UCO ranks 2nd and BOIL 6th of 6 funds in the 2x/3x Long Energy Category.
BOIL vs UCO
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
BOIL 2.1×the volume
5.56M2.69M
UCO +53.0pt
−59.2%−6.2%
BOIL vs UCO Performance
−99.9%+146.1%
- BOIL 0.95%
- UCO 0.95%
- BOIL $424M
- UCO $453M
- BOIL −73.4%
- UCO +180.5%, better
- BOIL 1
- UCO 1
- BOIL 5.56M sh, better
- UCO 2.69M sh
- BOIL $15.94
- UCO $60.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BOIL | UCO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D32 | D32 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F12 | C52Higher |
| Tradability | C50 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B65 | A70Higher |
Rank among 2x/3x Long Energy funds
Same Category. BOIL and UCO are both graded against the same 6 2x/3x Long Energy funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BOILD
UCOC
In short
BOIL The only natural gas play in a leveraged energy aisle full of oil and energy stocks. BOIL aims for two times the daily move of a Bloomberg natural gas futures index, in a market known for violent swings.
UCO Most leveraged energy funds juice oil-company stocks. UCO levers the barrel itself: 2x the daily move of a WTI futures index that spreads across three roll schedules instead of camping in the front-month contract.
Stated mandate
BOIL The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the daily performance of the Bloomberg Natural Gas Subindex SM.
UCO UCO seeks daily results, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the daily performance of the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BOIL vs UCO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BOIL vs UCO Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BOIL 0.95%
$17,869
UCO 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BOIL | UCO |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%BOIL
- 0.95%UCO
- Middle half of 2x/3x Long Energy funds
- Median 0.94%
BOIL 4th cheapest of 6 funds
UCO 4th cheapest of 6 funds
BOIL vs UCO Dividends
- BOIL None
- UCO None
Distribution history
BOIL vs UCO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BOIL
- UCO
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BOIL 94.9%UCO 53.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BOIL −0.82UCO 0.63, better
- Worst fall
- BOIL −99.9%UCO −67.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- BOIL 3.18UCO 2.79
BOIL and UCO in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.91%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.91%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

