996, which makes it one of the oldest US-listed ETFs still trading, and it is a multi-billion-dollar fund today.
• Tracks the MSCI Canada Custom Capped Index closely, one of the tighter index-following records in its single-country developed peer group.ishares.com
• Actively traded with among the easiest fills in its peer group, so the cost of getting in and out stays modest.
• The capped index trims outsized single-name weights, so roughly 80 holdings stay a basket rather than a wager on two or three giants.ishares.com

Worth knowing

• EDEN The 0.53% annual fee sits above the middle of the single-country developed pack, where rivals like FLKR and FLAU run at 0.09%.
• Thinly traded and modest in size, so spreads can widen and fills get lumpier than in a mega-fund. Trade size and timing matter more here.
• One small market, roughly 40 names: single-stock and sector moves land harder than in a broad international fund. On cost, trading and risk measures it sits in the lower reaches of its peer group.

• EWC At 0.50%, the fee sits right at the median for single-country developed funds, and cheaper Canada exposure exists: BBCA runs 0.19%.
• One country, about 80 stocks: a concentrated slice of the world, with Canadian dollar moves riding along in your US-dollar return.ishares.com
• Distributions land once or twice a year rather than monthly or quarterly, so income arrives in lumps.

Full EDEN profile⁠

Full EWC profile⁠