BUFC ranks 4th and PJUL 13th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
BUFC vs PJUL
0.0%by weight
BUFC −0.10pt a year
0.69%0.79%
PJUL 2.2×the volume
49.5K109K
BUFC vs PJUL Performance
+5.7%+7.7%
- BUFC 0.69%, better
- PJUL 0.79%
- BUFC $1.1B
- PJUL $1.29B
- BUFC +5.7%
- PJUL +7.7%, better
- BUFC
- PJUL 0.00%
- BUFC 5
- PJUL 3
- BUFC 49.5K sh
- PJUL 109K sh, better
- BUFC $43.25
- PJUL $49.56
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BUFC | PJUL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B57Higher | D35 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C41 | C47Higher |
| Tradability | B62 | B67Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A74 | A88Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. BUFC and PJUL are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BUFCB
PJULC
In short
BUFC Most buffer funds lock you into a 12-month outcome period. BUFC resets every three months, targeting 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 with roughly 3% of the upside per period. Deep cushion, short leash.
PJUL Rides the S&P 500, absorbs the first 15% of a 12-month drawdown, and gives up upside above a cap in exchange. Innovator's July-reset Power Buffer, running the same playbook since 2018.
Stated mandate
BUFC The Fund is an actively managed equity ETF seeking conservative capital appreciation with potential partial downside protection. It uses options to establish an upside cap and downside protection over rolling three-month periods, targeting 15% downside protection and about 3% upside participation to the S&P 500.
PJUL The Fund seeks to track the return of SPY up to a predetermined cap while protecting investors from the first 15% of losses over the current outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BUFC vs PJUL Holdings
How BUFC and PJUL differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BUFC and 0.0% of PJUL.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
| Sector | More in BUFCMore in PJUL | BUFC | PJUL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | Same weight | 40.1% | 40.1% |
| Financials | Same weight | 11.3% | 11.3% |
| Communication | Same weight | 9.9% | 9.9% |
| Health Care | Same weight | 9.4% | 9.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | Same weight | 8.7% | 8.7% |
| Industrials | Same weight | 7.6% | 7.6% |
| Consumer Staples | Same weight | 4.4% | 4.4% |
| Energy | Same weight | 3.4% | 3.4% |
| Utilities | Same weight | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Real Estate | Same weight | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Materials | Same weight | 1.6% | 1.6% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in BUFCMore in PJUL | BUFC | PJUL |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- BUFC100.3%
- PJUL102.9%
- BUFC3
- PJUL3
Asset class
- BUFC
- Alternatives
- PJUL
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in BUFC3
- In both0
- Only in PJUL3
Only in BUFC
3 securities, 100% of BUFC by weight
- 4SPY 11/30/26 C3.86 4SPY 11/30/26 C3.8697.28%
- 4SPY 11/30/26 P772.49 4SPY 11/30/26 P772.492.51%
- Alliancebernstein Govt Stif Ssc Fund 64BA Agis 5870.53%
Only in PJUL
3 securities, 100% of PJUL by weight
- Spy 06/30/2027 7.47 C98.40%
- Spy 06/30/2027 746.77 P4.24%
- Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.30%
Weight gaps
BUFC and PJUL share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BUFC vs PJUL Cost
Overpaying PJUL vs BUFC
$1,745
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BUFC 0.69%
$13,429
PJUL 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BUFC | PJUL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $1,405 | $173 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $5,331 | $634 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $15,174 | $1,745 |
- 0.69%BUFC, cheaper
- 0.79%PJUL
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
BUFC 17th cheapest of 51 funds
PJUL 24th cheapest of 51 funds
BUFC vs PJUL Dividends
- BUFC
- PJUL 0.00%
- BUFC None
- PJUL None
Distribution history
BUFC vs PJUL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BUFC 3.4%PJUL 6.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- BUFC 0.82PJUL 1.44
- Worst fall
- BUFC −8.3%PJUL −10.7%
- Market sensitivity
- BUFC 0.26PJUL 0.47
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.