OILK ranks 1st and BNO 7th of 11 funds in the Energy Futures Category.
BNO vs OILK
OILK −0.45pt a year
1.15%0.70%
BNO 16.2×the volume
1.83M113K
BNO +11.7pt
+17.8%+6.1%
BNO vs OILK Performance
+220.9%+130.6%
- BNO 1.15%
- OILK 0.70%, better
- BNO $946M
- OILK $259M
- BNO +141.4%, better
- OILK +89.1%
- BNO
- OILK 15.32%
- BNO 10
- OILK 2
- BNO 1.83M sh, better
- OILK 113K sh
- BNO $71.97
- OILK $62.65
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BNO | OILK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D30 | A93Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C46 | B69Higher |
| Tradability | B58 | B68Higher |
| Holdings | D28 | |
| Durability | B67 | A72Higher |
Rank among Energy Futures funds
Same Category. BNO and OILK are both graded against the same 11 Energy Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BNOC
OILKA
In short
BNO Most US oil funds follow WTI. BNO follows Brent, the barrel the rest of the world prices off, through short-term Brent futures. Running since 2010, it is a plain wrapper on that specific price.
OILK The only crude oil ETF that spares you a Schedule K-1. OILK sends a 1099 instead, and its index spreads WTI futures across three roll schedules rather than camping in the front month. All-in cost: 0.70%.
Stated mandate
BNO BNO seeks to track daily percentage changes in Brent crude oil’s spot price through a specified short-term Brent crude oil futures contract, plus collateral interest and less expenses.
OILK The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil IndexSM.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BNO vs OILK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BNO vs OILK Cost
Overpaying BNO vs OILK
$7,471
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BNO 1.15%
$21,077
OILK 0.70%
$13,606
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BNO | OILK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,015 | $1,250 | $765 |
| 20 | $7,521 | $4,760 | $2,761 |
| 30 | $21,077 | $13,606 | $7,471 |
- 1.15%BNO
- 0.70%OILK, cheaper
- Middle half of Energy Futures funds
- Median 1.01%
OILK cheapest of 11 funds
BNO 8th cheapest of 11 funds
BNO vs OILK Dividends
- BNO
- OILK 15.32%
- BNO None
- OILK $9.54
- BNO
- OILK $2.57
- BNO
- OILK Oct 1, 2026
- BNO
- OILK Oct 7, 2026
- BNO
- OILK Monthly
Distribution history
BNO vs OILK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BNO
- OILK
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BNO 41.7%OILK 26.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BNO 0.77, betterOILK 0.65
- Worst fall
- BNO −34.5%, betterOILK −34.6%
- Market sensitivity
- BNO 2.16OILK 1.37
BNO and OILK in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.15% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.15% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.15% · 0.86%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.86%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



