Skip to content

LOCT vs PSMJ

Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF

LOCTCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

PSMJBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSMJ −0.30pt a year

LOCT0.79%PSMJ0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

PSMJ 3.3×the volume

LOCT1.99KPSMJ6.64K

3Y return · a year

PSMJ +8.5pt

LOCT+5.9%PSMJ+14.4%

LOCT vs PSMJ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+5.4%LOCT+8.2%PSMJ

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. LOCT +5.4%. PSMJ +8.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2%0%2%4%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
LOCT 0.79%
PSMJ 0.49%, better
Fund size
LOCT $11M
PSMJ $108M
1Y total return
LOCT +5.4%
PSMJ +8.2%, better
Yield (12M)
LOCT 5.66%, better
PSMJ 0.00%
Holdings
LOCT 12
PSMJ 3
Avg volume (30D)
LOCT 1.99K sh
PSMJ 6.64K sh, better
NAV per share
LOCT $23.78
PSMJ $34.43
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LOCT: Cost 35, Risk 68, Mission 34, Tradability 56, Holdings not scored, Durability 51. PSMJ: Cost 70, Risk 46, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings not scored, Durability 63.
Pillar letters and Scores for LOCT, PSMJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLOCTPSMJ
Cost30% weightD35A70Higher
Mission25% weightD34Not scored
Risk15% weightB68HigherC46
Tradability15% weightB56HigherC50
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightC51B63Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LOCT and PSMJ are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PSMJ ranks 2nd and LOCT 14th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 3BPSMRPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 13CPJULInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 49
  5. Rank 14CLOCTInnovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETFScore 48
  6. Rank 14CPMAYInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - MayScore 48

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

LOCTCInnovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF

PSMJBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

In short

LOCT Most buffer funds trade your upside for a capped shot at growth. LOCT trades it for income: a defined distribution rate paid monthly, with the first 15% of SPY's losses absorbed over each 12-month outcome period.

PSMJ Pacer's July-dated stop on the Swan SOS ladder: FLEX options on SPY that buffer the first 15% of a fall over a roughly one-year period, with upside capped in return. At 0.49%, it undercuts most of the buffer aisle.

Stated mandate

LOCT The Fund seeks performance equal to its Defined Distribution Rate for each Outcome Period while protecting against the first 15% of SPY losses during each 12-month Outcome Period.

PSMJ The Fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over an approximately one-year period.

Why people hold it

  • LOCT Income-first design. The fund seeks performance equal to its stated Defined Distribution Rate for each outcome period, and it pays monthly rather than hoarding returns for the reset.
  • The first 15% of SPY losses in each 12-month outcome period is absorbed by the structure, and the terms reset every October like clockwork.
  • The 0.79% fee sits right at the median for its buffer peer group and matches Innovator's Power Buffer siblings (POCT, PJUL) for the same wrapper work.
  • Built as a 1940 Act fund, not a bank-issued note, so the defined outcome doesn't ride on a single issuer's balance sheet.
  • PSMJ Charges 0.49% a year against a 0.79% median for its buffered-SPY cohort, the same 0.79% Innovator's Power Buffer funds (PJUL, PJAN, POCT) charge for a similar job.
  • The deal is legible: FLEX options on SPY absorb the first 15% of a decline over the outcome period, and match the ETF's gains up to a cap struck each July.paceretfs.compaceretfs.com 2
  • Those FLEX options are customizable exchange-traded contracts settled through the Options Clearing Corporation, and Durango-based Swan Global Management sub-advises the strategy.paceretfs.com
  • One of four Moderate-series funds with staggered start months (PSMD, PSMR, PSMJ, PSMO), so a July reset can be stacked against other entry points rather than standing alone.paceretfs.com

Worth knowing

  • LOCT Upside is defined, not open-ended. The target is the distribution rate, so a roaring year in SPY doesn't flow through as extra return.
  • Small asset base and thin trading. Limit orders and a glance at the spread matter more here than with a mainstream index fund.
  • The buffer is measured from the start of the October outcome period. Buy mid-period and you inherit whatever protection is left, not a fresh 15%.
  • PSMJ The 15% buffer and the cap belong to the full outcome period. Step in mid-period and you inherit whatever cap and buffer remain, not the starting terms.paceretfs.com
  • Thinly traded next to the largest buffer funds, so spreads and limit orders deserve more of your attention at the point of entry.
  • No regular income stream here: the options structure delivers its result through share price rather than distributions.paceretfs.com

Full LOCT profile⁠

Full PSMJ profile⁠

LOCT vs PSMJ Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LOCT vs PSMJ Cost

Overpaying LOCT vs PSMJ

$5,382

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LOCT 0.79%

    $15,174

  • PSMJ 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LOCT 0.79%
  • PSMJ 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530LOCT $15,174PSMJ $9,792

Year by year

YearLOCTPSMJOverpaying
10$1,405$883$522
20$5,331$3,394$1,937
30$15,174$9,792$5,382

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%LOCT
  • 0.49%PSMJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PSMJ 5th cheapest of 51 funds

LOCT 24th cheapest of 51 funds

LOCT vs PSMJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
LOCT 5.66%, better
PSMJ 0.00%
Payout (12M)
LOCT $1.35
PSMJ None
Last payment
LOCT $0.11
PSMJ No data
Ex-dividend
LOCT Oct 30, 2026
PSMJ No data
Paid on
LOCT Pays Nov 2, 2026
PSMJ No data
Frequency
LOCT Monthly
PSMJ No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

LOCTMonthly · 37 paymentsAll LOCT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 37 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Oct 30, 2023 $0.13; Nov 29, 2023 $0.13; Dec 28, 2023 $0.13; Jan 30, 2024 $0.13; Feb 28, 2024 $0.13; Mar 27, 2024 $0.13; Apr 29, 2024 $0.13; May 31, 2024 $0.13; Jun 28, 2024 $0.13; Jul 31, 2024 $0.13; Aug 30, 2024 $0.13; Sep 30, 2024 $0.13; Oct 31, 2024 $0.10; Nov 29, 2024 $0.10; Dec 31, 2024 $0.10; Jan 31, 2025 $0.10; Feb 28, 2025 $0.10; Mar 31, 2025 $0.10; Apr 30, 2025 $0.10; May 30, 2025 $0.10; Jun 30, 2025 $0.10; Jul 31, 2025 $0.10; Aug 29, 2025 $0.10; Sep 30, 2025 $0.10; Oct 31, 2025 $0.10; Nov 28, 2025 $0.10; Dec 31, 2025 $0.10; Jan 30, 2026 $0.10; Feb 27, 2026 $0.10; Mar 31, 2026 $0.10; Apr 30, 2026 $0.10; May 29, 2026 $0.10; Jun 30, 2026 $0.10; Jul 30, 2026 $0.10; Aug 31, 2026 $0.10; Sep 30, 2026 $0.10; Oct 30, 2026 $0.11. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.1020232026YTD
PSMJAll PSMJ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

LOCT vs PSMJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
LOCT 1.7%, betterPSMJ 6.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
LOCT 0.78PSMJ 1.47, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
LOCT −4.7%since Oct 2023PSMJ −10.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LOCT 0.11PSMJ 0.47

Popular comparisons

  • LOCTCvsPSMOB

    Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsPSMOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LOCTCvsPSMRB

    Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsPSMRB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LOCTCvsBUFCB

    Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsBUFCB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.