Skip to content
etf.net

MARU vs PSMJ

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF

MARUDCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

PSMJBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSMJ −0.25pt a year

MARU0.74%PSMJ0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

PSMJ 5.6×the volume

MARU1.19KPSMJ6.64K

MARU vs PSMJ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+6.3%MARU+8.2%PSMJ

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. MARU +6.3%. PSMJ +8.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%−2.5%0%2.5%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
MARU 0.74%
PSMJ 0.49%, better
Fund size
MARU $35M
PSMJ $108M
1Y total return
MARU +6.3%
PSMJ +8.2%, better
Yield (12M)
MARU No data
PSMJ 0.00%
Holdings
MARU 2
PSMJ 3
Avg volume (30D)
MARU 1.19K sh
PSMJ 6.64K sh, better
NAV per share
MARU $30.13
PSMJ $34.43
52W range

ETF.net Grade

MARU: Cost 51, Risk 11, Mission not scored, Tradability 27, Holdings 56, Durability 30. PSMJ: Cost 70, Risk 46, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings not scored, Durability 63.
Pillar letters and Scores for MARU, PSMJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarMARUPSMJ
Cost30% weightC51A70Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightF11C46Higher
Tradability15% weightD27C50Higher
Holdings10% weightB56Not scored
Durability5% weightD30B63Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. MARU and PSMJ are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PSMJ ranks 2nd and MARU 48th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 3BPSMRPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 46DSPBUAllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETFScore 38
  5. Rank 48DMARUAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETFScore 37
  6. Rank 49DNVBUAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Nov ETFScore 36

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

MARUDAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF

PSMJBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

In short

MARU No data

PSMJ Pacer's July-dated stop on the Swan SOS ladder: FLEX options on SPY that buffer the first 15% of a fall over a roughly one-year period, with upside capped in return. At 0.49%, it undercuts most of the buffer aisle.

Stated mandate

MARU No data

PSMJ The Fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over an approximately one-year period.

Why people hold it

MARU No data

  • PSMJ Charges 0.49% a year against a 0.79% median for its buffered-SPY cohort, the same 0.79% Innovator's Power Buffer funds (PJUL, PJAN, POCT) charge for a similar job.
  • The deal is legible: FLEX options on SPY absorb the first 15% of a decline over the outcome period, and match the ETF's gains up to a cap struck each July.paceretfs.compaceretfs.com 2
  • Those FLEX options are customizable exchange-traded contracts settled through the Options Clearing Corporation, and Durango-based Swan Global Management sub-advises the strategy.paceretfs.com
  • One of four Moderate-series funds with staggered start months (PSMD, PSMR, PSMJ, PSMO), so a July reset can be stacked against other entry points rather than standing alone.paceretfs.com

Worth knowing

MARU No data

  • PSMJ The 15% buffer and the cap belong to the full outcome period. Step in mid-period and you inherit whatever cap and buffer remain, not the starting terms.paceretfs.com
  • Thinly traded next to the largest buffer funds, so spreads and limit orders deserve more of your attention at the point of entry.
  • No regular income stream here: the options structure delivers its result through share price rather than distributions.paceretfs.com

Full MARU profile⁠

Full PSMJ profile⁠

MARU vs PSMJ Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

MARU vs PSMJ Cost

Overpaying MARU vs PSMJ

$4,515

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • MARU 0.74%

    $14,307

  • PSMJ 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • MARU 0.74%
  • PSMJ 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530MARU $14,307PSMJ $9,792

Year by year

YearMARUPSMJOverpaying
10$1,319$883$436
20$5,015$3,394$1,621
30$14,307$9,792$4,515

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%MARU
  • 0.49%PSMJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PSMJ 5th cheapest of 51 funds

MARU 18th cheapest of 51 funds

MARU vs PSMJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
MARU No data
PSMJ 0.00%
Payout (12M)
MARU None
PSMJ None

Distribution history

Per share, 2021, same scale for both

MARUAll MARU payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSMJ1 paymentAll PSMJ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2021. Dec 23, 2021 $0.0038. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.00252021

MARU vs PSMJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
MARU 8.5%since Apr 2025PSMJ 6.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
MARU 1.14since Apr 2025PSMJ 1.47
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
MARU −8.5%since Mar 2025PSMJ −10.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
MARU 0.71PSMJ 0.47

Popular comparisons

  • MARUDvsPSMOB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PSMJBvsPSMOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MARUDvsPSMRB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PSMJBvsPSMRB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MARUDvsBUFCB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PSMJBvsBUFCB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.