DDM ranks 4th and BTGD 84th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
BTGD vs DDM
DDM −0.14pt a year
1.09%0.95%
DDM 8.1×the volume
23K185K
BTGD vs DDM Performance
−44.9%+13.4%
- BTGD 1.09%
- DDM 0.95%, better
- BTGD $46M
- DDM $507M
- BTGD −44.9%
- DDM +13.4%, better
- BTGD 5.12%, better
- DDM 0.98%
- BTGD 4
- DDM 34
- BTGD 23K sh
- DDM 185K sh, better
- BTGD $24.69
- DDM $62.99
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BTGD | DDM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F17 | C51Higher |
| Mission | F16 | A92Higher |
| Risk | F24 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | B56 | A93Higher |
| Holdings | D32 | C53Higher |
| Durability | B60 | A79Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. BTGD and DDM are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BTGDD
DDMB
In short
BTGD One ticker, two hard-money bets: every dollar in targets about a dollar of bitcoin exposure and a dollar of gold exposure, stacked on top of each other with futures inside a 1940 Act fund.
DDM The Dow dates to 1896. DDM is the only ETF built to double its daily move: 2x the Dow Jones Industrial Average, reset every single day, for 0.95% a year, running since 2006.
Stated mandate
BTGD The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed strategy combining bitcoin and gold exposures, obtained through U.S.-listed futures contracts and pooled investment vehicles.
DDM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BTGD vs DDM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BTGD vs DDM Cost
Overpaying BTGD vs DDM
$2,264
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BTGD 1.09%
$20,133
DDM 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BTGD | DDM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,915 | $1,678 | $237 |
| 20 | $7,166 | $6,322 | $844 |
| 30 | $20,133 | $17,869 | $2,264 |
- 1.09%BTGD
- 0.95%DDM, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
DDM 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
BTGD 82nd cheapest of 95 funds
BTGD vs DDM Dividends
- BTGD 5.12%, better
- DDM 0.98%
- BTGD $1.15
- DDM $0.62
- BTGD $1.15
- DDM $0.15
- BTGD Dec 30, 2025
- DDM Sep 23, 2026
- BTGD Dec 31, 2025
- DDM Sep 29, 2026
- BTGD Irregular
- DDM Quarterly
Distribution history
BTGD vs DDM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BTGD 54.5%DDM 24.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- BTGD 0.27DDM 0.96
- Worst fall
- BTGD −58.8%DDM −40.2%
- Market sensitivity
- BTGD 1.84DDM 1.74
Popular comparisons
- 1.09% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.09% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.09% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.