Skip to content

BUFC vs MARU

AB Conservative Buffer ETF

BUFCBNasdaq

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF

MARUDCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

BUFC −0.05pt a year

BUFC0.69%MARU0.74%

Avg volume · 30D

BUFC 41.6×the volume

BUFC49.5KMARU1.19K

BUFC vs MARU Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+5.8%BUFC+6.3%MARU

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BUFC +5.8%. MARU +6.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%−2.5%0%2.5%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BUFC 0.69%, better
MARU 0.74%
Fund size
BUFC $1.11B
MARU $35M
1Y total return
BUFC +5.8%
MARU +6.3%, better
Holdings
BUFC 4
MARU 2
Avg volume (30D)
BUFC 49.5K sh, better
MARU 1.19K sh
NAV per share
BUFC $43.25
MARU $30.13
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BUFC: Cost 57, Risk 41, Mission not scored, Tradability 62, Holdings not scored, Durability 74. MARU: Cost 51, Risk 11, Mission not scored, Tradability 27, Holdings 56, Durability 30.
Pillar letters and Scores for BUFC, MARU, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBUFCMARU
Cost30% weightB57HigherC51
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC41HigherF11
Tradability15% weightB62HigherD27
Holdings10% weightNot scoredB56
Durability5% weightA74HigherD30

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BUFC and MARU are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

BUFC ranks 4th and MARU 48th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 3BPSMRPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 4BBUFCAB Conservative Buffer ETFScore 55
  5. Rank 4CPOCTInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 55
  6. Rank 46DSPBUAllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETFScore 38
  7. Rank 48DMARUAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETFScore 37
  8. Rank 49DNVBUAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Nov ETFScore 36

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BUFCBAB Conservative Buffer ETF

MARUDAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF

In short

BUFC Most buffer funds lock you into a 12-month outcome period. BUFC resets every three months, targeting 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 with roughly 3% of the upside per period. Deep cushion, short leash.

MARU No data

Stated mandate

BUFC The Fund is an actively managed equity ETF seeking conservative capital appreciation with potential partial downside protection. It uses options to establish an upside cap and downside protection over rolling three-month periods, targeting 15% downside protection and about 3% upside participation to the S&P 500.

MARU No data

Why people hold it

  • BUFC Uses options to target 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 over rolling three-month periods, so the cushion resets four times a year instead of once.alliancebernstein.com
  • At 0.69%, it costs less than Innovator's 0.79% Power Buffer funds (PJUL, PJAN, POCT) and less than the typical fund in its buffer cohort.
  • Actively managed rather than pinned to a calendar index series, running since 2023, and among the stronger implementations in its buffer peer group.

MARU No data

Worth knowing

  • BUFC The price of that deep cushion: upside participation is targeted near 3% per three-month period, so big rallies mostly pass you by.
  • Protection is partial and period-based. Losses past the targeted 15% pass through, and buying mid-period shifts your effective buffer and cap.alliancebernstein.com
  • Thinly traded for its size, so spreads and limit orders deserve attention.

MARU No data

Full BUFC profile⁠

Full MARU profile⁠

BUFC vs MARU Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BUFC vs MARU Cost

Overpaying MARU vs BUFC

$878

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BUFC 0.69%

    $13,429

  • MARU 0.74%

    $14,307

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BUFC 0.69%
  • MARU 0.74%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530MARU $14,307BUFC $13,429

Year by year

YearBUFCMARUOverpaying
10$1,232$1,319$87
20$4,697$5,015$318
30$13,429$14,307$878

Expense ratio

  • 0.69%BUFC, cheaper
  • 0.74%MARU
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

BUFC 17th cheapest of 51 funds

MARU 18th cheapest of 51 funds

BUFC vs MARU Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
BUFC None
MARU None

Distribution history

BUFCAll BUFC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

MARUAll MARU payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BUFC vs MARU Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BUFC 3.4%since Jan 2024MARU 8.5%since Apr 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BUFC 0.82since Jan 2024MARU 1.14since Apr 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BUFC −8.3%since Dec 2023MARU −8.5%since Mar 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BUFC 0.26MARU 0.71

Popular comparisons

  • BUFCBvsPSMOB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MARUDvsPSMOB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFCBvsPSMJB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MARUDvsPSMJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFCBvsPSMRB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MARUDvsPSMRB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.