PSMJ ranks 2nd and LOCT 14th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
LOCT vs PSMJ
PSMJ −0.30pt a year
0.79%0.49%
PSMJ 3.3×the volume
1.99K6.64K
PSMJ +8.5pt
+5.9%+14.4%
LOCT vs PSMJ Performance
+5.4%+8.2%
- LOCT 0.79%
- PSMJ 0.49%, better
- LOCT $11M
- PSMJ $108M
- LOCT +5.4%
- PSMJ +8.2%, better
- LOCT 5.66%, better
- PSMJ 0.00%
- LOCT 12
- PSMJ 3
- LOCT 1.99K sh
- PSMJ 6.64K sh, better
- LOCT $23.78
- PSMJ $34.43
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LOCT | PSMJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D35 | A70Higher |
| Mission | D34 | |
| Risk | B68Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | B56Higher | C50 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C51 | B63Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. LOCT and PSMJ are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LOCTC
PSMJB
In short
LOCT Most buffer funds trade your upside for a capped shot at growth. LOCT trades it for income: a defined distribution rate paid monthly, with the first 15% of SPY's losses absorbed over each 12-month outcome period.
PSMJ Pacer's July-dated stop on the Swan SOS ladder: FLEX options on SPY that buffer the first 15% of a fall over a roughly one-year period, with upside capped in return. At 0.49%, it undercuts most of the buffer aisle.
Stated mandate
LOCT The Fund seeks performance equal to its Defined Distribution Rate for each Outcome Period while protecting against the first 15% of SPY losses during each 12-month Outcome Period.
PSMJ The Fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over an approximately one-year period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LOCT vs PSMJ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LOCT vs PSMJ Cost
Overpaying LOCT vs PSMJ
$5,382
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LOCT 0.79%
$15,174
PSMJ 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LOCT | PSMJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $883 | $522 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $3,394 | $1,937 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $9,792 | $5,382 |
- 0.79%LOCT
- 0.49%PSMJ, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
PSMJ 5th cheapest of 51 funds
LOCT 24th cheapest of 51 funds
LOCT vs PSMJ Dividends
- LOCT 5.66%, better
- PSMJ 0.00%
- LOCT $1.35
- PSMJ None
- LOCT $0.11
- PSMJ
- LOCT Oct 30, 2026
- PSMJ
- LOCT Pays Nov 2, 2026
- PSMJ
- LOCT Monthly
- PSMJ
Distribution history
LOCT vs PSMJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LOCT 1.7%, betterPSMJ 6.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- LOCT 0.78PSMJ 1.47, better
- Worst fall
- LOCT −4.7%PSMJ −10.9%
- Market sensitivity
- LOCT 0.11PSMJ 0.47
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.