Skip to content

BDGS vs RISN

Bridges Capital Tactical ETF

BDGSBNasdaq

Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

RISNANYSE Arca

Overlap

1.5%by weight

Expense ratio

RISN −0.15pt a year

BDGS0.87%RISN0.72%

Avg volume · 30D

RISN 2.9×the volume

BDGS5.04KRISN14.8K

3Y return · a year

BDGS +1.6pt

BDGS+14.9%RISN+13.3%

BDGS vs RISN Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+5.1%BDGS+4.8%RISN

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BDGS +5.1%. RISN +4.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%−2.5%0%7.5%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BDGS 0.87%
RISN 0.72%, better
Fund size
BDGS $42M
RISN $70M
1Y total return
BDGS +5.1%, better
RISN +4.8%
Yield (12M)
BDGS 0.52%
RISN 1.05%, better
Holdings
BDGS 13
RISN 53
Avg volume (30D)
BDGS 5.04K sh
RISN 14.8K sh, better
NAV per share
BDGS $36.59
RISN $31.09
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BDGS: Cost 59, Risk 71, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings 43, Durability 51. RISN: Cost 76, Risk 46, Mission 85, Tradability 64, Holdings 80, Durability 68.
Pillar letters and Scores for BDGS, RISN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBDGSRISN
Cost30% weightB59A76Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA85
Risk15% weightA71HigherC46
Tradability15% weightC50B64Higher
Holdings10% weightC43A80Higher
Durability5% weightC51B68Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BDGS and RISN are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

RISN ranks 4th and BDGS 18th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 4ARISNInspire Capital Appreciation ETFScore 71
  5. Rank 5BPBLPGIM Portfolio Ballast ETFScore 69
  6. Rank 16BTDSBETC Cabana Target Beta ETFScore 57
  7. Rank 18BBDGSBridges Capital Tactical ETFScore 56
  8. Rank 18BGMOMCambria Global Momentum ETFScore 56

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BDGSBBridges Capital Tactical ETF

RISNAInspire Capital Appreciation ETF

In short

BDGS A tactical fund that publishes its dial settings: roughly 75% index ETFs and 5% cash in risk-on mode, roughly 80% cash in risk-off mode, plus a standing sleeve of about 10 large-cap stocks. 0.87%, no waiver.

RISN A tactical blend of U.S. large-cap stocks and U.S. bonds from a values-screening shop, built to chase long-term growth with less turbulence than the large-cap market, at a fee below the typical tactical peer.

Stated mandate

BDGS The Fund is an actively managed, diversified ETF investing in a mix of U.S. equity index ETFs, large-capitalization stocks, and cash or cash equivalents. Its allocation and rebalancing respond to macroeconomic conditions, market breadth, and volatility.

RISN The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation with lower volatility than the U.S. large-cap stock market.

Why people hold it

  • BDGS The playbook sits in the prospectus: about 75% index ETFs and 5% cash when the macro read is risk-on, about 80% cash and 20% stocks when it is not. Unusually specific.sec.gov
  • The macro call shifts less than once a year by design. Rebalancing happens inside that gear: roughly twice a month in defensive stretches, about six times a year when bullish.sec.govsec.gov 2
  • The stock sleeve is roughly 10 large-cap names held for the long haul, sold when a company drops out of its index's top 10 or the manager sees a risk to the long-term story.sec.gov
  • 0.87% with no fee waiver, near what tactical-allocation funds typically charge. Cheaper shelves exist in the group, like ENDW at 0.22%. Rates in the upper half of its peer group.
  • RISN Charges 0.72% a year, under the going rate for tactical multi-asset funds that actively shift their mix.
  • One ticket holds U.S. large-cap equities alongside U.S. fixed income, with the stated aim of long-term appreciation at lower volatility than U.S. large caps.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded tactical multi-asset field, with a live record going back to its 2020 launch.
  • Pays out quarterly, so the bond sleeve shows up as scheduled cash rather than a once-a-year surprise.

Worth knowing

  • BDGS A small fund whose shares trade lightly, so spreads can run wider than on mega-cap index ETFs and bigger orders can move the price.
  • Turnover is high by design. The prospectus notes that can mean higher transaction costs and, in taxable accounts, higher taxes.sec.gov
  • Listed in 2023, so the live record is short, and the prospectus flags that cash-heavy stretches can trail the benchmark in a rising market.etfarchitect.com
  • RISN Thinly traded and modest in size, so bid-ask spreads can matter more than the fee does. Limit orders are the standard workaround.
  • Tactical means judgment calls: the allocation can look nothing like a fixed stock/bond blend at any given moment.
  • Cheap for tactical, not cheap outright. Peers such as ENDW (0.22%) and ONOF (0.39%) run at a fraction of the fee.

