QLD ranks 1st and BTGD 84th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
BTGD vs QLD
QLD −0.20pt a year
1.09%0.89%
QLD 180.5×the volume
23K4.15M
BTGD vs QLD Performance
−44.9%+10.7%
- BTGD 1.09%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- BTGD $46M
- QLD $13.3B
- BTGD −44.9%
- QLD +10.7%, better
- BTGD 5.12%, better
- QLD 0.15%
- BTGD 4
- QLD 113
- BTGD 23K sh
- QLD 4.15M sh, better
- BTGD $24.69
- QLD $82.56
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BTGD | QLD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F17 | A72Higher |
| Mission | F16 | A95Higher |
| Risk | F24 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | B56 | A100Higher |
| Holdings | D32 | A72Higher |
| Durability | B60 | A81Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. BTGD and QLD are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BTGDD
QLDA
In short
BTGD One ticker, two hard-money bets: every dollar in targets about a dollar of bitcoin exposure and a dollar of gold exposure, stacked on top of each other with futures inside a 1940 Act fund.
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
Stated mandate
BTGD The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed strategy combining bitcoin and gold exposures, obtained through U.S.-listed futures contracts and pooled investment vehicles.
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BTGD vs QLD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BTGD vs QLD Cost
Overpaying BTGD vs QLD
$3,261
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BTGD 1.09%
$20,133
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BTGD | QLD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,915 | $1,576 | $339 |
| 20 | $7,166 | $5,953 | $1,213 |
| 30 | $20,133 | $16,872 | $3,261 |
- 1.09%BTGD
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
BTGD 82nd cheapest of 95 funds
BTGD vs QLD Dividends
- BTGD 5.12%, better
- QLD 0.15%
- BTGD $1.15
- QLD $0.12
- BTGD $1.15
- QLD $0.03
- BTGD Dec 30, 2025
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- BTGD Dec 31, 2025
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- BTGD Irregular
- QLD Quarterly
Distribution history
BTGD vs QLD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BTGD 54.5%QLD 36.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- BTGD 0.27QLD 1.04
- Worst fall
- BTGD −58.8%QLD −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- BTGD 1.84QLD 2.46
BTGD and QLD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.09% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.09% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.09% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
