Skip to content

BUFC vs PJUL

AB Conservative Buffer ETF

BUFCBNasdaq

Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF

PJULCCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

BUFC −0.10pt a year

BUFC0.69%PJUL0.79%

Avg volume · 30D

PJUL 2.2×the volume

BUFC49.5KPJUL109K

BUFC vs PJUL Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+5.7%BUFC+7.7%PJUL

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. BUFC +5.7%. PJUL +7.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2%4%10%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
BUFC 0.69%, better
PJUL 0.79%
Fund size
BUFC $1.1B
PJUL $1.29B
1Y total return
BUFC +5.7%
PJUL +7.7%, better
Yield (12M)
BUFC No data
PJUL 0.00%
Holdings
BUFC 5
PJUL 3
Avg volume (30D)
BUFC 49.5K sh
PJUL 109K sh, better
NAV per share
BUFC $43.25
PJUL $49.56
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BUFC: Cost 57, Risk 41, Mission not scored, Tradability 62, Holdings not scored, Durability 74. PJUL: Cost 35, Risk 47, Mission not scored, Tradability 67, Holdings not scored, Durability 88.
Pillar letters and Scores for BUFC, PJUL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBUFCPJUL
Cost30% weightB57HigherD35
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC41C47Higher
Tradability15% weightB62B67Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA74A88Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BUFC and PJUL are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

BUFC ranks 4th and PJUL 13th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 3BPSMRPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 4BBUFCAB Conservative Buffer ETFScore 55
  5. Rank 4BPOCTInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 55
  6. Rank 11CTENMiShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETFScore 50
  7. Rank 13CPJULInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 49
  8. Rank 14CPFEBInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 48

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BUFCBAB Conservative Buffer ETF

PJULCInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF

In short

BUFC Most buffer funds lock you into a 12-month outcome period. BUFC resets every three months, targeting 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 with roughly 3% of the upside per period. Deep cushion, short leash.

PJUL Rides the S&P 500, absorbs the first 15% of a 12-month drawdown, and gives up upside above a cap in exchange. Innovator's July-reset Power Buffer, running the same playbook since 2018.

Stated mandate

BUFC The Fund is an actively managed equity ETF seeking conservative capital appreciation with potential partial downside protection. It uses options to establish an upside cap and downside protection over rolling three-month periods, targeting 15% downside protection and about 3% upside participation to the S&P 500.

PJUL The Fund seeks to track the return of SPY up to a predetermined cap while protecting investors from the first 15% of losses over the current outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • BUFC Uses options to target 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 over rolling three-month periods, so the cushion resets four times a year instead of once.alliancebernstein.com
  • At 0.69%, it costs less than Innovator's 0.79% Power Buffer funds (PJUL, PJAN, POCT) and less than the typical fund in its buffer cohort.
  • Actively managed rather than pinned to a calendar index series, running since 2023, and among the stronger implementations in its buffer peer group.
  • PJUL The buffer is the whole product: built to absorb the first 15% of reference-index losses across each one-year outcome period, with upside capped in return.innovatoretfs.com
  • Trades tightly for a defined-outcome fund, and at multi-billion-dollar size it is one of the more established names on the buffer shelf.
  • A 2018 vintage that has carried its buffer through real market cycles, and among buffer funds we grade it sits near the top of the group.

Worth knowing

  • BUFC The price of that deep cushion: upside participation is targeted near 3% per three-month period, so big rallies mostly pass you by.
  • Protection is partial and period-based. Losses past the targeted 15% pass through, and buying mid-period shifts your effective buffer and cap.alliancebernstein.com
  • Thinly traded for its size, so spreads and limit orders deserve attention.
  • PJUL Cap and buffer are set at the July 1 reset and apply to full-period holders. Step in midstream and your effective cap and remaining buffer differ from the headline terms.innovatoretfs.com
  • 0.79% is the category median, not the floor. The laddered sibling BUFF lists 0.10% and spreads the same Power Buffer approach across staggered start dates.
  • Income is not part of the design. The options-based structure has not been throwing off distributions.

Full BUFC profile⁠

Full PJUL profile⁠

BUFC vs PJUL Holdings

How BUFC and PJUL differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BUFC and 0.0% of PJUL.

Level by level

  • Asset classAlternatives, Equity0.0%
  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile100%
  • Sector11 Sectors100%

Sector

Sector weights in BUFC and PJUL, widest gap first
SectorMore in BUFCMore in PJUL
TechnologySame weight
FinancialsSame weight
CommunicationSame weight
Health CareSame weight
Consumer DiscretionarySame weight
IndustrialsSame weight
Consumer StaplesSame weight
EnergySame weight
UtilitiesSame weight
Real EstateSame weight
MaterialsSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BUFC and PJUL, widest gap first
CountryMore in BUFCMore in PJUL
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • BUFC100.3%
  • PJUL102.9%

Securities held

  • BUFC3
  • PJUL3

Asset class

BUFC
Alternatives
PJUL
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in BUFC3
  • In both0
  • Only in PJUL3

Only in BUFC

3 securities, 100% of BUFC by weight

  • 4SPY 11/30/26 C3.86 4SPY 11/30/26 C3.8697.28%
  • 4SPY 11/30/26 P772.49 4SPY 11/30/26 P772.492.51%
  • Alliancebernstein Govt Stif Ssc Fund 64BA Agis 5870.53%

Only in PJUL

3 securities, 100% of PJUL by weight

  • Spy 06/30/2027 7.47 C98.40%
  • Spy 06/30/2027 746.77 P4.24%
  • Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.30%

Weight gaps

BUFC and PJUL share no securities.

All 7 BUFC holdings⁠All 6 PJUL holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BUFC vs PJUL Cost

Overpaying PJUL vs BUFC

$1,745

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BUFC 0.69%

    $13,429

  • PJUL 0.79%

    $15,174

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BUFC 0.69%
  • PJUL 0.79%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530PJUL $15,174BUFC $13,429

Year by year

YearBUFCPJULOverpaying
10$1,232$1,405$173
20$4,697$5,331$634
30$13,429$15,174$1,745

Expense ratio

  • 0.69%BUFC, cheaper
  • 0.79%PJUL
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

BUFC 17th cheapest of 51 funds

PJUL 24th cheapest of 51 funds

BUFC vs PJUL Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
BUFC No data
PJUL 0.00%
Payout (12M)
BUFC None
PJUL None

Distribution history

Per share, 2019, same scale for both

BUFCAll BUFC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PJUL1 paymentAll PJUL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2019. Nov 19, 2019 $0.22. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252019

BUFC vs PJUL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BUFC 3.4%since Jan 2024PJUL 6.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BUFC 0.82since Jan 2024PJUL 1.44
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BUFC −8.3%since Dec 2023PJUL −10.7%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BUFC 0.26PJUL 0.47

Popular comparisons

  • BUFCBvsPSMOB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PJULCvsPSMOB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFCBvsPSMJB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PJULCvsPSMJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFCBvsPSMRB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PJULCvsPSMRB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.