BUFC ranks 4th and LOCT 14th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
BUFC vs LOCT
BUFC −0.10pt a year
0.69%0.79%
BUFC 24.8×the volume
49.5K1.99K
BUFC vs LOCT Performance
+5.8%+5.4%
- BUFC 0.69%, better
- LOCT 0.79%
- BUFC $1.11B
- LOCT $11M
- BUFC +5.8%, better
- LOCT +5.4%
- BUFC
- LOCT 5.66%
- BUFC 4
- LOCT 12
- BUFC 49.5K sh, better
- LOCT 1.99K sh
- BUFC $43.25
- LOCT $23.78
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BUFC | LOCT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B57Higher | D35 |
| Mission | D34 | |
| Risk | C41 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | B62Higher | B56 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A74Higher | C51 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. BUFC and LOCT are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BUFCB
LOCTC
In short
BUFC Most buffer funds lock you into a 12-month outcome period. BUFC resets every three months, targeting 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 with roughly 3% of the upside per period. Deep cushion, short leash.
LOCT Most buffer funds trade your upside for a capped shot at growth. LOCT trades it for income: a defined distribution rate paid monthly, with the first 15% of SPY's losses absorbed over each 12-month outcome period.
Stated mandate
BUFC The Fund is an actively managed equity ETF seeking conservative capital appreciation with potential partial downside protection. It uses options to establish an upside cap and downside protection over rolling three-month periods, targeting 15% downside protection and about 3% upside participation to the S&P 500.
LOCT The Fund seeks performance equal to its Defined Distribution Rate for each Outcome Period while protecting against the first 15% of SPY losses during each 12-month Outcome Period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BUFC vs LOCT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BUFC vs LOCT Cost
Overpaying LOCT vs BUFC
$1,745
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BUFC 0.69%
$13,429
LOCT 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BUFC | LOCT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $1,405 | $173 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $5,331 | $634 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $15,174 | $1,745 |
- 0.69%BUFC, cheaper
- 0.79%LOCT
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
BUFC 17th cheapest of 51 funds
LOCT 24th cheapest of 51 funds
BUFC vs LOCT Dividends
- BUFC
- LOCT 5.66%
- BUFC None
- LOCT $1.35
- BUFC
- LOCT $0.11
- BUFC
- LOCT Oct 30, 2026
- BUFC
- LOCT Pays Nov 2, 2026
- BUFC
- LOCT Monthly
Distribution history
BUFC vs LOCT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BUFC 3.4%LOCT 1.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- BUFC 0.82LOCT 0.78
- Worst fall
- BUFC −8.3%LOCT −4.7%
- Market sensitivity
- BUFC 0.26LOCT 0.11
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.