Full BDGS profile⁠

Full RISN profile⁠

BDGS vs RISN Holdings

How BDGS and RISN differ

Overlap by weight

1.5%

Shared holdings make up 3.0% of BDGS and 1.5% of RISN.

Level by level

  • Holdings1 in both1.5%
  • Sector11 Sectors39.3%
  • Countryby domicile99.1%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in BDGS and RISN, widest gap first
SectorMore in BDGSMore in RISN
TechnologyBDGS +34.5 points
IndustrialsRISN +21.3 points
FinancialsRISN +19.2 points
CommunicationBDGS +13.5 points
EnergyRISN +12.7 points
MaterialsRISN +6.9 points
Health CareBDGS +5.7 points
Consumer DiscretionaryBDGS +5.5 points
Consumer StaplesBDGS +1.5 points
UtilitiesRISN +0.3 points
Real EstateRISN +0.3 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BDGS and RISN, widest gap first
CountryMore in BDGSMore in RISN
United StatesRISN +0.9 points
Other countries (11)BDGS +0.9 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • BDGS97.4%
  • RISN35.2%

Securities held

  • BDGS12
  • RISN52

Asset class

BDGS
Equity
RISN
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in BDGS11
  • In both1
  • Only in RISN51

Only in BDGS

11 securities, 96.2% of BDGS by weight

  • United States Treasury Bill 01/19/202739.97%
  • Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF36.45%
  • Micron Technology Inc2.99%

Only in RISN

51 securities, 98.6% of RISN by weight

  • Wisdomtree Float19.09%
  • United Parcel-B1.82%
  • Home Depot Inc1.82%

Weight gaps

All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in BDGS and RISN, widest gap first
HoldingMore in BDGSMore in RISN
Broadcom IncAVGOBDGS +1.51 points

All BDGS holdings⁠All RISN holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BDGS vs RISN Cost

Overpaying BDGS vs RISN

$2,579

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BDGS 0.87%

    $16,536

  • RISN 0.72%

    $13,957

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BDGS 0.87%
  • RISN 0.72%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BDGS $16,536RISN $13,957

Year by year

YearBDGSRISNOverpaying
10$1,542$1,284$258
20$5,830$4,888$942
30$16,536$13,957$2,579

Expense ratio

  • 0.87%BDGS
  • 0.72%RISN, cheaper
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

RISN 12th cheapest of 46 funds

BDGS 19th cheapest of 46 funds

BDGS vs RISN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
BDGS 0.52%
RISN 1.05%, better
Payout (12M)
BDGS $0.19
RISN $0.32
Last payment
BDGS $0.19
RISN $0.08
Ex-dividend
BDGS Dec 23, 2025
RISN Sep 25, 2026
Paid on
BDGS Dec 24, 2025
RISN Oct 1, 2026
Frequency
BDGS Annual
RISN Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2020 to 2026, same scale for both

BDGSAnnual · 3 paymentsAll BDGS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Dec 20, 2023 $0.23; Dec 30, 2024 $0.57; Dec 23, 2025 $0.19. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.50202020232026YTD
RISNQuarterly · 24 paymentsAll RISN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 24 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Sep 25, 2020 $0.03; Dec 14, 2020 $1.16; Dec 30, 2020 $0.01; Mar 26, 2021 $0.03; Jun 25, 2021 $0.05; Sep 24, 2021 $0.05; Dec 14, 2021 $2.65; Sep 23, 2022 $0.06; Dec 14, 2022 $0.23; Mar 27, 2023 $0.13; Jun 23, 2023 $0.15; Sep 22, 2023 $0.11; Dec 14, 2023 $0.13; Mar 27, 2024 $0.08; Jun 25, 2024 $0.06; Sep 25, 2024 $0.10; Dec 16, 2024 $0.13; Mar 27, 2025 $0.04; Jun 26, 2025 $0.06; Sep 26, 2025 $0.12; Dec 17, 2025 $0.07; Mar 27, 2026 $0.07; Jun 26, 2026 $0.10; Sep 25, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.50202020232026YTD

BDGS vs RISN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BDGS 7.9%, betterRISN 11.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BDGS 1.25, betterRISN 0.77
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BDGS −9.1%since May 2023RISN −21.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BDGS 0.59RISN 1.08

Popular comparisons

  • BDGSBvsENDWA

    Bridges Capital Tactical ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.87% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsENDWA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BDGSBvsGMODA

    Bridges Capital Tactical ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.87% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsGMODA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BDGSBvsPTBDA

    Bridges Capital Tactical ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.87% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsPTBDA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.